September 2025: A California court threw out Mendones v. Cushman & Wakefield because the video evidence was AI-generated. Is your evidence tamper-proof?
Edition For Gibraltar Ireland United Kingdom United States
+13 regions
AustraliaEvidence Act section 146, tribunals and eSafety CanadaCanada Evidence Act ss. 31.1-31.3 CypruseIDAS Article 41 plus the CPR 2023 IndiaSection 63 BSA, the certificate wants a hash MaltaeIDAS Article 41, applied directly New ZealandEvidence Act 2006 s 137 NigeriaEvidence Act 2011, section 84 SingaporeEvidence Act section 116A presumption United Arab EmiratesFederal Decree-Law 35/2022, DIFC and ADGM South AfricaECTA section 15, weighed on reliability The BahamasEvidence Act s.61 and a s.61(4) certificate Cayman IslandsEvidence Act s.48 and the Grand Court BermudaEvidence Act s.27E, the rule England repealed

Screenshots get thrown out of Gibraltar courts.
ProofSnap doesn't.

The only web evidence tool whose proofs survive even if our company disappears. Self-verifiable cryptography, no vendor lock-in, no “trust us” required.

Tamper-proof cryptographic evidence that courts accept: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, video of the capture, Provenance Certificate. One click. 41 seconds.

From $8.99/month (approx. £6.70) · Up to 15 files per package · 23 countries

Start your 7-day free trial Watch Demo (41s)

Also available for Microsoft Edge · Browser extension with eIDAS qualified timestamps that carry the Article 41(2) presumption in all 27 EU member states

ProofSnap Chrome extension side panel, capture page snapshot, record video, EU qualified timestamp (eIDAS), and Trust Verifier

Start without installing anything

No account, nothing to set up.

No signup

See exactly what a Gibraltar court receives

Download a real evidence package. Open the PDF, read the chain of custody, then drop the whole ZIP into the Trust Verifier and watch it check the hashes, the signature and the timestamps in front of you.

Download the sample package

9.4 MB ZIP. No account, no email address, nothing to install.

Check a package yourself Trust Verifier, runs in your browser Read the law firm opinion Free PDF, independent, no registration Send us a URL and we capture it free One public page per person. Tell us what it is for.

Or we do it for you

You send a link or the files. We send back a signed, timestamped package a Gibraltar court can check, within 24 hours.

We capture a web page Any public URL, from $44.99 (approx. £33.50) WhatsApp chat export Line-numbered court transcript, $59.99 (approx. £44.70) Telegram chat export Line-numbered court transcript, $59.99 (approx. £44.70) Signal chat export Line-numbered court transcript, $59.99 (approx. £44.70) Email thread Headers and attachments certified, $59.99 (approx. £44.70) Documents, photos, video, audio Files you already have, $59.99 (approx. £44.70)

A chat export is the file the app gives you when you tap Export chat. We render it as a readable transcript, hash every file and timestamp the result, so the other side cannot argue the messages were edited.

ProofSnap captures any web page as court-ready digital evidence in Gibraltar in 41 seconds. Gibraltar kept Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as domestic law after leaving the EU, so in 2026 Article 41(2) still applies: a qualified electronic time stamp is presumed accurate as to its date and time and as to the integrity of the data bound to it.

Gibraltar is the rare common law jurisdiction where a timestamp carries a statutory presumption. Gibraltar left the EU with the United Kingdom, but it kept Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 in force as Gibraltar domestic law, in the version in force from 1 January 2021, saved and adapted by the Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 under the Electronic Commerce Act 2001. Article 41(2) survives intact: a qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound. Article 24A is the bridge for a foreign timestamp. It lists Article 41(2) among the provisions where something qualified under equivalent EU law counts as qualified in Gibraltar. So a qualified timestamp from an EU qualified trust service provider on the EU Trusted List carries the presumption before a Gibraltar court. It does so as a matter of Gibraltar law, not because EU law applies here. The Gibraltar Regulatory Authority is the supervisory body for trust services. The presumption goes to the time and the integrity of the data, not to the truth of what the page said, so the court still weighs the evidence. What it removes is the argument about when the capture was made and whether it changed afterwards.

ProofSnap is a Chrome & Edge extension that captures web pages as court-admissible evidence in 41 seconds. Three capture options: single page, multi-tab browsing session (with per-tab forensic packages), or signed video proof (Auto, Manual, or Session-wide screen recording). Every capture includes a SHA-256 cryptographic hash, RSA-4096 digital signature, Bitcoin blockchain timestamp via OpenTimestamps, and a Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks for deepfake detection. Our eIDAS qualified timestamps, available on Enterprise plans, are issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List.

Procedure here follows the English model. The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 apply in Gibraltar with local modifications under the Supreme Court Rules 2000, so CPR 32.19 governs the first fight you will have about a screenshot: the authenticity of a disclosed document is deemed admitted unless the other side serves a notice to prove it at trial. Serve that notice on a bare screenshot and the party relying on it has to call someone to prove it. Serve it on a signed, hashed, qualified-timestamped package and the proof is already in the file. Within the Supreme Court most smaller disputes run on the small claims track up to £10,000 or the fast track up to £15,000. Beyond it sit the Employment Tribunal, on a three-month clock, and the Gambling Commissioner, who will consider a player complaint once the operator has had two weeks to resolve it and has not. The same signed package supports a gambling operator complaint, a chat thread you need to exhibit to a witness statement or a law firm's evidence file. Pricing starts at $8.99/month (approx. £6.70) with a 7-day free trial that requires a credit card. Used by barristers, solicitors, STR hosts, copyright enforcement firms and compliance teams in 23 countries.

· · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier

41s
Per capture
11-15
Files per evidence package
27
EU states, legal recognition
7 days
7-day trial, credit card required

Trusted by professionals at

State Attorney General's Office · Süddeutsche Zeitung · Coty Inc · Hogan Lovells

Powered by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Why courts reject screenshots

United States courts rejected screenshot evidence in United States v. Vayner, Griffin v. State and Serrano v. Cruz-Angeles. The same authentication gap arises in Gibraltar.

No timestamp proof

File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.

No tampering detection

Any screenshot can be edited in 10 seconds with AI. On 9 September 2025 the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, dismissed Mendones v. Cushman & Wakefield with prejudice as a terminating sanction, after finding that video exhibits had been generated with AI. Without a SHA-256 hash, there is no way to prove yours is real.

No chain of custody

Who captured it? When? On what device? How was it stored? Screenshots don't answer any of these questions. Under CPR 32.19 the other side can serve a notice to prove, and then a bare screenshot has to be authenticated by a witness.

Fix this in 41 seconds. Start Free Trial

Your screenshot

  • 1 JPEG file, no proof it's real
  • No timestamp, could have been taken at any time
  • Editable in Photoshop in 10 seconds
  • Judge: “Anyone could have made this.”

ProofSnap evidence package

  • Up to 15 files, screenshot, HTML, metadata, forensic log
  • Blockchain timestamp, immutable proof of when it was captured
  • Video of capture + Provenance Certificate
  • Chain of custody, court-ready in Gibraltar and across the EU

Built for how disputes start in Gibraltar

Capture it before they delete it

Gibraltar is small, its procedure follows England, and its economy runs largely online. Industry estimates published in 2025 and 2026 put gaming alone at a fifth to a third of GDP, with more than 3,200 people employed in it, so a large share of local disputes starts on a platform, a terms page or a chat rather than on paper. Every forum here works from documents filed in advance, and every one of them will let the other side put you to proof of what you captured. ProofSnap seals it in seconds, with a signed PDF, a SHA-256 hash and an eIDAS qualified timestamp that holds up when the other side says "that screenshot is fake".

Employment Tribunal: three months less a day

A claim for unfair dismissal has to reach the Gibraltar Employment Tribunal within three months of the effective date of termination, in practice three months less a day, and the employee normally needs a year of continuous employment to bring one at all. A late claim is fatal unless it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time, and not knowing the law does not count. What decides these cases is the written record: the rota, the internal announcement, the manager's message, the HR portal entry. Access to company systems is usually cut off on the day you leave, so capture what you need before the account is deactivated.

Defamation: six years, and damages track the reach

Gibraltar has not adopted the English Defamation Act 2013. The Defamation Act 1960 still governs, the limitation period is six years under section 8 of the Limitation Act 1960, there is no statutory serious harm threshold, and a party can still elect trial by jury, as the Supreme Court confirmed in Allen and Wood v Panorama Ltd [2021] GSC 11. Because damages turn on how far the words travelled, the extent of publication is itself a fact you have to prove: in Picardo v Rosety Fernandez de Castro [2022] GSC 20 the court estimated the Gibraltar readership of a tweet from the surrounding quote tweets. Reach metrics change hourly, so capture the post, the replies and the counters on the day.

Intimate images and harassment under the Crimes Act

Section 97B of the Crimes Act 2011, inserted by the Crimes (Amendment) Act 2017, makes it an offence to disclose a private sexual photograph or film without the consent of the person who appears in it and with the intention of causing that person distress. It carries up to two years on indictment, or on summary conviction twelve months and a fine at level 5 on the standard scale. A prosecution depends on what can be shown to have been posted and sent. Reporting the account, or getting it suspended, removes the material and your proof of it at the same time, so capture the post, the profile and the message thread before you report to the Royal Gibraltar Police.

Fraud: no ombudsman, so it ends in court

Gibraltar has no financial services ombudsman, and the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission says plainly that it is not an arbitrator or a dispute resolution body. A disputed authorised push payment claim therefore ends in the Supreme Court rather than in a free scheme, which makes the quality of your evidence the whole of the case. GBC News reported Royal Gibraltar Police figures on 21 May 2026 showing fraud losses of £2.6 million already that year, with 87 per cent linked directly to cyber crime. Capture the site, the payment page, the dashboard and the chat while the account is still live, then report to the Economic Crime Unit.

Gambling complaints under the Gambling Act 2025

The Gambling Act 2025 commenced on 1 October 2025 with a six-month transition, replacing the twenty-year-old 2005 Act. It gives the Gambling Division wider powers to inspect, to approve senior managers and to fine. What has not changed is that a player complaint is decided on documents: the terms as they read on the day you accepted them, the bet history, the balance and the support chat. Operators edit terms pages and close accounts without notice, so seal those before you complain rather than after. The full complaint route and its two deadlines are set out below.

Small claims: you are the one presenting the evidence

The small claims track in the Supreme Court handles claims up to £10,000, and the fast track runs from there to £15,000. Small claims are designed to be run without a lawyer, which means you are the one who has to satisfy the court that the listing, the invoice page or the chat you are relying on is what you say it is. A ProofSnap package answers that on its face: hashes, an RSA-4096 signed manifest, a chain of custody and a verification script the other side can run, rather than a picture you are asking the judge to take on trust.

Gaming disputes

The site you are arguing with is probably licensed here

Gibraltar is one of the two jurisdictions that licensed the modern online betting industry, and it is still where a large part of it sits. Industry estimates published in 2025 and 2026 put the gaming sector at between a fifth and a third of Gibraltar's GDP, with more than 3,200 people employed in it, and the members of the Gibraltar Betting and Gaming Association include Bet365, Betfair, Ladbrokes and William Hill. If you are in a dispute with a UK-facing bookmaker or casino, there is a good chance the licence, the servers and the compliance team are in Gibraltar even when the website is not.

Two weeks, then the Commissioner

Complain to the operator first. Expect an acknowledgement in two to three working days and an explanation within a week. If you are still dissatisfied after two weeks, the Gambling Commissioner will consider it on the basis of the Complaint Resolution Request Form and the evidence you attach.

Where you played decides who hears it

The Commissioner's own guidance is explicit: for remote gambling licensed in both Gibraltar and the UK, where the gambling took place in the UK after 1 November 2014, the complaint can be referred to Gibraltar only with the operator's agreement. Otherwise it runs through the UK ADR procedure instead.

Two years, and then nothing

Complaints older than two years are not investigated except in exceptional circumstances. In practice the account, the bet history and the terms page you would rely on are gone long before that, because operators archive closed accounts and edit terms without notice.

The Commissioner asks complainants to keep the emails, the screenshots and the game records, and to set out the facts with full candour rather than selectively. That is exactly the point where a screenshot is weakest: it shows what you say the page said, on a date you say it said it, with nothing behind either claim. Capture the bonus or withdrawal terms as they read on the day you accepted them, the bet and transaction history, the balance, the verification requests and the closure notice, and the file answers both questions on its face.

The pressure on this sector is real and current: at the Autumn Budget 2025 the UK announced that Remote Gaming Duty would rise from 21 per cent to 40 per cent from 1 April 2026, and because the duty follows the customer rather than the operator, it lands on Gibraltar-licensed, UK-facing businesses. Restructurings and account migrations are the moments when player records move or disappear.

Evidence for a gambling dispute What to attach to the complaint

Just one dispute? You do not need a subscription.

If you are dealing with a single scam or one bad actor, a one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal, and no trial. Or send us the link and our team captures the court-ready package for you, no install required.

See SnapPack pricing We capture it for you

Guides for Gibraltar matters

Pick the forum you are dealing with

Each guide covers what the decision-maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.

Gambling operator disputes

Two weeks with the operator, then the Commissioner. Preserve the terms, the bet history and the balance first.

Chat messages as evidence

WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal and Messenger threads, rendered as a transcript you can exhibit to a witness statement.

Email threads

Headers and attachments certified, which is what an invoice redirection fraud turns on.

Social media posts

What to capture on a defamation or harassment matter, including the reach metrics that drive damages.

eIDAS qualified timestamps

What Article 41 actually presumes, what it does not, and how a court checks the token offline.

For barristers and solicitors

How the package is exhibited, what survives a notice to prove under CPR 32.19, and whitelabel PDFs.

"For the purposes of Articles 25(2), 27, 35(2), 37, 41(2) and 43(2) ... anything which is not qualified under this Regulation is to be treated as qualified if it is qualified under the equivalent EU law."

Article 24A of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as it has effect in Gibraltar, version in force from 1 January 2021, published on the Gibraltar Laws database. Article 41(2) is named in that list, which is why a qualified time stamp from an EU qualified trust service provider carries the Gibraltar presumption without any further argument about cross-border recognition.

Four steps to preserve web evidence for a Gibraltar forum

The order matters, because a Gibraltar case is built on documents disclosed long before trial, and because the online record you are relying on can be edited or deleted at any point in between.

  1. Capture before you complain or report. A takedown, a suspended account, a closed gaming account or an edited terms page removes the very thing you need to prove. Capture the page, the profile and the thread first, then go to the operator, the platform or the police.
  2. Keep the package, not the picture. A screenshot is a picture of a claim. A ProofSnap package is the screenshot plus the page source, the DOM text, the SHA-256 hashes, the RSA-4096 signed manifest, the public key, the chain of custody and the verification scripts, 11 to 15 files depending on your plan.
  3. Add the qualified timestamp where the date is contested. Article 41(2), as it has effect in Gibraltar, gives a qualified electronic time stamp the presumption of the accuracy of its date and time and of the integrity of the data bound to it, and Article 24A extends that to a time stamp qualified under equivalent EU law. The other side then has to displace a presumption with evidence rather than with an assertion.
  4. Disclose it in the form the forum uses. In the Supreme Court that means the document exhibited to a witness statement, where CPR 32.19 deems authenticity admitted unless a notice to prove is served. Before the Employment Tribunal or the Gambling Commissioner it means the written file. Attach the signed PDF and the ZIP, and give the decision-maker the Trust Verifier link so they can check it themselves.

Gibraltar is a separate jurisdiction from England and Wales, with its own statutes and its own Supreme Court, so treat English guidance as persuasive rather than binding. For neighbouring jurisdictions, see ProofSnap in the United Kingdom, Spain or Malta.

Official Gibraltar sources

The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than taking our word for it.

  • Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as it has effect in Gibraltar: published on the Gibraltar Laws database, version in force from 1 January 2021. Article 41(1) prevents an electronic time stamp being denied admissibility solely because it is in electronic form. Article 41(2) carries the presumption of accurate date and time and of data integrity. Article 24A treats anything qualified under equivalent EU law as qualified for the purposes of Article 41(2).
  • Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions Regulations 2017: made under the Electronic Commerce Act 2001. Regulation 4 assigns the role of supervisory body to the Gibraltar Regulatory Authority. The amendment history recorded against the retained Regulation on the same database shows the EU Exit amendment, LN 2019/221, which adapted it for Gibraltar once outside the Union, and the resulting version in force from 1 January 2021.
  • Electronic Commerce Act 2001: the framework Act under which the trust services regulations are made, and which provides that a contract may be concluded by the transmission of offer and acceptance through electronic means.
  • Crimes Act 2011, section 97B: inserted by the Crimes (Amendment) Act 2017 (No. 5 of 2017). It is an offence to disclose a private sexual photograph or film without the consent of an individual who appears in it and with the intention of causing that individual distress. Up to two years on indictment, or twelve months and a fine at level 5 on summary conviction.
  • Defamation Act 1960: Gibraltar did not enact an equivalent of the English Defamation Act 2013, so there is no statutory serious harm threshold and the common law test applies. The limitation period is six years under section 8 of the Limitation Act 1960, and Gibraltar has not adopted the shorter English period.
  • Gambling Act 2025: commenced on 1 October 2025 with a six-month transitional period, replacing the Gambling Act 2005. It widens the Gambling Division's powers of inspection, senior manager approval and financial penalty, and creates a Gambling Appeals Tribunal.
  • Gambling Division, complaints guidance: complain to the operator first, expect acknowledgement within two to three working days and an explanation within a week, escalate to the Gambling Commissioner if you are still dissatisfied after two weeks, keep emails, screenshots and game records, and note that complaints older than two years are generally not investigated.
  • Gibraltar Financial Services Commission, consumer guidance on fraud: the GFSC is not an ombudsman, an arbitrator or a dispute resolution body. There is no financial services ombudsman in Gibraltar, so a disputed payment that the provider refuses to reimburse has to be litigated.
  • Royal Gibraltar Police, report a crime: fraud and cyber-enabled crime are handled by the Economic Crime Unit, which comprises the Fraud Squad and the Money Laundering Investigation Unit.
  • GBC News, 21 May 2026, on Royal Gibraltar Police fraud figures: fraud losses of £2.6 million so far in 2026, of which 87 per cent are linked directly to cyber crime.
  • HM Government, gambling duty changes, 26 November 2025: the Autumn Budget 2025 measure raising Remote Gaming Duty from 21 per cent to 40 per cent for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2026. The duty follows the customer, so it reaches Gibraltar-licensed operators serving the United Kingdom.
  • Gibraltar Courts Service, published judgments: where the Supreme Court decisions cited on this page can be read in full, including the defamation judgments on jury trial and on the extent of publication.
  • Gibraltar Federation of Small Businesses on the small claims track: the Supreme Court small claims jurisdiction generally covers claims up to £10,000 and is designed to be usable without a lawyer, with the fast track running from £10,000 to £15,000.

Don't trust us. Trust the maths.

Three vendor approaches. One critical difference.

Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.

ProofSnap Page Vault / Pagefreezer Notary / Wayback Machine
Verifiable without the vendor? Yes, SHA-256 + OpenTimestamps work forever No, verification requires their portal No, depends on archive availability
What if the vendor disappears? Evidence still valid Evidence becomes hard to defend Wayback can be wiped on request
Independent court-expert verification Any IT expert, in 60 seconds Requires vendor cooperation Requires manual screenshot
Cryptographic proof in the file itself Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) Proprietary format None
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
Spanish IP lawyer using ProofSnap
Verify a sample evidence package yourself

No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP

View the open-source verifier on GitHub

See ProofSnap in Action

Watch how ProofSnap captures legally admissible web evidence with blockchain timestamping in just 41 seconds.

ProofSnap demo: a screenshot is not evidence, see what a signed capture contains
1:28

Learn how ProofSnap creates court-admissible digital evidence in 41 seconds

Click to watch on YouTube

What you get in 41 seconds

One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.

Visual Evidence

screenshot.jpeg

Full-page scrolling capture of the entire web page

evidence.pdf

Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata

Complete Page Data

page.html

Complete HTML source code of the page

domtextcontent.txt

Extracted visible text content

metadata.json

URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate

Forensic Integrity

forensic_log.json

ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain

chain_of_custody.json

Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification

Cryptographic Proof

manifest.json

SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package

manifest.sig

RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest

publickey.pem

Public key for independent signature verification

Blockchain Timestamp

manifest.json.ots

OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain

Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Cannot be forged or backdated. Independently verifiable by anyone.

Provenance Certificate

provenance_certificate.pdf

Anti-deepfake certificate with 8 integrity checks proving the evidence is an unaltered original

c2pa.json

C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA / Content Authenticity Initiative tools and aligned with EU AI Act Art. 50

As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest prove your capture is authentic, not AI-generated or manipulated. Required under EU AI Act Art. 50 (Aug 2026).

Video of Capture

capture_video.webm

Screen recording included in the evidence package, three modes:

  • Auto: records the capture process (~60s), page scroll, screenshots, metadata extraction.
  • Manual: press Start before playing media on the page (live stream, infringer video, deepfake), Stop & Capture when done. Up to 5 min on Essential / Pro, 10 min on Enterprise / Company.
  • Session: multi-tab. Records continuously while you browse across multiple tabs, then bundles a per-tab forensic package for every visited tab (full-page screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) into one signed ZIP.

All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, so any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.

SESSION CAPTURE

Multi-tab forensics in one ZIP

Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.

Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.

See exactly what a court receives

Download Sample Evidence Package

Open the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we'll capture it for you free of charge (the URL must be publicly accessible, with no login, paywall or geo-block).

The burden of proof, reversed under eIDAS Article 41

ProofSnap's eIDAS qualified timestamps shift the legal burden. Gibraltar kept Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as domestic law after EU exit, so Article 41 still applies here. Under Article 41 your evidence is legally presumed accurate as to its time and integrity, and the opposing party must prove otherwise.

Article 41(1): "An electronic time stamp shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic time stamp."

Article 41(2): "A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound."

Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Article 41, paragraphs 1 and 2. Quoted verbatim from EUR-Lex. Because Gibraltar retained this Regulation as domestic law, the presumption in Article 41(2) arises before a Gibraltar court, and Article 24A extends it to a time stamp qualified under equivalent EU law.

With ProofSnap eIDAS timestamp

  • Opponent must prove your evidence is fake
  • Legal presumption of accuracy (eIDAS Art. 41)
  • Automatically recognised in all 27 EU member states
  • No expert witness needed to explain the technology
  • Dual timestamp: eIDAS qualified + Bitcoin blockchain

Regular screenshot or blockchain-only

  • You must prove your evidence is real
  • No legal presumption, judge decides case by case
  • Court recognition varies by country
  • May need an expert witness to explain the blockchain
  • A deepfake objection can sink the whole exhibit

eIDAS qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Flexible Plans for Every Stage

Choose your plan and activate it directly in the app.

→ Save 20%

Essential (Annual)

$8.99approx. £6.70

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 100

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 5/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

Regular use, archiving

Most Popular

Professional (Annual)

$16.99approx. £12.70

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 200

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: 15/mo
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation

Premium

Enterprise (Annual)

$28.99approx. £21.60

per month

Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 50/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 10/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows

Company Plans

Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.

Best Value

Annual

$190approx. £142
/licence/year

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within 1 business day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises

Monthly

$18.99approx. £14.20
/licence/month

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within 1 business day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

Flexible monthly billing for teams

No subscription? Pay-as-you-go SnapPacks.

One-off purchase, no auto-renewal. Credits are valid for 12 months (Standard SnapPack never expires).

Standard SnapPack

10 captures · no expiry

$4.99approx. £3.70

All features: export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.

eIDAS SnapPack

EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)

$24.99 / 5 stampsapprox. £18.60

$5.00 (approx. £3.70) / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 (approx. £5.20) or 10× $49.99 (approx. £37.30)

Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS Art. 41). Includes whitelabel branding on evidence PDF.

Video SnapPack

30-min recording with audio + bundled credits

$59.99 / 3 videosapprox. £44.70

$19.99 (approx. £14.90) / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 (approx. £18.60) or 10× $169.99 (approx. £127)

Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. Whitelabel branding included.

Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →

Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.

Start Free 7-Day Trial
4.8/5 on Chrome Web Store

Retained EU law, with the recognition already written in

Gibraltar sits in an unusual and useful position. It is a common law jurisdiction whose procedure follows England, yet it kept the eIDAS Regulation as domestic law when it left the Union with the United Kingdom. So you get an English-style trial with a civil-law style presumption attached to the timestamp, and the Gibraltar Regulatory Authority as the supervisory body for trust services.

Article 41 applies as retained Gibraltar law

A qualified electronic time stamp enjoys the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound. That provision is in force here as retained domestic law, and a timestamp issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, is treated as qualified in Gibraltar under Article 24A, which names Article 41(2) among the provisions it covers.

CPR 32.19, the notice to prove

The English Civil Procedure Rules apply in Gibraltar with local modifications under the Supreme Court Rules 2000. Under CPR 32.19 the authenticity of a disclosed document is deemed admitted unless the other side serves a notice to prove it, which must be served by the latest date for serving witness statements or within seven days of disclosure, whichever is later. Once that notice is served, the burden of proving authenticity sits with the party relying on the document. A signed and timestamped package answers it from the file itself, instead of putting a witness in the box to say the screenshot is genuine.

A small jurisdiction with a large online economy

Industry estimates published in 2025 and 2026 put gaming at a fifth to a third of Gibraltar's GDP, employing more than 3,200 people, and financial services add another layer of regulated online activity. That means an unusual share of disputes here are about what a website, a terms page or a platform account said on a particular day.

Deadlines run in both directions

Three months less a day to file an unfair dismissal claim. Two weeks before a gambling complaint can go to the Commissioner, and a two-year outer limit beyond which it will generally not be looked at. Six years for defamation, which is the opposite problem: your evidence has to stay verifiable for that whole period.

What the presumption does and does not do: it goes to the accuracy of the time and the integrity of the data, not to admissibility in the round or to the truth of what the page said. A Gibraltar court still weighs the evidence. What the timestamp removes is the argument about when the capture was made and whether it changed afterwards, which in practice is the argument you would otherwise be having.

Prices are charged in USD. The approximate sterling figure shown under each price is for orientation only, converted at about £0.75 to US$1. Your card issuer sets the actual rate on the day. The 7-day trial requires a credit card. Prefer not to subscribe? A one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal and no trial.

Evidence capture service

Not the DIY type? We capture it for you.

For one-off legal disputes and single fraud reports, or for anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall, or geo-block). We deliver the same 15-file court-ready package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), video and audio recording of the capture, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor. Not sure what will hold up? Tell us your situation and we’ll advise on the strongest evidence package for your case.

Web capture · you send a URL

Single Capture

1 URL · delivered in 24 hours

$44.99approx. £33.50
  • Video + audio recording
  • Multi-tab session
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp
  • Bitcoin blockchain anchor
  • 15-file ZIP + PDF court bundle
Order Single $44.99 (approx. £33.50)
Best value

Evidence Pack

Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 24 hours

$149 · $29.80 (approx. £22.20) / URLapprox. £111
  • All features from Single, ×5
  • Unified chain of custody
  • Takedown bundles & fraud chains
  • Single ZIP + per-URL PDFs
  • 33% bundle discount vs. ×5 Single
Order Evidence Pack $149 (approx. £111)

File certification · you send the files

Already have the evidence as files? We authenticate chat exports, recordings, and documents as-is. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.

File Certification

1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours

$59.99approx. £44.70
  • Files you already have (chat export, document, audio, video)
  • One evidence item can be several related files
  • Readable transcript rendered (chat exports)
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp + Bitcoin anchor
  • Signed ZIP + certificate PDF
Order File Certification · $59.99 (approx. £44.70)

Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.

Need more info, or have a detailed URL list to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.

See full comparison & FAQ →

Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works in your jurisdiction on WhatsApp evidence by country, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.

Who Uses ProofSnap and Why

Legal professionals icon

Barristers, solicitors, auditors and compliance teams

Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance

  • Timestamped snapshots for dispute resolution
  • Audit-ready exports for regulatory filings
  • Cryptographic hash for integrity
  • Contract and employment disputes
Legal professional testimonial for ProofSnap
"Screenshots aren't enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need."
Legal Professional
Journalist icon

Journalists & Digital Investigators

Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research

  • Capture controversial posts or deleted pages
  • Export as PDF or ZIP for transparency
  • Embed source URL, timestamp, browser context
  • Digital forensics, website changes, online harassment
Journalist testimonial for ProofSnap
"ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it's edited, censored, or erased."
Investigative Journalist
HR professionals icon

HR Managers, Recruiters, Visa Officers, Talent Ops

Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records

  • LinkedIn profile snapshots for candidate verification, post validation, and prevention of profile falsification
  • Timestamped proof for employment validation and visa processing
  • Archive candidate documents for compliance and audit
  • Save snapshots of onboarding portals and signed contracts
  • HR archiving, onboarding version control, and data integrity
HR professional testimonial for ProofSnap evidence capture
"It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews."
HR Director
Anyone icon

Anyone Who Needs Trusted Snapshots

Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later

  • Save pricing pages, policies, receipts
  • Archive agreements or service terms
  • Use for personal records or disputes
  • Online casino bonus terms, payout disputes, gambling chargebacks
  • Exportable, portable, legally meaningful
Individual user testimonial for ProofSnap web evidence tool
"I don't just save what I see, I save what it means."
OSINT Researcher

Resources & Insights

Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.

NEW 2026 Deepfake Defence

How Evidence Survives Deepfake Objections Under FRE 707

Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks. Case law: Mendones v. Cushman (2025). FRE 707, Louisiana Act 250, EU AI Act Art. 50.

8 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Evidence Authentication

How to Authenticate Web Evidence That Survives Cross-Examination

Screenshots fail under FRE 901. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, ISO 27037 chain of custody, and open-source verification survive. Case law, Page Vault comparison.

7 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Divorce & Custody

Divorce & Custody: How to Capture Social Media Evidence for Court

81% of divorce lawyers report a surge in social media evidence (AAML). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and dating apps before they disappear. Family law and ancillary relief proceedings. eIDAS Article 41.

14 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying Evidence: How to Document It for Police & Court

46% of teens cyberbullied. Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. Gibraltar, UK, EU and US law.

12 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Brand Protection

Brand Protection for E-Commerce: Amazon, Temu & Global Marketplaces

$467B counterfeit trade. Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. US Lanham Act, EU DSA, eIDAS 2, FRE 901. Case law & evidence playbook.

35 min read Read article
NEW 2026 OSINT

OSINT 101: Preserve Social Media Evidence Before It’s Deleted

X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. FRE 901 authentication, blockchain timestamps, GDPR, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQs. OSINT guide.

40 min read Read article
View all articles →

Frequently Asked Questions

Contact Us

Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.

Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com

Start your 7-day free trial