Your Licensees Report Their Own Numbers. In 87% of Audited Licenses the Numbers Were Wrong.

Yes. Company plan seats are assigned by email address, with no shared-domain requirement. The licensee creates a free ProofSnap account using any email they like, and you add that email from your Company dashboard. That seat stays occupied for as long as they are on your roster.

No. The licensee uses a seat under your Company plan: you pay, they capture. You control the roster from your dashboard: add a seat when a licensee needs to report, then remove it afterward to free the license for the next one. Note that each ProofSnap account can belong to only one company at a time.

No. The licensee captures their own screen, so you never need a login to their analytics account. You receive only the resulting evidence package and confirm its integrity yourself with the free Trust Verifier, so you never need a login to their account and the figure cannot be altered after capture.

No. Every file is hashed the moment the capture is taken, the hashes go into a manifest signed on the spot, and that manifest is submitted for anchoring to the Bitcoin blockchain, where it is confirmed in a later block. Any later change to the screenshot, the page HTML or a reported figure breaks the manifest and fails verification. What lands in your inbox is the licensee's dashboard exactly as it rendered on their screen, on a date neither side can move afterwards.

One seat per licensee reporting in a given period. The Company plan starts at 2 licenses, and you add or remove seats as your roster changes. If licensees report in cycles, you can reuse a seat by removing one licensee and adding the next.

Yes, in the sense that matters. Each evidence package includes a SHA-256 hash of every file, a signed manifest, a blockchain timestamp, C2PA Content Credentials and a chain-of-custody log, all independently verifiable by anyone, without trusting ProofSnap or the licensee. It is substantially stronger than a plain screenshot pasted into an email, and it gives both sides a shared, tamper-evident record to settle on.

An audit clause is a right you can exercise, not a control that runs by itself. Exercising it costs money, takes months, reaches back into closed reporting periods and tells the licensee you no longer trust them, which is why most licensors use it once a relationship is already in trouble rather than as routine practice. A seat costs a fraction of an audit and works every reporting period without anyone being accused of anything. The two are not alternatives: keep the audit clause for the cases that need it, and use the seat so the routine numbers arrive in a form that does not need auditing. If you do end up auditing, a series of dated captures gives the auditor a baseline to tie the accounting data back to.

Royalty management platforms are accounting systems. They take the royalty statement the licensee uploads, apply the contract terms, calculate what is owed and keep the audit trail of that calculation. They are good at it, but none of them verifies the number the licensee typed in, because the underlying dashboard sits in the licensee's own account, which no platform can reach. That is the gap ProofSnap fills. The seat produces a tamper-evident capture of the screen the figure came from, which you then feed into whatever system you already run. Use both: the platform for the accounting, the capture for the evidence that the input was real.