Are EU qualified timestamps recognised in UK courts after Brexit?

Yes. Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 was retained in UK domestic law on exit, and the assimilated Regulation treats anything qualified under the equivalent EU law as qualified for the purposes of the presumption. So a timestamp from a QTSP on the EU Trusted List attracts the presumption of accurate date, time and data integrity before a UK court, without that provider appearing on the UK Trusted List. The only carve-out covers services qualified in the EU solely through a third-country recognition agreement, which does not apply to a provider established and supervised in the EU, such as Disig a.s.

What exactly does the presumption cover?

As it has effect in UK law, the Regulation provides that a qualified electronic time stamp “shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound”. It covers the date, the time and the integrity of the bound data. Whether the page said what you say it said, and how much weight the capture carries, are matters for ordinary evidence law: in England and Wales the Civil Evidence Act 1995 and the Civil Procedure Rules, with a witness statement exhibiting the capture.

What does the evidence package contain?

Depending on the plan, 11 to 15 files in a single ZIP: a full-page JPEG screenshot, evidence PDF, full HTML source, DOM text content, metadata (URL, capture time, TLS information, cookies and localStorage), forensic log, chain of custody, signed manifest with SHA-256 hashes, RSA-4096 digital signature and public key, an OpenTimestamps blockchain timestamp on every plan except Essential, a capture video when you record one, and the EU qualified electronic timestamp on Enterprise and Company plans or with an eIDAS SnapPack. That is 11 files on Essential, 12 on Professional and 15 on Enterprise and Company. Every file is cryptographically linked to the signed manifest.

Will UK courts admit a plain screenshot?

A plain screenshot may be admitted, but it is easy to attack. Opposing parties often say that a screenshot was edited or generated with AI, and an image alone carries nothing to answer that. The ACPO Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence (Version 5, October 2011) asks for an audit trail that an independent third party can examine and repeat. ProofSnap captures the source HTML, DOM text, metadata and, if you record one, a video of the capture, then hashes the package with SHA-256 and, on the eIDAS plans, timestamps it with an EU qualified timestamp.

Does ProofSnap align with the ACPO Good Practice Guide?

ProofSnap is built around the four principles of the ACPO Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence, Version 5 (October 2011), published March 2012. The Guide is non-statutory best-practice guidance, so there is no certification to hold: ProofSnap claims alignment with the principles, not compliance with a standard. Below are the principles, verbatim, and how the product answers each. “No action taken by law enforcement agencies, persons employed within those agencies or their agents should change data which may subsequently be relied upon in court.” Capture does not change the source page; any temporary layout change made in the browser during capture, such as a hidden cookie banner, is restored and disclosed in the chain of custody. “In circumstances where a person finds it necessary to access original data, that person must be competent to do so and be able to give evidence explaining the relevance and the implications of their actions.” A forensic log records tool, version, operator, time and device details, giving the operator the material to explain what was done. “An audit trail or other record of all processes applied to digital evidence should be created and preserved. An independent third party should be able to examine those processes and achieve the same result.” Every file is SHA-256 hashed and listed in a signed manifest, and an independent third party can re-run the verification offline or via the Trust Verifier and reach the same result. “The person in charge of the investigation has overall responsibility for ensuring that the law and these principles are adhered to.” A chain-of-custody record names the operator and the time of every action.

Is a ProofSnap package compatible with disclosure under the Civil Procedure Rules?

Yes. In England and Wales electronic documents fall within disclosure, under the general disclosure rules and under the separate regime of the Business and Property Courts. Each ProofSnap capture produces a self-contained ZIP that can be disclosed with its SHA-256 hash. Where authenticity is challenged, the receiving party can verify the package via the Trust Verifier without contacting ProofSnap.

Can I capture WhatsApp evidence for a UK family-law matter?

Yes. Open the conversation in WhatsApp Web (web.whatsapp.com) in Chrome and run a ProofSnap capture. ProofSnap recognises WhatsApp Web and scrolls through the full thread rather than capturing a single screen. The output is a hashed evidence package showing the complete conversation in context, which answers the common concern about cherry-picked screenshots. If authenticity is later challenged, the signed manifest and, on the eIDAS plans, the qualified timestamp let anyone verify the package independently.

Do I still need a witness statement?

Yes. ProofSnap is the technical capture tool. A witness statement (or the criminal equivalent) is still needed to exhibit the package and explain who performed the capture, when and why. The presumption covers the date, the time and the integrity of the data bound to them; who made the capture is for the witness to say. The forensic log inside the package gives the operator a contemporaneous record for drafting the statement: tool, version, operator, machine and capture time. Quote the SHA-256 manifest hash in the statement so the exhibit can be re-verified later.

Which Qualified Trust Service Provider issues the timestamp?

Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List. Its qualified timestamps carry the presumption of the accuracy of the date and time and the integrity of the bound data, and the assimilated Regulation extends that presumption to them before a UK court.

Is a qualified timestamp the same as a qualified electronic signature?

No. A qualified electronic signature identifies the person who signs, and the eIDAS Regulation gives it the legal effect of a handwritten signature. A qualified electronic timestamp says nothing about who you are: it binds the data to a date and time, with a presumption that both are accurate and that the data has not changed since. Both are qualified trust services, retained in UK law after Brexit and recognised in the UK when qualified in the EU. A ProofSnap capture uses the timestamp rather than a signature, because the question a court asks of a web capture is when it was made and whether it has changed since.

Is the evidence verifiable without trusting ProofSnap?

Yes. The Trust Verifier at getproofsnap.com/verify/index.html runs in the browser and the ZIP is never uploaded. It recomputes the SHA-256 hashes, validates the RSA-4096 signature against the embedded public key, checks the OpenTimestamps anchor on the Bitcoin blockchain and verifies the qualified timestamp’s RFC 3161 token. The receiving party, opposing counsel or a judge can use it with no ProofSnap account, and the verification scripts in the package check the hashes and the signature offline.

Does it work for criminal investigations under PACE 1984?

PACE 1984 governs police powers and the handling of evidence in criminal proceedings. In criminal proceedings the courts work from a common-law presumption that a computer was operating correctly; the Ministry of Justice call for evidence on it closed in April 2025, and as at October 2026 no outcome has been published. Evidence captured to ACPO principles (a contemporaneous forensic log, a hashed manifest and a chain of custody) gives the court more to rely on. A witness statement from the investigator is always required.

Will family courts in England and Wales accept WhatsApp evidence captured by ProofSnap?

Under the Family Procedure Rules, WhatsApp messages, texts and social-media posts can be exhibited to a witness statement like any other documentary evidence, and the Civil Evidence Act 1995 supplies the principles for assessing weight. ProofSnap captures the full WhatsApp Web thread (web.whatsapp.com) in context, which answers the cherry-picked screenshot objection, and seals it with SHA-256 hashing, an RSA-4096 signature and, on the eIDAS plans, an EU qualified timestamp. The package is exhibited with the SHA-256 hash quoted, so the other party or the judge can re-verify it with the public Trust Verifier.

Will employment tribunals in Great Britain accept ProofSnap captures of Teams, Slack and LinkedIn?

Yes, and the reason matters. The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 provide: “The Tribunal is not bound by any rule of law relating to the admissibility of evidence in proceedings before the courts.” Because admissibility is not the obstacle, the real contest in a tribunal is weight. ProofSnap is designed to be used before the lockout, because once HR revokes access on dismissal the material is out of the claimant’s reach. The hashed, timestamped package goes into the tribunal bundle, exhibited to a witness statement with the SHA-256 hash quoted, so the respondent can check it without instructing a forensic expert.

Is WhatsApp evidence hearsay in UK civil proceedings?

In England and Wales, WhatsApp messages tendered to prove the truth of their contents are hearsay. The Civil Evidence Act 1995 provides that hearsay is not excluded in civil proceedings merely because it is hearsay, so the question is one of weight rather than admissibility. The party relying on it gives hearsay notice under the Civil Procedure Rules, including in the Business and Property Courts, whose separate disclosure regime has no hearsay provisions. Failing to give notice can count against you in costs and in weight. The court then weighs the evidence by reference to the circumstances bearing on its reliability, and the ProofSnap package, with its hash, RSA-4096 signature, forensic log and, on the eIDAS plans, qualified timestamp, speaks directly to that.

How much does it cost?

The eIDAS SnapPack is the pay-per-use option for one-off filings, takedowns and hearings: 1 stamp $4.99 (approx. £4.00), 5 stamps $14.99 (approx. £12, Best Value), 10 stamps $24.99 (approx. £20). eIDAS credits are valid for 12 months, with no subscription and no auto-renewal. The Basic SnapPack, $4.99 (approx. £4) for 10 captures with no expiry, covers blockchain timestamping when you do not need the eIDAS presumption. Subscriptions start with Essential at $8.99 a month (approx. £7, 100 captures) and Professional at $16.99 a month (approx. £13.50, 200 captures). Enterprise at $28.99 a month (approx. £23) and Company at $18.99 per seat a month (approx. £15) both include unlimited captures; Enterprise adds 10 eIDAS qualified timestamps a month and Company 5 per seat. A 7-day trial requires a credit card, and an Enterprise or Company trial includes 1 eIDAS stamp. All prices are charged in US dollars; the sterling figures are approximations, not the amount billed.

For UK solicitors and investigators: web evidence with a qualified timestamp

In a UK court a screenshot is easy to challenge. Hash. Timestamp. Chain of custody.

In 2026 an eIDAS qualified timestamp carries a legal presumption in UK law: the date and time it states are presumed accurate and the bound data unaltered. The rule was retained after Brexit and reaches timestamps qualified in the EU. ProofSnap applies one to a web capture in your browser, self-service, from $4.99.

Seal the page in your browser right now, hashed and timestamped, before it changes, disappears or gets challenged as AI-generated. Backed by an EU eIDAS qualified timestamp that carries the presumption of accurate date and time before a UK court.

Built around the ACPO Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence and ISO/IEC 27037, for use with the Civil Procedure Rules and the Civil Evidence Act 1995. Independently verifiable by the other side, without a ProofSnap account.

Capture now: eIDAS SnapPack from $4.99 See how it works

Also available for Microsoft Edge

eIDAS SnapPack: $4.99 / 1 stamp · $14.99 / 5 stamps · Enterprise and Company trials include 1 stamp · No subscription required

UK eIDAS Regulations · ACPO Good Practice Guide · Civil Procedure Rules · Civil Evidence Act 1995 · ISO/IEC 27037

ProofSnap Chrome extension side panel for UK evidence capture: page snapshot, video recording, EU eIDAS qualified timestamp and Trust Verifier

By Radim Motycka, Founder & Lead Engineer, ProofSnap, 10+ years in cryptographic systems and digital signatures · reviewed against UK legislation on legislation.gov.uk · getproofsnap.com

First published: 1 May 2026 · Last updated: 14 October 2026

A qualified electronic timestamp carries a legal presumption in the United Kingdom in 2026: the date and time it states are presumed accurate and the bound data unaltered, and the presumption reaches timestamps qualified in the EU, such as ProofSnap’s. It goes to time and integrity; the content of the exhibit is for the witness and the court.

1 click

to seal the page in your browser

11 to 15

files in every evidence package

UK eIDAS

qualified timestamps recognised

ACPO

aligned with the Good Practice Guide

Qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List

Does an EU qualified timestamp count in a UK court? The chain, step by step

The United Kingdom is not a member of the European Union, so nothing here rests on EU law applying in the UK. It rests on UK domestic law, in three steps, each traceable on legislation.gov.uk.

1. The trust services part of eIDAS is still UK law.

Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, with its trust services chapter, was retained in UK domestic law on exit by the Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019. It is now assimilated law, and the Information Commissioner is the UK supervisory body.
2. Article 41(2) gives the presumption.

As it has effect in UK law, it reads, verbatim: “A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.” The presumption is rebuttable, and it covers the date, the time and the integrity of the data.
3. Article 24A carries an EU-qualified timestamp across the border.

Inserted by the same exit regulations, it provides that, for the purposes of the presumption, among others, anything not qualified under the UK Regulation is treated as qualified if “it is qualified under the equivalent EU law”. So a timestamp from a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List attracts the presumption before a UK court, even though that provider is not on the UK Trusted List.

One carve-out is worth knowing, because a careful opponent will look for it. The same Article excludes a service that is qualified in the EU “only by virtue of provision for the recognition of trust services provided by entities established outside the EU pursuant to an international agreement to which the EU is party”. Disig a.s. is a provider established in the EU and on the EU Trusted List in its own right, so the carve-out does not apply.

What the presumption covers

The presumption is narrow, and opposing counsel will be precise about its edges. It covers two things: that the date and time are accurate, and that the data bound to them has not changed since. Whether the page said what you say it said is a matter for ordinary evidence law.

In England and Wales, section 4(1) of the Civil Evidence Act 1995 requires the court, in estimating the weight of hearsay evidence, to “have regard to any circumstances from which any inference can reasonably be drawn as to the reliability or otherwise of the evidence”. A qualified timestamp, a SHA-256 hash and a chain-of-custody log are such circumstances. A witness statement still puts the package before the court.

The presumption can be rebutted, but only with evidence that the date, the time or the data are wrong, for example that the hash does not match the file or that the timestamp token does not verify against the provider’s certificate. Anyone can run both checks. If the other side wants authenticity proved at trial, it has to serve a notice to prove the document; the hashes and the Trust Verifier are the answer to it.

Which UK jurisdiction are you actually in?

The eIDAS rules above apply across the United Kingdom; the evidence rules do not. The Civil Evidence Act 1995, the Civil Procedure Rules and the Family Procedure Rules apply in England and Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own civil evidence legislation and rules of court. The evidence package is identical wherever you file; the procedural route for putting it before the court is not.

Litigating in an EU member state instead? The position is simpler.

Before a court in an EU member state, the presumption applies directly as EU law. For a UK business enforcing against an EU counterparty, suing in an EU forum or filing with an EU regulator, an EU-qualified timestamp means the same evidence package carries the presumption in both places. That is why ProofSnap uses a QTSP on the EU Trusted List.

Capture before…

Six moments when web evidence vanishes or gets challenged. Leave it too late and the case can turn against you.

…the post is deleted.

The defamatory tweet, the one-star Google review, the Reddit thread: often gone once the letter before claim arrives.

…the takedown notice goes out.

The counterfeit listing or infringing copy is often pulled within hours of a takedown notice. No proof of what was there.

…the lockout begins.

Performance reviews, Slack/Teams threads, the advert for your client’s replacement. Once HR revokes access, the evidence is theirs.

…the subject sees the letter.

Holiday photos disappear from Facebook. Dating-app profiles vanish. The catfish account is deactivated overnight.

…the page is quietly edited.

Financial promotions, T&Cs and cookie banners get changed without notice. The regulator asks: “What did the page say at 09:42 on Tuesday?”

…the challenge starts.

At the hearing: “This screenshot was generated with AI.” Without a hash, a timestamp and a chain of custody, the screenshot loses weight.

UK digital evidence: the terms a solicitor needs to know in 2026

Plain-English definitions of the legal and technical concepts that govern whether a screenshot, WhatsApp thread or web page will be admitted as evidence in a UK court.

What are the UK eIDAS Regulations?

“UK eIDAS” is shorthand for Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law, with its trust services chapter retained by the 2019 exit regulations. It is now assimilated law, and the Information Commissioner is the supervisory body. The provision that matters for an EU-issued timestamp is the one that treats anything qualified under the equivalent EU law as qualified for the purposes of the presumption.

What is a qualified electronic timestamp?

A qualified electronic timestamp is a cryptographic seal that binds data to a specific point in time, issued by a Qualified Trust Service Provider. The eIDAS Regulation gives it a presumption of the accuracy of the date and time it indicates and of the integrity of the data bound to it. The presumption is rebuttable. In the United Kingdom it reaches timestamps qualified in the EU through the assimilated Regulation.

Are WhatsApp screenshots admissible in UK courts?

Yes, subject to authentication and weight. WhatsApp messages can be relied on in civil and family proceedings in England and Wales; in civil proceedings hearsay notice is given where they are used to prove what they say. A plain screenshot is easy to attack: opposing parties often allege it was edited or generated with AI. ProofSnap captures the full WhatsApp Web thread with SHA-256 hashing, an RSA-4096 signature and, on the eIDAS plans, an EU qualified timestamp, which answers the cherry-picked screenshot objection in one step.

What is the ACPO Good Practice Guide?

The ACPO Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence, Version 5 (October 2011), published March 2012, is non-statutory best-practice guidance, widely used in the UK for handling digital evidence. Principle 3 is the one a capture tool has to answer to: “An audit trail or other record of all processes applied to digital evidence should be created and preserved. An independent third party should be able to examine those processes and achieve the same result.” ProofSnap’s forensic log, signed manifest and offline verification scripts are designed to align with that principle.

Disclosure under the Civil Procedure Rules

In England and Wales, electronic documents fall within disclosure, both under the general disclosure rules and under the separate regime of the Business and Property Courts. Hearsay notice is a separate step and still applies in the Business and Property Courts. A ProofSnap evidence ZIP can be disclosed with its SHA-256 hash.

The Civil Evidence Act 1995 (England and Wales)

The Act governs hearsay and the proof of documents in civil proceedings in England and Wales. A statement in a document can be proved by a copy authenticated as the court approves, business records can be received without further proof, and the court weighs hearsay by reference to any circumstances bearing on its reliability. A qualified timestamp, a SHA-256 hash and a chain-of-custody log are such circumstances. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own civil evidence legislation.

Capture WhatsApp, social-media and website evidence: six UK practice areas

Family law, IP enforcement, employment tribunals, FCA compliance, private investigations and online defamation share one problem: proving what was on a website, in a chat or on a social media account before it changes, disappears or is challenged as AI-generated.

Family Law Solicitors

Before the WhatsApp thread is deleted.

Capture the full WhatsApp Web thread, not a cherry-picked screenshot, sealed with a SHA-256 hash and an EU qualified timestamp. Exhibit it to a witness statement with the hash quoted for independent verification.

WhatsApp threads Coercive control Financial disclosure Children Act

IP & Copyright Enforcement

Before the takedown notice goes out.

Seal the infringing page with an EU qualified timestamp before serving the takedown, because counterfeit listings can disappear within hours. Independently verifiable in IPEC, in the High Court or in answer to a counter-notice.

Counterfeit listings DMCA / takedowns Brand protection IPEC / High Court

Employment Tribunal Work

Before the lockout begins.

Teams chats, LinkedIn posts, the advert for your client’s replacement: capture them before HR revokes access. The hashed package supports a SAR, Acas early conciliation and the tribunal bundle.

Sham redundancy Discrimination SAR support Tribunal bundles

FCA, AML & Regulatory Compliance

Before the page is quietly edited.

Archive financial promotions, T&Cs, cookie banners and KYC pages with EU qualified timestamps. A dated, verifiable record when the FCA asks: “What did the page say at 09:42 on Tuesday?”

FCA promotions UK GDPR audits AML / KYC SM&CR records

Private Investigators & Insurers

Before the subject deactivates the account.

Holiday photos, catfish profiles, dating-app fraud: posts vanish the moment the subject receives a solicitor’s letter. An ACPO-aligned capture gives you a record you can put before a court or the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Insurance fraud OSINT investigations Dating-app fraud FOS evidence

Online Defamation & Harassment

Before the post is deleted.

The defamatory tweet, the one-star review, the Reddit thread: authors often delete them once the letter before claim arrives. Seal the publication on day one: it matters for limitation, serious harm and quantum. For intimate images, see how to report revenge porn in the UK and keep a record.

Defamation Act 2013 Harassment claims Letter before claim Limitation evidence

See eIDAS SnapPack pricing, from $4.99 (approx. £4.00)

How ProofSnap aligns with the UK legal framework

See the definitions section for full explanations of each standard.

Standard	How ProofSnap aligns
UK eIDAS Regulations	Disig a.s. is a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List. The assimilated Regulation treats an EU-qualified timestamp as qualified, so the presumption of date, time and data integrity applies in UK proceedings under UK law.
ACPO Good Practice Guide	Forensic log (operator and tool version), SHA-256 manifest and a chain-of-custody record naming the operator, reproducible via the public Trust Verifier.
Civil Procedure Rules (disclosure)	ZIP disclosed with its SHA-256 hash; the receiving party verifies it via the public Trust Verifier without contacting ProofSnap.
Civil Evidence Act 1995	Hashed manifest, qualified timestamp and chain-of-custody log give the court the technical material it needs when assessing weight.
PACE 1984 (criminal)	ACPO-aligned evidence gives a criminal court more to rely on. A witness statement is still required.
ISO/IEC 27037	ISO/IEC 27037-style identification, collection and preservation, with a chain-of-custody record.

How to capture web evidence for UK courts in four steps

No API, no IT department, no set-up. Self-service in Chrome, from opening your browser to a disclosure-ready evidence package. Prefer to hand the job over? The done-for-you evidence capture service starts at $44.99 (approx. £36) per URL with delivery in 48 hours.

Install

Add ProofSnap from the Chrome Web Store. Start your 7-day trial (credit card required).

Open the page

WhatsApp Web thread, social-media post, listing, contract page or FCA promotion: anything a judge could ask about.

Click capture

ProofSnap captures a full-page screenshot, the source HTML, DOM text, metadata and, if you record one, a video. Each file is hashed and signed.

Disclose

Download the ZIP. Quote the SHA-256 hash in your witness statement under CPR Part 32. The receiving party can verify it with the public Trust Verifier.

What is inside the evidence package

• Full-page screenshot (JPEG)

• Evidence PDF

• Full HTML source

• DOM text content

• Metadata: URL, timestamp, TLS, cookies, localStorage

• Forensic log (tool, version, operator, machine)

• Chain-of-custody record

• Signed manifest with SHA-256 hashes

• RSA-4096 digital signature + public key

• Bitcoin blockchain timestamp (OpenTimestamps, .ots, not on Essential)

• Capture video (when recorded)

• EU qualified timestamp (Enterprise/Company or eIDAS SnapPack, .tsr)

11 files (Essential), 12 files (Professional), 15 files (Enterprise/Company). Every file is cryptographically linked to the signed manifest.

eIDAS SnapPack, pay-per-use

EU qualified timestamps, from $4.99 (approx. £4.00)

For UK solicitors, DPOs, IP teams and investigators who need an eIDAS qualified timestamp for one-off filings, takedowns or hearings, without committing to a subscription.

Issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List · Credits valid 12 months

1 stamp

$4.99

approx. £4.00 · $4.99 / stamp

For a single hearing or a one-off filing.

Best Value

5 stamps

$14.99

approx. £12 · $3.00 / stamp · save 40%

For a case file with several exhibits.

10 stamps

$24.99

approx. £20 · $2.50 / stamp · save 50%

For a busy quarter or recurring brand-protection work.

Same evidence package every time: full-page screenshot, evidence PDF, source HTML, DOM text, metadata, forensic log, chain of custody, signed manifest and blockchain timestamp, plus a capture video when you record one, upgraded with an eIDAS qualified timestamp that carries the eIDAS presumption before a UK court.

No commitment, no auto-renewal. A ProofSnap capture with a qualified timestamp starts at $4.99 (approx. £4.00) and takes a single click.

Capture now, from $4.99 (approx. £4.00)

Enterprise and Company trials include 1 eIDAS stamp · Credit card required

Other options

Don’t need a qualified timestamp this time?

Basic SnapPack: $4.99 (approx. £4)

10 captures · one-time, no subscription

Same evidence package with a Bitcoin blockchain timestamp. Cryptographically solid, without the eIDAS presumption.

• SHA-256 hash + RSA-4096 signature
• OpenTimestamps blockchain anchor
• Trust Verifier compatible

No subscription, no auto-renewal.

Capturing every week?

Subscriptions from $8.99/mo (approx. £7)

100 to unlimited captures a month · eIDAS stamps on Enterprise and Company

Essential · 100 captures a month$8.99/mo
Professional · + capture video$16.99/mo
Enterprise · 10 eIDAS qualified timestamps / month$28.99/mo
Company · 5 eIDAS qualified timestamps / seat / month$18.99/seat/mo

Full subscription pricing →

Frequently asked questions: UK digital evidence and eIDAS

The page changes. The post is deleted. The screenshot is challenged as fake.

Before any of that happens, seal the evidence with an EU eIDAS qualified timestamp, which carries the eIDAS presumption before a UK court. From $4.99 per stamp (approx. £4.00), no subscription.

Capture now, from $4.99 (approx. £4.00) Email sales

eIDAS SnapPack: $4.99 / 1 stamp · $14.99 / 5 stamps (Best Value) · $24.99 / 10 stamps · Credits valid 12 months