Visual Evidence
screenshot.jpeg
Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage
evidence.pdf
Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata
ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures a web page as evidence for courts in England and Wales. Every capture carries a SHA-256 hash and an RSA-4096 signature, with a Bitcoin timestamp from Professional up and eIDAS timestamps on Enterprise, Company and eIDAS SnapPacks. When a notice to prove arrives, the answer is in the file.
Tamper-evident cryptographic evidence built for court: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, capture video, Provenance Certificate. One click, and anyone can verify the package without us.
From $8.99/month (about £7) · 11 to 15 files per package · Provenance Certificate with 6 integrity checks
Also available for Microsoft Edge · Qualified eIDAS timestamps, recognised under UK assimilated law
No account, nothing to set up.
Download a real evidence package. Open the PDF, read the chain of custody, then drop the whole ZIP into the Trust Verifier and watch it check the hashes, the signature and the timestamps in front of you.
Download the sample package9.4 MB ZIP. No account, no email address, nothing to install.
You send a link or the files. We send back a signed, timestamped package a UK court can check, within 24 hours.
A chat export is the file the app gives you when you tap Export chat. We render it as a readable transcript, hash every file and timestamp the result, so the other side cannot argue the messages were edited.
ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures any web page as court-ready digital evidence for UK proceedings. Each capture is hashed with SHA-256, signed with RSA-4096 and timestamped by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, whose timestamps UK assimilated law treats as qualified here.
ProofSnap captures a page in one click. Three capture options: single page, multi-tab browsing session (with per-tab forensic packages), or signed video proof (Auto, Manual, or Session-wide screen recording). Every capture includes a SHA-256 cryptographic hash, RSA-4096 digital signature, Bitcoin blockchain timestamp via OpenTimestamps, and a Provenance Certificate with 6 integrity checks for deepfake detection.
In the United Kingdom the presumption arises as a matter of UK domestic law, not because EU law applies here. The trust services chapter of eIDAS was kept in domestic law on withdrawal, and an EU qualified timestamp is treated as qualified here, so it carries a rebuttable presumption of the accuracy of the date and time and of the integrity of the data bound to them.
In England and Wales the rest of the framework is ordinary evidence law. Section 8 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995 governs proof of statements in documents, section 9 covers business records, and under the Civil Procedure Rules the authenticity of a disclosed document is deemed admitted unless the other side serves a notice to prove the document. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own evidence statutes. Our guide to qualified timestamps for UK courts works through this in detail. The same signed package strengthens a tenancy deposit adjudication, an APP fraud reimbursement claim, an employment tribunal bundle or a defamation letter of claim. Qualified timestamps are available on Enterprise and Company plans or through an eIDAS SnapPack, and that package carries the eIDAS presumption of the accuracy of the date and time. Pricing starts at $8.99/month (about £7) with a 7-day free trial requiring a credit card. Used by lawyers, short-term rental hosts, copyright-enforcement firms and compliance teams.
By Radim Motycka, Founder & Lead Engineer, ProofSnap · · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier
Trusted by professionals at
Powered by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List. Verify on EU Trusted List.
A screenshot fails on authentication: nothing in the image shows when it was taken or that it has not been altered since. In England and Wales that leaves the court weighing reliability under section 4 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995, with no presumption in your favour.
File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.
Any screenshot can be edited in 10 seconds with AI. In Mendones v Cushman & Wakefield Inc, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Judge Victoria Kolakowski dismissed the action with prejudice on 9 September 2025 after finding the video evidence had been generated by AI. Without a SHA-256 hash, there's no way to prove yours is real.
Who captured it? When? On what device? How was it stored? Screenshots do not answer any of these questions. The other side can put authenticity in issue by serving a notice to prove under CPR 32.19, and a screenshot gives you nothing to answer it with.
Your screenshot
ProofSnap evidence package
Built for how disputes start in England and Wales
Most disputes in England and Wales never reach a courtroom. They are decided by a deposit adjudicator who never holds a hearing, by a bank assessing a reimbursement claim, by an employment tribunal, where the claim has to be brought within three months less one day, or by a platform acting on a takedown request. Whether you are submitting evidence to a deposit adjudication, claiming APP fraud reimbursement, or proving serious harm in a defamation letter of claim, ProofSnap locks the record in seconds, with a signed PDF, a SHA-256 hash and an eIDAS qualified timestamp that holds up when the other side says “that screenshot is fake”.
Deposit adjudication is the purest documents-only process in English law: no hearing, no visit to the property, a short window for each side to submit evidence, and a decision on the balance of probabilities. A letting agent who claims the listing never promised that is far harder to believe when set against a hashed, timestamped capture. See the detail in our guide to tenancy deposit dispute evidence.
English law no longer presumes damage. Section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 provides that “a statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant”, and section 1(2) requires a body trading for profit to show serious financial loss. The section extends to England and Wales. You have one year from publication. Capture the post, the account and the reach while the page is live, because a deleted post is a deleted case. See our guide to defamation and serious harm evidence.
In its 2025 annual report the Revenge Porn Helpline, run by SWGfL, recorded over 450,000 intimate images removed since 2015 across 85,000 cases, with a removal rate above 94 per cent, and StopNCII uses a hash to block images across partnered platforms. Both work, and both end with your proof gone. Capture it first, report second, as explained in our guide to intimate image takedown evidence.
Since 7 October 2024 payment firms must reimburse victims of authorised push payment fraud up to £85,000, with the cost shared evenly between the sending and receiving firms, and you have 13 months to claim. The entitlement is new; proving what you were shown is not. Our guide to APP fraud reimbursement evidence sets out what to capture and in what order.
If you are dealing with a single scam or one bad actor, a one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal, and no trial. Or send us the link and our team captures the court-ready package for you, no installation required.
Guides for UK matters
Each guide covers the deadlines that apply, what the decision maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.
Up to £85,000 and 13 months to claim. The site is gone in days.
No hearing, no visit, a short deadline to submit evidence. The documents are the case.
Damage is no longer presumed, and you have one year from publication.
Takedowns work, and a takedown is the moment your proof disappears.
Three months less one day, with Acas conciliation stopping the clock.
How an EU qualified timestamp works under UK assimilated law.
Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own rules of evidence and their own defamation regimes, so treat the England and Wales detail on these pages as a starting point rather than the last word. Different country entirely? See ProofSnap in Canada, Australia or New Zealand, or Ireland, where eIDAS applies directly as EU law rather than through assimilated law.
A screenshot is not rejected for being a screenshot. It loses because nobody can answer these five questions from the file itself. A ProofSnap package answers all five from the file, so the witness statement has something to exhibit rather than something to recall.
The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than taking our word for it.
Don't trust us. Trust the maths.
Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.
| ProofSnap | Page Vault / Pagefreezer | Notary / Wayback Machine | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verifiable without the vendor? | Yes. SHA-256 and OpenTimestamps need no service of ours to verify | No, verification requires their portal | No, depends on archive availability |
| What if the vendor disappears? | Evidence still valid | Evidence becomes hard to defend | Wayback can be wiped on request |
| Independent court-expert verification | Any competent examiner, with the scripts in the package | Requires vendor cooperation | Requires manual screenshot |
| Cryptographic proof in the file itself | Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) | Proprietary format | None |
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP
Watch how ProofSnap captures court-ready web evidence with blockchain timestamping in one click.
Learn how ProofSnap creates court-admissible digital evidence in one click
Click to watch on YouTube
One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.
screenshot.jpeg
Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage
evidence.pdf
Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata
page.html
Complete HTML source code of the page
domtextcontent.txt
Extracted visible text content
metadata.json
URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate
forensic_log.json
ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain
chain_of_custody.json
Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification
manifest.json
SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package
manifest.sig
RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest
publickey.pem
Public key for independent signature verification
manifest.json.ots
OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain
Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Backdating it would be detectable. Independently verifiable by anyone.
provenance_certificate.pdf
Anti-deepfake certificate with 6 integrity checks proving the evidence is an unaltered original
c2pa.json
C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA and Content Authenticity Initiative tools
As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest record how the capture was made and document eight integrity checks on it, covering AI generation and manipulation.
capture_video.webm
Screen recording included in the evidence package, in three modes:
All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, so any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.
manifest.json.tsr
EU qualified timestamp (RFC 3161), carrying the eIDAS presumption of the accuracy of the date and time.
Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.
Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.
See exactly what a court receives
Download Sample Evidence PackageOpen the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we'll capture it for you free of charge (URL must be publicly accessible, no login, paywall, or geo-block).
Independent legal opinion · 21 April 2026
The opinion was prepared by SEDLAKOVA LEGAL s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Bar Association, company registration number 05669871) under EU law (Regulation 910/2014, eIDAS) with reference to Czech civil procedure. Cross-references to the Civil Procedure Rules of England and Wales (CPR Parts 32 and 35) were added by the ProofSnap team to orient common-law readers.
CPR 32.19 · The eIDAS presumption
ProofSnap outputs are usable as evidence in civil, criminal and administrative proceedings. The package is built to answer the authentication question a court puts to digital evidence: under the Civil Procedure Rules in England and Wales, under the Federal Rules of Evidence in proceedings in the United States, and where a civil-law court assesses the evidence at large.
Notarial deed · Notary public
The opinion describes ProofSnap as “a suitable and economical alternative” to a notarial certificate recording the state of a website. A notary in England and Wales charges per document, typically in the low hundreds of pounds, and the appointment involves a delay during which the page you are trying to preserve can be edited or taken down. There is a deeper problem than cost: a notary attests what was shown to them on the day and cannot revisit the page later, so nothing in a notarial certificate lets anyone check by computation that the file you produce months afterwards is the file that was certified. ProofSnap captures immediately, and does it more cheaply and more quickly than having a web page notarised, and every hash in the package can be recomputed by the other side at any point.
The eIDAS presumption · Regulation (EU) 910/2014
The qualified eIDAS timestamp issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, carries a rebuttable statutory presumption of the accuracy of the date and time and of data integrity. It takes effect in the United Kingdom through the assimilated Regulation.
“The outputs of the ProofSnap service are, from the perspective of Czech procedural law and the EU legal framework, generally usable as means of evidence in any type of proceedings.”
Conclusion of the legal opinion, SEDLAKOVA LEGAL s.r.o., 21 April 2026
The opinion is publicly accessible and no registration is required. The conclusions express the legal view of their author and do not constitute binding legal advice.
A ProofSnap eIDAS qualified timestamp changes what the other side has to argue. Article 41(2) of Regulation (EU) 910/2014, as it has effect in UK assimilated law and extended to EU qualified services by Article 24A, gives the timestamp a rebuttable presumption of the accuracy of the date and time and of the integrity of the data, so the party disputing it has to displace that presumption.
There is a second presumption in English law that matters more to digital evidence than most people realise, and it is currently under review. Since 2000, courts have worked from a common law rebuttable presumption that a computer was operating correctly at the material time, so the party relying on computer-generated material does not have to prove the system worked. The Post Office Horizon scandal is what that presumption looks like when it fails at scale.
On 21 January 2025 the Ministry of Justice opened a call for evidence on the use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings, asking whether the presumption remains appropriate, how computer evidence should be defined, and whether legislation is needed. The British Computer Society welcomed the review. The call for evidence closed on 15 April 2025 and, as at August 2026, no government response has been published. Whatever replaces the presumption, the direction of travel is clear: courts will want to see why a piece of computer output should be believed, rather than simply assuming that it should be.
That is an argument for evidence built the way ours is, not against it. A ProofSnap package does not ask a court to presume anything about the machine that made it. The hashes can be recomputed, the signature checks out against a public key that travels with the package, the OpenTimestamps proof anchors to the Bitcoin blockchain and the qualified timestamp verifies against the EU Trusted List. The other side's expert can run every one of those checks on their own hardware, years later, without relying on any presumption.
eIDAS qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List. Verify on EU Trusted List.
Choose your plan and activate it directly in the app.
per month
Monthly Snapshots: 100
Regular use, archiving
per month
Monthly Snapshots: 200
Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation
Premium
per month
Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited
1 stamp during trial
High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows
Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.
Minimum 2 licences
1 stamp during trial
Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises
Minimum 2 licences
1 stamp during trial
Flexible monthly billing for teams
One-off purchase, no auto-renewal. Credits valid for 12 months (Standard SnapPack never expires).
10 captures · no expiry
All features: export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.
EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)
$5.00 / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 (about £5.25) or 10× $49.99 (about £37)
Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS). Includes white-label branding on evidence PDF.
75-min recording with audio + bundled credits
$20.00 (about £15) / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 (about £19) or 10× $169.99 (about £127)
Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. White-label branding included.
Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →
Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.
This is the part most people get backwards, so it is worth being precise. The United Kingdom retained the trust services chapter of eIDAS in domestic law, and Article 24A of that assimilated Regulation treats a service qualified under EU law as qualified here. The recognition is asymmetrical, and it runs in your favour.
Article 41(2) applies here
Article 41(2) as it has effect in UK law reads: “A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.” It was carried across into UK law with the rest of the trust services chapter. The presumption is rebuttable.
EU providers are recognised in the UK (Article 24A)
Article 24A of the assimilated Regulation provides that, for the purposes of Article 41(2) among others, anything not qualified under the UK Regulation is to be treated as qualified if “it is qualified under the equivalent EU law”. So an EU qualified timestamp works here. The reverse is not true: UK providers lost qualified status in the EU. Our timestamps come from Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List.
CPR 32.19 decides who has to prove what
CPR 32.19(1): “A party shall be deemed to admit the authenticity of a document disclosed to him under Part 31 unless he serves notice that he wishes the document to be proved at trial.” By 32.19(2) that notice is due by the latest date for serving witness statements or within 7 days of disclosure, whichever is later. A record that is obviously verifiable is a record nobody bothers to challenge. These are the rules of England and Wales.
Civil Evidence Act 1995 (England and Wales)
Section 8(1) lets a statement in a document be proved by producing the document or a copy “authenticated in such manner as the court may approve”, and section 9(1) lets a document forming part of the records of a business or public authority be received “without further proof”, with section 9(4) defining records as records in whatever form. Section 16(4) limits the Act to England and Wales.
Section 4 is where a ProofSnap package earns its weight
Section 4(1) says that in estimating the weight of hearsay evidence “the court shall have regard to any circumstances from which any inference can reasonably be drawn as to the reliability or otherwise of the evidence”, and section 4(2) then lists six factors. Three of them are exactly what a signed capture answers on the face of the file: whether the statement was made contemporaneously with the matters stated, whether anyone involved had a motive to conceal or misrepresent, and whether the account was edited. A ProofSnap package carries a qualified timestamp for the first, a chain of custody for the second and a SHA-256 hash over every file for the third.
What the presumption does and does not do: it goes to the accuracy of the time and the integrity of the data, not to admissibility in the round. A court still applies the CPR and the Civil Evidence Act, and still weighs the evidence. What the timestamp removes is the argument about when the capture was made and whether it changed afterwards, which in practice is the argument you would otherwise be having. It does not authenticate the exhibit, prove what the page said, prove the capture was complete or identify who made it, so a witness statement under CPR Part 32 is still required. Filling that gap is the job of the rest of the package: the screenshot, the HTML, the DOM text, the chain of custody and the forensic log. This reflects the position as at 5 September 2026. The recognition is real but revocable in principle, and the sources below set out the instrument that would do it. Parliament has so far moved the other way, with section 130 inserting Article 24B to recognise EU conformity assessment bodies. England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are separate jurisdictions with separate procedural rules, and the CPR references on this page are the rules of England and Wales.
Prices are charged in USD. The approximate sterling figure shown under each price is for orientation only, converted at roughly £0.75 to the US dollar. Your card issuer sets the actual rate on the day. The 7-day trial requires a credit card. Prefer not to subscribe? A one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal and no trial.
Done-for-You Service
For one-off legal disputes, single fraud reports, or anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall, or geo-block) and we deliver a 15-file court-ready package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), video and audio recording, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor, all included. Not sure what will hold up? Just tell us your situation and we’ll assemble the evidence package for your case.
Web capture · you send a URL
1 URL · delivered in 24 hours
Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 24 hours
File certification · you send the files
Already have the evidence as files? We hash, sign and timestamp chat exports, recordings and documents exactly as they are. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.
1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours
Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List.
Need more information or have a detailed URL list to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.
Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works in your jurisdiction on WhatsApp evidence by country, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.
Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance
“Screenshots aren't enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need.”
Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research
“ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it's edited, censored, or erased.”
Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records
“It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews.”
Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later
“I don't just save what I see, I save what it means.”
Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.
Provenance certificate with 8 integrity checks, and what a court asks once authenticity is disputed.
A bare screenshot proves nothing about its own origin. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, an ISO 27037 chain of custody and open-source verification do. Case law and what a court checks.
81% of divorce lawyers reported a surge in social networking evidence (AAML survey, 2010). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, dating apps before they disappear. Family court and financial remedy proceedings. CPR 32, eIDAS Article 41.
46% of US teens have experienced at least one cyberbullying behaviour (Pew Research Center, 2022). Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, EU laws.
$467bn in counterfeit trade. Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. US Lanham Act, EU DSA, eIDAS 2. Case law & evidence playbook.
X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. Authentication, blockchain timestamps, GDPR, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQ. OSINT guide.
Regular screenshots can be challenged in court because they carry no proof of when they were taken or whether they have been altered. In the United Kingdom the answer to that is unusually strong. The trust services chapter of eIDAS is now UK assimilated law, and Article 24A of the assimilated Regulation treats an EU qualified service as qualified here for the purposes of Article 41(2): a qualified electronic time stamp enjoys a rebuttable presumption of the accuracy of the date and time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which it is bound. Alongside that, in England and Wales the Civil Evidence Act 1995 governs proof of statements in documents and section 9 covers business records, while under the civil procedure rules the authenticity of a disclosed document is deemed admitted unless the other side serves a notice to prove it, by the deadline for witness statements or within 7 days of disclosure, whichever is later.
ProofSnap addresses this by creating a forensic evidence package containing a SHA-256 hash proving the content has not been modified, an RSA-4096 digital signature for authenticity, an eIDAS qualified timestamp issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, a Bitcoin blockchain anchor, and full metadata including the URL and the capture time in UTC. The presumption goes to the time and the integrity of the data rather than to admissibility in the round, so a court still applies the CPR and weighs the evidence. What it removes is the argument about when the capture was made and whether it changed afterwards.
Yes, and the small claims track is where it tends to matter most, because you present the evidence yourself with no solicitor to argue authenticity for you. Put the signed PDF in the bundle as your exhibit and keep the ZIP available. The PDF is readable on its own, so a district judge does not have to run anything to follow it, and the hashes and the manifest are there if the other side says the page never said what you claim.
The practical advantage is that a small claim is usually decided at a short hearing, on the documents the parties have filed. There is no time to reconstruct what a listing, an advert or a chat said months ago, and the party who can produce the page as it stood, with the date fixed by something other than their own word, is in a materially better position than the party describing it from memory. This describes the small claims track of the County Court in England and Wales; the simple procedure in Scotland and the small claims procedure in Northern Ireland are separate regimes.
No. Nothing in the Civil Procedure Rules or the law of evidence requires a web page to be notarised before a court in England and Wales will look at it. Under the notice-to-prove rule the authenticity of a disclosed document is deemed admitted unless the other side serves a notice to prove it, so in most cases the question never arises at all.
A notary helps only in a narrow band of cases, and it is worth understanding what one actually gets you. A notary attests what was shown to them, on the day, in their presence. They do not hash the file, so nothing in the certificate lets anyone check months later that the copy you are producing is byte-identical to the one that was certified. They charge per document, and getting an appointment takes long enough that a page can be edited or deleted while you wait.
A ProofSnap package attacks the same problem from the other end and does so in seconds: a SHA-256 hash of every file, an RSA-4096 signed manifest, the public key in the package, a chain of custody, an OpenTimestamps anchor and, where the plan includes it, a qualified timestamp carrying the eIDAS presumption in UK assimilated law. If your matter needs a notary for some separate reason, the two are not alternatives and you can do both.
Whether to apply is a question for your solicitor. What to preserve first is not, and it is the step that gets skipped. An application to identify an anonymous poster takes weeks, and the account can be deleted before the order is granted, whether by the poster, the platform or a moderator. If that happens you may end up with an order and nothing left to attach it to.
Capture the material before you do anything that alerts the poster: the post itself, the full thread or comment chain around it, the account profile with its handle, display name, join date, follower count and any other posts you may need, and the URL of each. Capture the page as it appears to the public rather than only to you. Do the same for any republication you have found, because reach matters to a defamation claim and a republication may be gone before disclosure. Then instruct your solicitor. The jurisdiction described here is England and Wales; the equivalent order in Scotland is sought under a different procedure.
ProofSnap uses three layers of cryptographic protection:
Together, these mechanisms create a chain of integrity that proves the evidence is authentic, unaltered, and was captured at a specific point in time.
The eIDAS 2 regulation (EU 2024/1183) will be fully rolled out by the end of 2026, establishing stricter standards for electronic identification, digital signatures, and qualified electronic timestamps across all EU member states.
Under Article 41, a qualified electronic timestamp enjoys a rebuttable presumption of accuracy for the date and time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the timestamp is linked, and Article 41(1) stops a timestamp being denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence merely because it is electronic. Admissibility itself still follows each court's own procedural rules, which in the United Kingdom means the CPR in England and Wales and the equivalent rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
ProofSnap's cryptographic proofs align with eIDAS 2 requirements: SHA-256 hashing for data integrity, RSA-4096 digital signatures for authenticity, and blockchain timestamps via OpenTimestamps for independent time verification. In the United Kingdom the recognition runs through the assimilated Regulation, not through eIDAS 2, which does not extend to the UK.
Forensic mode is an opt-in capture depth included in the Professional, Enterprise and Company plans (not in Essential or the SnapPacks).
Adds a complete archive of the page's network layer: every HTTP request and response (network.har), a WARC copy of the page, all loaded resources, and the full TLS certificate chain. To capture that it attaches the debugger (the browser shows a “being debugged” banner).
Every one of those files is hashed into the RSA-4096 signed manifest, so the OpenTimestamps blockchain anchor and the eIDAS qualified timestamp cover the network archive exactly as they cover the screenshot.
Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.
Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com