September 2025: A California judge threw out a case because the video evidence was a deepfake. Is your evidence tamper-evident?

Screenshots get challenged in court.
ProofSnap evidence gets checked.

ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures a web page as evidence for courts in England and Wales. Every capture carries a SHA-256 hash and an RSA-4096 signature, with a Bitcoin timestamp from Professional up and eIDAS timestamps on Enterprise, Company and eIDAS SnapPacks. When a notice to prove arrives, the answer is in the file.

Tamper-evident cryptographic evidence built for court: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, capture video, Provenance Certificate. One click, and anyone can verify the package without us.

From $8.99/month (about £7) · 11 to 15 files per package · Provenance Certificate with 6 integrity checks

ProofSnap Chrome extension side panel, capture page snapshot, record video, qualified timestamp (eIDAS), and Trust Verifier

Start without installing anything

No account, nothing to set up.

No signup

See exactly what a UK court receives

Download a real evidence package. Open the PDF, read the chain of custody, then drop the whole ZIP into the Trust Verifier and watch it check the hashes, the signature and the timestamps in front of you.

Download the sample package

9.4 MB ZIP. No account, no email address, nothing to install.

Or we do it for you

You send a link or the files. We send back a signed, timestamped package a UK court can check, within 24 hours.

A chat export is the file the app gives you when you tap Export chat. We render it as a readable transcript, hash every file and timestamp the result, so the other side cannot argue the messages were edited.

ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures any web page as court-ready digital evidence for UK proceedings. Each capture is hashed with SHA-256, signed with RSA-4096 and timestamped by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, whose timestamps UK assimilated law treats as qualified here.

ProofSnap captures a page in one click. Three capture options: single page, multi-tab browsing session (with per-tab forensic packages), or signed video proof (Auto, Manual, or Session-wide screen recording). Every capture includes a SHA-256 cryptographic hash, RSA-4096 digital signature, Bitcoin blockchain timestamp via OpenTimestamps, and a Provenance Certificate with 6 integrity checks for deepfake detection.

In the United Kingdom the presumption arises as a matter of UK domestic law, not because EU law applies here. The trust services chapter of eIDAS was kept in domestic law on withdrawal, and an EU qualified timestamp is treated as qualified here, so it carries a rebuttable presumption of the accuracy of the date and time and of the integrity of the data bound to them.

In England and Wales the rest of the framework is ordinary evidence law. Section 8 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995 governs proof of statements in documents, section 9 covers business records, and under the Civil Procedure Rules the authenticity of a disclosed document is deemed admitted unless the other side serves a notice to prove the document. Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own evidence statutes. Our guide to qualified timestamps for UK courts works through this in detail. The same signed package strengthens a tenancy deposit adjudication, an APP fraud reimbursement claim, an employment tribunal bundle or a defamation letter of claim. Qualified timestamps are available on Enterprise and Company plans or through an eIDAS SnapPack, and that package carries the eIDAS presumption of the accuracy of the date and time. Pricing starts at $8.99/month (about £7) with a 7-day free trial requiring a credit card. Used by lawyers, short-term rental hosts, copyright-enforcement firms and compliance teams.

· · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier

<1 min
Per capture
11-15
Files per evidence package
41(2)
eIDAS presumption of accuracy
7 days
Free trial, all features

Trusted by professionals at

A US State Attorney General's Office · Süddeutsche Zeitung · Coty Inc · Hogan Lovells

Powered by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Are screenshots admissible in a UK court?

A screenshot fails on authentication: nothing in the image shows when it was taken or that it has not been altered since. In England and Wales that leaves the court weighing reliability under section 4 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995, with no presumption in your favour.

No timestamp proof

File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.

No tampering detection

Any screenshot can be edited in 10 seconds with AI. In Mendones v Cushman & Wakefield Inc, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Judge Victoria Kolakowski dismissed the action with prejudice on 9 September 2025 after finding the video evidence had been generated by AI. Without a SHA-256 hash, there's no way to prove yours is real.

No chain of custody

Who captured it? When? On what device? How was it stored? Screenshots do not answer any of these questions. The other side can put authenticity in issue by serving a notice to prove under CPR 32.19, and a screenshot gives you nothing to answer it with.

Your screenshot

  • 1 JPEG file, no proof it's real
  • No timestamp, could have been taken at any time
  • Editable in Photoshop in 10 seconds
  • Judge: “Anyone could have made this”

ProofSnap evidence package

  • Up to 15 files, screenshot, HTML, metadata, forensic log
  • Blockchain timestamp, immutable proof of when it was captured
  • Video of capture + Provenance Certificate
  • Chain of custody, built for CPR 32.19 and the Civil Evidence Act 1995 (England and Wales)

Built for how disputes start in England and Wales

Capture it before they delete it

Most disputes in England and Wales never reach a courtroom. They are decided by a deposit adjudicator who never holds a hearing, by a bank assessing a reimbursement claim, by an employment tribunal, where the claim has to be brought within three months less one day, or by a platform acting on a takedown request. Whether you are submitting evidence to a deposit adjudication, claiming APP fraud reimbursement, or proving serious harm in a defamation letter of claim, ProofSnap locks the record in seconds, with a signed PDF, a SHA-256 hash and an eIDAS qualified timestamp that holds up when the other side says “that screenshot is fake”.

Deposit disputes: papers only

Deposit adjudication is the purest documents-only process in English law: no hearing, no visit to the property, a short window for each side to submit evidence, and a decision on the balance of probabilities. A letting agent who claims the listing never promised that is far harder to believe when set against a hashed, timestamped capture. See the detail in our guide to tenancy deposit dispute evidence.

Defamation: serious harm must be proved

English law no longer presumes damage. Section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 provides that “a statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant”, and section 1(2) requires a body trading for profit to show serious financial loss. The section extends to England and Wales. You have one year from publication. Capture the post, the account and the reach while the page is live, because a deleted post is a deleted case. See our guide to defamation and serious harm evidence.

Intimate image takedowns

In its 2025 annual report the Revenge Porn Helpline, run by SWGfL, recorded over 450,000 intimate images removed since 2015 across 85,000 cases, with a removal rate above 94 per cent, and StopNCII uses a hash to block images across partnered platforms. Both work, and both end with your proof gone. Capture it first, report second, as explained in our guide to intimate image takedown evidence.

APP fraud, and getting it back

Since 7 October 2024 payment firms must reimburse victims of authorised push payment fraud up to £85,000, with the cost shared evenly between the sending and receiving firms, and you have 13 months to claim. The entitlement is new; proving what you were shown is not. Our guide to APP fraud reimbursement evidence sets out what to capture and in what order.

Just one dispute? You do not need a subscription.

If you are dealing with a single scam or one bad actor, a one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal, and no trial. Or send us the link and our team captures the court-ready package for you, no installation required.

Guides for UK matters

Pick the forum you are dealing with

Each guide covers the deadlines that apply, what the decision maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.

Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own rules of evidence and their own defamation regimes, so treat the England and Wales detail on these pages as a starting point rather than the last word. Different country entirely? See ProofSnap in Canada, Australia or New Zealand, or Ireland, where eIDAS applies directly as EU law rather than through assimilated law.

Five questions a court in England and Wales asks about a screenshot

A screenshot is not rejected for being a screenshot. It loses because nobody can answer these five questions from the file itself. A ProofSnap package answers all five from the file, so the witness statement has something to exhibit rather than something to recall.

  1. When was it captured? A file date proves nothing, because a file date is trivially editable. A qualified eIDAS timestamp from Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, carries a rebuttable presumption of the accuracy of the date and time, and a Bitcoin anchor via OpenTimestamps corroborates it independently.
  2. Has it changed since? Every file in the package is hashed with SHA-256 and the manifest is signed with RSA-4096. Change one pixel and the hash no longer matches, which anyone can check offline with the verification scripts shipped in the package.
  3. Who captured it, and how? The chain of custody records the operator, the browser, the operating system, the resolved DNS, the TLS certificate and the HTTP response headers, in an ISO/IEC 27037 style log with its own tamper-evident hash chain.
  4. Was anything edited or left out? The forensic log discloses every layout change made during capture, including neutralised cookie banners and sticky headers, so nothing is silently removed. Section 4(2)(e) of that Act makes an edited account a factor going to weight.
  5. Can the other side check it without trusting us? Yes. The package verifies against public roots, the EU Trusted List and the Bitcoin blockchain, with no ProofSnap account and no ProofSnap server involved.

Official UK sources

The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than taking our word for it.

  • Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019: how the trust services chapter of eIDAS became UK assimilated law. Paragraph 20 of the Schedule inserted Article 24A with effect from 31 December 2020. The domestic implementing instrument is the Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions Regulations 2016 (SI 2016/696), under which the Information Commissioner is the supervisory body.
  • Retained Regulation (EU) 910/2014, Article 41: the presumption of the accuracy of the date and time and of the integrity of the data.
  • Retained Regulation (EU) 910/2014, Article 24A: recognition of EU standards, which lists Article 41(2) among the provisions for which an EU qualified service is treated as qualified in the UK.
  • Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, section 131: headed “Removal of recognition of EU standards etc”, the power to remove that recognition by regulations. The section is not yet in force (“S. 131 not in force at Royal Assent, see s. 142(1)”) and no regulations have been made under it. Parliament moved the other way in the meantime: sections 130 and 132 were commenced on 5 February 2026 by SI 2026/82, and section 130 inserted Article 24B, which recognises EU conformity assessment bodies.
  • ICO: guide to eIDAS: the UK supervisory position and the UK Trusted List, which the ICO has operated since October 2022.
  • Civil Evidence Act 1995: section 1(1) on hearsay, section 4 on weight, section 8 on proving statements in documents and section 9 on business records. By section 16(4) the Act extends to England and Wales only. Scotland is governed by the Civil Evidence (Scotland) Act 1988 and Northern Ireland by the Civil Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1997.
  • CPR Part 32: the evidence rules, including the notice to prove a document in rule 32.19.
  • Payment Systems Regulator: APP fraud reimbursement: the entitlement, the maximum and the claim deadline.
  • Practice Direction 57AD, disclosure in the Business and Property Courts: in force since 1 October 2022, replacing the Disclosure Pilot Scheme in PD 51U. It applies in the Business and Property Courts and expressly does not apply in the County Court. Paragraph 3.1 puts the preservation duty on a person who knows that they are or may become a party to proceedings that have been commenced, or who knows that they may become a party to proceedings that may be commenced, so the duty can bite well before anyone issues a claim form.
  • Financial Ombudsman Service: where a refused APP fraud reimbursement or a rejected section 75 claim goes next, decided on the written file.
  • BS 10008-1:2020, evidential weight and legal admissibility of electronically stored information: the British Standard specifying what makes electronically stored information trustworthy enough to rely on in a dispute, published 31 May 2020 and replacing the withdrawn 2008 and 2014 editions.

Don't trust us. Trust the maths.

Three vendor approaches. One critical difference.

Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.

ProofSnap Page Vault / Pagefreezer Notary / Wayback Machine
Verifiable without the vendor? Yes. SHA-256 and OpenTimestamps need no service of ours to verify No, verification requires their portal No, depends on archive availability
What if the vendor disappears? Evidence still valid Evidence becomes hard to defend Wayback can be wiped on request
Independent court-expert verification Any competent examiner, with the scripts in the package Requires vendor cooperation Requires manual screenshot
Cryptographic proof in the file itself Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) Proprietary format None
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
Spanish IP lawyer using ProofSnap
Verify a sample evidence package yourself

No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP

View the open-source verifier on GitHub

See ProofSnap in action

Watch how ProofSnap captures court-ready web evidence with blockchain timestamping in one click.

ProofSnap demo: a screenshot is not evidence, see what a signed capture contains
1:28

Learn how ProofSnap creates court-admissible digital evidence in one click

Click to watch on YouTube

What you get in one click

One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.

Visual Evidence

screenshot.jpeg

Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage

evidence.pdf

Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata

Complete Page Data

page.html

Complete HTML source code of the page

domtextcontent.txt

Extracted visible text content

metadata.json

URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate

Forensic Integrity

forensic_log.json

ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain

chain_of_custody.json

Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification

Cryptographic Proof

manifest.json

SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package

manifest.sig

RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest

publickey.pem

Public key for independent signature verification

Blockchain Timestamp

manifest.json.ots

OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain

Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Backdating it would be detectable. Independently verifiable by anyone.

Provenance Certificate

provenance_certificate.pdf

Anti-deepfake certificate with 6 integrity checks proving the evidence is an unaltered original

c2pa.json

C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA and Content Authenticity Initiative tools

As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest record how the capture was made and document eight integrity checks on it, covering AI generation and manipulation.

Video of Capture

capture_video.webm

Screen recording included in the evidence package, in three modes:

  • Auto: records the capture process (~60s), page scroll, screenshots, metadata extraction.
  • Manual: press Start before playing media on the page (live stream, infringer video, deepfake), then press Stop & Capture when you are done. Up to 5 min on Essential and Professional, 10 min on Enterprise and Company, and longer with a Video SnapPack credit.
  • Session: multi-tab. Records continuously while you browse across multiple tabs, then bundles a per-tab forensic package for every visited tab (full-page screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) into one signed ZIP.

All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, so any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.

SESSION CAPTURE

Multi-tab forensics in one ZIP

Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.

Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.

See exactly what a court receives

Download Sample Evidence Package

Open the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we'll capture it for you free of charge (URL must be publicly accessible, no login, paywall, or geo-block).

The presumption of accuracy of the date

A ProofSnap eIDAS qualified timestamp changes what the other side has to argue. Article 41(2) of Regulation (EU) 910/2014, as it has effect in UK assimilated law and extended to EU qualified services by Article 24A, gives the timestamp a rebuttable presumption of the accuracy of the date and time and of the integrity of the data, so the party disputing it has to displace that presumption.

With ProofSnap eIDAS timestamp

  • The other side must rebut the presumed date, time and integrity
  • Rebuttable presumption of accuracy (the eIDAS presumption in UK assimilated law, via Art. 24A)
  • Recognised across the UK
  • Verification runs offline from the package, without a bespoke expert report
  • Dual timestamp: eIDAS qualified + Bitcoin blockchain

Regular screenshot or blockchain-only

  • You must establish the date, time and integrity yourself
  • No legal presumption; the judge decides case by case
  • Court recognition varies by country
  • May need an expert witness to explain the blockchain
  • One deepfake objection can sink the whole exhibit

The other presumption, the one Horizon called into question

There is a second presumption in English law that matters more to digital evidence than most people realise, and it is currently under review. Since 2000, courts have worked from a common law rebuttable presumption that a computer was operating correctly at the material time, so the party relying on computer-generated material does not have to prove the system worked. The Post Office Horizon scandal is what that presumption looks like when it fails at scale.

On 21 January 2025 the Ministry of Justice opened a call for evidence on the use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings, asking whether the presumption remains appropriate, how computer evidence should be defined, and whether legislation is needed. The British Computer Society welcomed the review. The call for evidence closed on 15 April 2025 and, as at August 2026, no government response has been published. Whatever replaces the presumption, the direction of travel is clear: courts will want to see why a piece of computer output should be believed, rather than simply assuming that it should be.

That is an argument for evidence built the way ours is, not against it. A ProofSnap package does not ask a court to presume anything about the machine that made it. The hashes can be recomputed, the signature checks out against a public key that travels with the package, the OpenTimestamps proof anchors to the Bitcoin blockchain and the qualified timestamp verifies against the EU Trusted List. The other side's expert can run every one of those checks on their own hardware, years later, without relying on any presumption.

eIDAS qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Flexible plans for every stage

Choose your plan and activate it directly in the app.

→ Save up to 26%

Essential (Annual)

$8.99approx. £7

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 100

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 5/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • White-label branding on evidence PDFs
  • Court-Ready Qualified Timestamp (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

Regular use, archiving

Most Popular

Professional (Annual)

$16.99approx. £13

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 200

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: 15/mo
  • White-label branding on evidence PDFs
  • Court-Ready Qualified Timestamp (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation

Premium

Enterprise (Annual)

$28.99approx. £22

per month

Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 50/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • White-label branding on evidence PDFs
  • Court-Ready Qualified Timestamp: 10/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows

Company Plans

Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.

Best Value

Annual

$190approx. £142
/licence/year

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within one working day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • White-label branding on evidence PDFs
  • Court-Ready Qualified Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises

Monthly

$18.99approx. £14
/licence/month

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within one working day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • White-label branding on evidence PDFs
  • Court-Ready Qualified Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

Flexible monthly billing for teams

No subscription? Pay-as-you-go SnapPacks.

One-off purchase, no auto-renewal. Credits valid for 12 months (Standard SnapPack never expires).

Standard SnapPack

10 captures · no expiry

$4.99approx. £3.75

All features: export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.

eIDAS SnapPack

EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)

$24.99 / 5 stampsapprox. £19

$5.00 / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 (about £5.25) or 10× $49.99 (about £37)

Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS). Includes white-label branding on evidence PDF.

Video SnapPack

75-min recording with audio + bundled credits

$59.99 / 3 videosapprox. £45

$20.00 (about £15) / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 (about £19) or 10× $169.99 (about £127)

Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. White-label branding included.

Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →

Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.

Start Free 7-Day Trial
4.8/5 from 5 reviews on the Chrome Web Store, August 2026

Brexit did not take eIDAS away

This is the part most people get backwards, so it is worth being precise. The United Kingdom retained the trust services chapter of eIDAS in domestic law, and Article 24A of that assimilated Regulation treats a service qualified under EU law as qualified here. The recognition is asymmetrical, and it runs in your favour.

Article 41(2) applies here

Article 41(2) as it has effect in UK law reads: “A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.” It was carried across into UK law with the rest of the trust services chapter. The presumption is rebuttable.

EU providers are recognised in the UK (Article 24A)

Article 24A of the assimilated Regulation provides that, for the purposes of Article 41(2) among others, anything not qualified under the UK Regulation is to be treated as qualified if “it is qualified under the equivalent EU law”. So an EU qualified timestamp works here. The reverse is not true: UK providers lost qualified status in the EU. Our timestamps come from Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List.

CPR 32.19 decides who has to prove what

CPR 32.19(1): “A party shall be deemed to admit the authenticity of a document disclosed to him under Part 31 unless he serves notice that he wishes the document to be proved at trial.” By 32.19(2) that notice is due by the latest date for serving witness statements or within 7 days of disclosure, whichever is later. A record that is obviously verifiable is a record nobody bothers to challenge. These are the rules of England and Wales.

Civil Evidence Act 1995 (England and Wales)

Section 8(1) lets a statement in a document be proved by producing the document or a copy “authenticated in such manner as the court may approve”, and section 9(1) lets a document forming part of the records of a business or public authority be received “without further proof”, with section 9(4) defining records as records in whatever form. Section 16(4) limits the Act to England and Wales.

Section 4 is where a ProofSnap package earns its weight

Section 4(1) says that in estimating the weight of hearsay evidence “the court shall have regard to any circumstances from which any inference can reasonably be drawn as to the reliability or otherwise of the evidence”, and section 4(2) then lists six factors. Three of them are exactly what a signed capture answers on the face of the file: whether the statement was made contemporaneously with the matters stated, whether anyone involved had a motive to conceal or misrepresent, and whether the account was edited. A ProofSnap package carries a qualified timestamp for the first, a chain of custody for the second and a SHA-256 hash over every file for the third.

What the presumption does and does not do: it goes to the accuracy of the time and the integrity of the data, not to admissibility in the round. A court still applies the CPR and the Civil Evidence Act, and still weighs the evidence. What the timestamp removes is the argument about when the capture was made and whether it changed afterwards, which in practice is the argument you would otherwise be having. It does not authenticate the exhibit, prove what the page said, prove the capture was complete or identify who made it, so a witness statement under CPR Part 32 is still required. Filling that gap is the job of the rest of the package: the screenshot, the HTML, the DOM text, the chain of custody and the forensic log. This reflects the position as at 5 September 2026. The recognition is real but revocable in principle, and the sources below set out the instrument that would do it. Parliament has so far moved the other way, with section 130 inserting Article 24B to recognise EU conformity assessment bodies. England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are separate jurisdictions with separate procedural rules, and the CPR references on this page are the rules of England and Wales.

Prices are charged in USD. The approximate sterling figure shown under each price is for orientation only, converted at roughly £0.75 to the US dollar. Your card issuer sets the actual rate on the day. The 7-day trial requires a credit card. Prefer not to subscribe? A one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal and no trial.

Done-for-You Service

Not the DIY type? We capture it for you.

For one-off legal disputes, single fraud reports, or anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall, or geo-block) and we deliver a 15-file court-ready package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), video and audio recording, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor, all included. Not sure what will hold up? Just tell us your situation and we’ll assemble the evidence package for your case.

Web capture · you send a URL

Single Capture

1 URL · delivered in 24 hours

$44.99approx. £34
  • Video + audio recording
  • Multi-tab session
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp
  • Bitcoin blockchain anchor
  • 15-file ZIP + PDF court bundle
Order Single $44.99 (about £34)
Best value

Evidence Pack

Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 24 hours

$149 · $29.80 (about £22) / URLapprox. £112
  • All features from Single, ×5
  • Unified chain of custody
  • Takedown bundles & fraud chains
  • Single ZIP + per-URL PDFs
  • 33% bundle discount against five Single captures
Order Evidence Pack $149 (about £112)

File certification · you send the files

Already have the evidence as files? We hash, sign and timestamp chat exports, recordings and documents exactly as they are. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.

File Certification

1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours

$59.99approx. £45
  • Files you already have (chat export, document, audio, video)
  • One evidence item can be several related files
  • Readable transcript rendered (chat exports)
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp + Bitcoin anchor
  • Signed ZIP + certificate PDF
Order File Certification · $59.99

Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List.

Need more information or have a detailed URL list to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.

See full comparison & FAQ →

Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works in your jurisdiction on WhatsApp evidence by country, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.

Who uses ProofSnap and why

Lawyers, Auditors & Compliance

Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance

  • Timestamped snapshots for dispute resolution
  • Audit-ready exports for regulatory filings
  • Built to the evidential-weight question BS 10008 addresses
  • Preserve a third-party web page once litigation is on the cards, as PD 57AD requires in the Business and Property Courts
  • Cryptographic hash for integrity
  • Contract and employment disputes
Samantha Blake, Legal Counsel
“Screenshots aren't enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need.”
Legal Professional

Journalists & Digital Investigators

Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research

  • Capture controversial posts or deleted pages
  • Export as PDF or ZIP for transparency
  • Embed source URL, timestamp, browser context
  • Digital forensics, website changes, online harassment
Oliver Hart, Journalist and Activist
“ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it's edited, censored, or erased.”
Investigative Journalist

HR Managers, Recruiters, Visa Officers, Talent Ops

Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records

  • LinkedIn profile snapshots for candidate verification, post validation, and prevention of profile falsification
  • Timestamped proof for employment validation and visa processing
  • Archive candidate documents for compliance and audit
  • Save snapshots of onboarding portals and signed contracts
  • HR archiving, onboarding version control, and data integrity
Alina, Talent Acquisition
“It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews.”
HR Director

Anyone Who Needs Trusted Snapshots

Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later

  • Save pricing pages, policies, receipts
  • Archive agreements or service terms
  • Use for personal records or disputes
  • Online casino bonus terms, payout disputes, gambling chargebacks
  • Exportable, portable, legally meaningful
Scott Johnson, User
“I don't just save what I see, I save what it means.”
OSINT Researcher

Resources and insights

Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.

NEW 2026 Deepfake Defence

How Evidence Survives a Deepfake Objection

Provenance certificate with 8 integrity checks, and what a court asks once authenticity is disputed.

8 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Evidence Authentication

How to Authenticate Web Evidence That Survives Cross‑Examination

A bare screenshot proves nothing about its own origin. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, an ISO 27037 chain of custody and open-source verification do. Case law and what a court checks.

7 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Divorce & Custody

Divorce & Custody: How to Capture Social Media Evidence for Court

81% of divorce lawyers reported a surge in social networking evidence (AAML survey, 2010). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, dating apps before they disappear. Family court and financial remedy proceedings. CPR 32, eIDAS Article 41.

14 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying Evidence: How to Document It for Police & Court

46% of US teens have experienced at least one cyberbullying behaviour (Pew Research Center, 2022). Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, EU laws.

12 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Brand Protection

Brand Protection for E-Commerce: Amazon, Temu & Global Marketplaces

$467bn in counterfeit trade. Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. US Lanham Act, EU DSA, eIDAS 2. Case law & evidence playbook.

35 min read Read article
NEW 2026 OSINT

OSINT 101: Preserve Social Media Evidence Before It’s Deleted

X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. Authentication, blockchain timestamps, GDPR, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQ. OSINT guide.

40 min read Read article

Frequently asked questions

Contact us

Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.

Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com