September 2025: A California court threw out Mendones v. Cushman & Wakefield because the video evidence was AI-generated. Is your evidence tamper-proof?

Screenshots get thrown out of Cyprus courts.
ProofSnap doesn't.

The only web evidence tool whose proofs survive even if our company disappears. Self-verifiable cryptography, no vendor lock-in, no “trust us” required.

Tamper-evident cryptographic evidence a court can test for itself: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, video of the capture, Provenance Certificate. One click. 41 seconds. Building a CySEC complaint against a Cyprus Investment Firm? Capture the terms page, the balance and the chat before your broker closes the account.

From $8.99/month (approx. €7.80) · Up to 15 files per package · 23 countries

ProofSnap Chrome extension side panel, capture page snapshot, record video, EU qualified timestamp (eIDAS), and Trust Verifier

Start without installing anything

No account, nothing to set up.

No signup

See exactly what a Cyprus court receives

Download a real evidence package. Open the PDF, read the chain of custody, then drop the whole ZIP into the Trust Verifier and watch it check the hashes, the signature and the timestamps in front of you.

Download the sample package

9.4 MB ZIP. No account, no email address, nothing to install.

Or we do it for you

You send a link or the files. We send back a signed, timestamped package that a Cyprus court can check, within 24 hours.

A chat export is the file the app gives you when you tap Export chat. We render it as a readable transcript, hash every file and timestamp the result, so an allegation that the messages were edited has to contend with the hashes.

Screenshots are seldom ruled inadmissible in Cyprus; they are just easy to challenge, and that is how cases are lost. ProofSnap captures a web page as court-ready evidence in 41 seconds: Cyprus is an EU member state, so under eIDAS Article 41(2) a qualified electronic time stamp is presumed accurate as to the date and time it indicates.

Cyprus gives you both halves of the problem in one jurisdiction. It is an EU member state, so eIDAS applies here directly, as EU law. Under Article 41(2) a qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound, and because that provision is directly applicable in every member state, a qualified time stamp from any EU qualified trust service provider on the EU Trusted List triggers the same presumption before a Cyprus court. The Department of Electronic Communications, at the Deputy Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digital Policy, is the supervisory body for trust services here and keeps the national trusted list.

The other half is procedure, and it is English. The Civil Procedure Rules 2023, which apply to actions filed from 1 September 2023, are modelled on the English CPR: Part 31 governs disclosure, Part 32 governs evidence, and there is a simplified track under Part 29 where the amount in dispute is less than €10,000. Underneath them sits the Evidence Law, Cap. 9, which follows the English law of evidence as it stood on 5 November 1914. So a Cyprus judge asks the questions an English judge asks about a document, and the answer you can give is the one an EU-law presumption supplies. That combination is rare, and it is the reason a hashed, signed, qualified-timestamped package is worth more here than a folder of screenshots.

ProofSnap is a Chrome & Edge extension that captures web pages as court-admissible evidence in 41 seconds. Three capture options: single page, multi-tab browsing session (with per-tab forensic packages), or signed video proof (Auto, Manual, or Session-wide screen recording). Every capture includes a SHA-256 cryptographic hash, RSA-4096 digital signature, Bitcoin blockchain timestamp via OpenTimestamps, and a Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks for deepfake detection. Our eIDAS qualified timestamps, available on Enterprise and Company plans or through an eIDAS SnapPack, are issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List.

Most Cyprus disputes never reach a full trial. A client of a Cyprus Investment Firm complains to the firm first and then to the Financial Ombudsman, an employee has twelve months to go to the Industrial Disputes Tribunal, a defamation claim runs on a one-year limitation, and a claim worth less than €10,000 takes the simplified Part 29 track. Every one of them is decided on documents filed in advance. The same signed package works for a complaint against a regulated firm, for a chat thread you need to exhibit to a witness statement, and for an advocate's evidence file. Pricing starts at $8.99/month (approx. €7.80) with a 7-day free trial that requires a credit card. Used by advocates and law firms, short-term rental hosts, copyright enforcement firms and compliance teams in 23 countries.

· · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier

41s
Per capture
11-15
Files per evidence package
27
EU states, legal recognition
7 days
7-day trial, credit card required

Trusted by professionals at

State Attorney General's Office · Süddeutsche Zeitung · Coty Inc · Hogan Lovells

Powered by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Why courts reject screenshots

United States courts rejected screenshot evidence in US v. Vayner, Griffin v. State and Serrano v. Cruz-Angeles. The same authentication gap arises in Cyprus.

No timestamp proof

File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.

No tampering detection

Any screenshot can be edited in 10 seconds with AI. On 9 September 2025 the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, dismissed Mendones v. Cushman & Wakefield with prejudice as a terminating sanction, after finding that video exhibits had been generated with AI. Without a SHA-256 hash, there is no way to prove yours is real.

No chain of custody

Who captured it? When? On what device? How was it stored? Screenshots don't answer any of these questions. Under the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 the other side can put a document in issue, and then a bare screenshot has to be proved.

Your screenshot

  • 1 JPEG file, no proof it's real
  • No timestamp, could have been taken at any time
  • Editable in Photoshop in 10 seconds
  • Judge: “Anyone could have made this.”

ProofSnap evidence package

  • Up to 15 files, screenshot, HTML, metadata, forensic log
  • Blockchain timestamp, immutable proof of when it was captured
  • Video of capture + Provenance Certificate
  • Chain of custody, court-ready in Cyprus and across the EU

Built for how disputes start in Cyprus

Capture it before they delete it

Cyprus runs an English-style procedure inside the European Union, and it hosts an unusually large financial services sector for its size. That combination shapes the disputes: they are about what a trading platform, a terms page or a message showed on a particular day, and they are decided on documents disclosed long before anyone gives oral evidence. ProofSnap seals that record in seconds, with a signed PDF, a SHA-256 hash and an eIDAS qualified timestamp that holds up when the other side says "that screenshot is fake".

Forex and CFD disputes: the platform is the evidence

Cyprus licenses a large share of Europe's retail brokers, and a complaint against a Cyprus Investment Firm is decided on what the platform and the terms showed on the day. The ladder is fixed. Complain to the firm first: it must acknowledge your complaint in writing within five days and reply within two months, saying either that the complaint is resolved or why it needs longer, with three months from the complaint as the outer limit. If that answer does not satisfy you, take it to the Financial Ombudsman for a €20 fee. Watch the Ombudsman's own clocks: the written complaint must reach the firm within six months of the moment you knew or should have known about the act, and the complaint must reach the Ombudsman within twelve months of that complaint to the firm, or eighteen months of when you became aware. Terms pages, spreads, margin-call notices and chat transcripts are edited or lost when an account is closed, so capture the terms page, the balance and the chat transcript on the day the dispute starts. If the firm fails and is a member, the Investor Compensation Fund covers non-professional clients up to the lower of 90% of the covered claim and €20,000, and that claim needs the same records.

Unlawful dismissal: twelve months, and the record goes first

An unlawful dismissal claim, which is what UK readers would call unfair dismissal, is brought before the Industrial Disputes Tribunal, generally within twelve months of the dismissal, and an employee needs at least 26 weeks of continuous employment with the same employer to claim compensation under the Termination of Employment Law of 1967. The tribunal can award up to two years' wages, and not less than the redundancy payment the employee would have received had the job ended by redundancy. Twelve months sounds generous until you realise that the roster, the internal messages, the HR portal entry and the manager's post all live behind a company login that closes on your last day. Capture them then, not when you finally instruct an advocate.

Defamation: how to save a defamatory post before it is deleted

Defamation in Cyprus is a civil wrong under the Civil Wrongs Law, Cap. 148. Libel, which covers anything published in permanent form, including a post, a review or a message, is actionable per se, so you do not have to prove financial loss. The limitation period is one year under the Limitation of Actions Law 66(I)/2012. Where the poster is anonymous you first need a disclosure order against the platform or provider to identify them, and that takes weeks the post may not survive. Preserve the record, including the post, the profile, the comment thread and the visible reach, before you apply for a disclosure order, because all four are gone the moment the account is deleted. The same applies to a fake review damaging a Cyprus business: capture the review page before the reviewer edits it.

Disclosure under the CPR 2023: authenticity comes first

For actions filed from 1 September 2023 the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 apply, modelled on the English CPR, with Part 31 on disclosure and Part 32 on evidence. In that system the first argument about a screenshot is not whether it is relevant but whether it is genuine, and the party relying on the document is the one who has to prove it when the other side puts it in issue. A package with SHA-256 hashes, an RSA-4096 signed manifest, a chain of custody and a verification script answers that from the file rather than from a witness.

Small claims: the simplified track up to €10,000

Part 29 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023 sets a simplified procedure where the amount in dispute is less than €10,000, with lighter rules for disclosure, evidence and the hearing itself. That is where most consumer and small-business disputes end up: an online order that never arrived, a service that was not delivered, a deposit that was not returned. These cases are decided quickly and on paper, which rewards the party who can show the listing, the confirmation and the chat exactly as they read at the time, and punishes the one who describes them from memory.

Scams and phishing: capture before the site disappears

Cyprus has no automatic reimbursement scheme for a transfer you were tricked into making, so a disputed payment goes to the provider, then to the Financial Ombudsman, who can look at complaints of up to €250,000 from consumers and micro-enterprises, and then to court. Every one of those steps asks the same thing: what did the page and the message actually say? Fake bank pages, investment dashboards and courier notifications are taken down within days of being reported, so capture the site, the message and the payment screen while they are still live, then report to the police.

How to prove constructive dismissal in Cyprus

If you resign because of the employer's conduct, section 7 of the Termination of Employment Law of 1967 treats that as a termination by the employer, so the claim goes to the same Industrial Disputes Tribunal on the same twelve-month clock. The catch is subsection 7(2): the tribunal presumes that the employee did not terminate the employment lawfully until the employee proves otherwise. That reversed burden is won or lost on the paper trail: the messages, the rota changes, the demotion email, the withheld pay. Every one of those items sits inside a company account that closes on your last day.

Property and deposits: the brochure claim disappears with the website

Off-plan purchases, unreturned deposits and unfinished works are a large share of Cyprus civil litigation, and much of the argument is about what the listing, the floor plan and the developer's email promised before the site was quietly updated. Your registered position depends on paperwork too: under the Sale of Immovable Property (Specific Performance) Law 81(I)/2011 a stamped copy of the contract of sale deposited with the Land Registry within six months of signing secures priority against the vendor and later encumbrances. Miss it and you are not automatically out of options: since the 2017 amendment a buyer can ask the court for leave to deposit late where that is fair and reasonable. Capture the listing, the brochure claim and the developer's email before the website changes.

Just one dispute? You do not need a subscription.

If you are dealing with a single scam or one bad actor, a one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal, and no trial. Or send us the link and our team captures the court-ready package for you, no install required.

Putting a web capture before a Cyprus court under the CPR 2023

The Civil Procedure Rules 2023 changed how a Cyprus action is built. Cases filed from 1 September 2023 run on a framework modelled on the English CPR, with disclosure under Part 31, evidence under Part 32, witness statements instead of open-ended oral evidence, and active case management by the court. For a captured web page that means the fight happens early, on paper, and it is about authenticity before it is about anything else.

  1. Capture before the claim exists. A capture made while the page was live and before the dispute crystallised is worth more than one assembled for the litigation, and it is the only version the other side cannot say you curated.
  2. Disclose the package, not the picture. Give the screenshot, the page source, the SHA-256 hashes, the signed manifest, the public key and the chain of custody, so what you disclose is a process rather than an image.
  3. Describe it in the witness statement. Say what the package contains, when the capture ran and what the timestamp covers. Under Article 41(2) of eIDAS the date, the time and the integrity of the bound data are presumed, so the statement does not have to carry that weight alone.
  4. Let the court check it without an expert. The verification scripts and the Trust Verifier recompute the hashes and the signature in front of whoever is asking, which is usually cheaper and faster than the court appointing an expert to do the same job.

The Evidence Law, Cap. 9 sits underneath all of this and follows the English law of evidence as it stood on 5 November 1914, which is why Cyprus practice on documents feels familiar to an English lawyer and unfamiliar to a continental one. This describes what the package contains, not what you should do in your own matter. Take that to a Cyprus advocate.

Guides for Cyprus matters

Pick the forum you are dealing with

Each guide covers what the decision-maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.

"A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound."

Article 41(2), Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, quoted verbatim from EUR-Lex. Cyprus is an EU member state, so the provision applies directly and needs no transposing statute. The Department of Electronic Communications supervises trust services in Cyprus and maintains the national trusted list, and a qualified time stamp from any provider on the EU Trusted List carries the same presumption here.

Four steps to preserve web evidence for a Cyprus forum

The order matters, because a Cyprus action is now built on documents disclosed early, and because the regulated firms and platforms in these disputes edit terms pages and close accounts quickly.

  1. Capture before you complain. A complaint to the firm, a report to the platform or a police report starts the clock on the material disappearing. Capture the site, the message and the payment screen while they are still live, then report.
  2. Keep the package, not the picture. A screenshot is a picture of a claim. A ProofSnap package is the screenshot plus the page source, the DOM text, the SHA-256 hashes, the RSA-4096 signed manifest, the public key, the chain of custody and the verification scripts, 11 to 15 files depending on your plan.
  3. Add the qualified timestamp where the date is contested. Article 41(2) applies directly in Cyprus, so a qualified electronic time stamp carries the presumption of the accuracy of its date and time and of the integrity of the data bound to it, and the other side has to displace that with evidence rather than with assertion.
  4. Disclose it in the form the forum uses. In court that means disclosure under Part 31 and a witness statement that describes the package. Before the Financial Ombudsman, the Industrial Disputes Tribunal or on the simplified track it means the written file. Attach the signed PDF and the ZIP, and give the decision-maker the Trust Verifier link so they can check it themselves.

This describes what the package contains, not what you should do in your own matter. Take that to a Cyprus advocate.

This page covers the Republic of Cyprus. For other English-speaking EU and common law jurisdictions, see Malta, Ireland or the United Kingdom.

Official Cyprus sources

The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than take our word for it.

Don't trust us. Trust the maths.

Three vendor approaches. One critical difference.

Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.

ProofSnap Page Vault / Pagefreezer Notary / Wayback Machine
Verifiable without the vendor? Yes, SHA-256 + OpenTimestamps work forever No, verification requires their portal No, depends on archive availability
What if the vendor disappears? Evidence still valid Evidence becomes hard to defend Wayback can be wiped on request
Independent court-expert verification Any IT expert, in 60 seconds Requires vendor cooperation Requires manual screenshot
Cryptographic proof in the file itself Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) Proprietary format None
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
Spanish IP lawyer using ProofSnap
Verify a sample evidence package yourself

No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP

View the open-source verifier on GitHub

See ProofSnap in Action

Watch how ProofSnap captures legally admissible web evidence with blockchain timestamping in just 41 seconds.

ProofSnap demo: a screenshot is not evidence, see what a signed capture contains
1:28

Learn how ProofSnap creates court-admissible digital evidence in 41 seconds

Click to watch on YouTube

What you get in 41 seconds

One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.

Visual Evidence

screenshot.jpeg

Full-page scrolling capture of the entire web page

evidence.pdf

Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata

Complete Page Data

page.html

Complete HTML source code of the page

domtextcontent.txt

Extracted visible text content

metadata.json

URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate

Forensic Integrity

forensic_log.json

ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain

chain_of_custody.json

Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification

Cryptographic Proof

manifest.json

SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package

manifest.sig

RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest

publickey.pem

Public key for independent signature verification

Blockchain Timestamp

manifest.json.ots

OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain

Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Cannot be forged or backdated. Independently verifiable by anyone.

Provenance Certificate

provenance_certificate.pdf

Anti-deepfake certificate with 8 integrity checks proving the evidence is an unaltered original

c2pa.json

C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA / Content Authenticity Initiative tools and aligned with EU AI Act Art. 50

As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest prove your capture is authentic, not AI-generated or manipulated. Required under EU AI Act Art. 50 (Aug 2026).

Video of Capture

capture_video.webm

Screen recording included in the evidence package, three modes:

  • Auto: records the capture process (~60s), page scroll, screenshots, metadata extraction.
  • Manual: press Start before playing media on the page (live stream, infringer video, deepfake), Stop & Capture when done. Up to 5 min on Essential / Pro, 10 min on Enterprise / Company.
  • Session: multi-tab. Records continuously while you browse across multiple tabs, then bundles a per-tab forensic package for every visited tab (full-page screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) into one signed ZIP.

All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, so any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.

SESSION CAPTURE

Multi-tab forensics in one ZIP

Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.

Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.

See exactly what a court receives

Download Sample Evidence Package

Open the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we'll capture it for you free of charge (the URL must be publicly accessible, with no login, paywall or geo-block).

The burden of proof, reversed under eIDAS Article 41

ProofSnap's eIDAS qualified timestamps shift the legal burden. Cyprus is an EU member state, so Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 applies directly. Under Article 41(2) the timestamp on your capture is presumed accurate as to the date and time it indicates, and the data bound to it is presumed intact, so it is the opposing party who must produce evidence to displace that.

Article 41(1): "An electronic time stamp shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic time stamp."

Article 41(2): "A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound."

Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Article 41, paragraphs 1 and 2. Quoted verbatim from EUR-Lex. Because Cyprus is an EU member state, the presumption in Article 41(2) arises before a Cyprus court or tribunal without any further step.

With ProofSnap eIDAS timestamp

  • Opponent must prove your evidence is fake
  • Legal presumption of accuracy (eIDAS Art. 41)
  • Automatically recognised in all 27 EU member states
  • No expert witness needed to explain the technology
  • Dual timestamp: eIDAS qualified + Bitcoin blockchain

Regular screenshot or blockchain-only

  • You must prove your evidence is real
  • No legal presumption, judge decides case by case
  • Court recognition varies by country
  • May need expert witness to explain blockchain
  • A deepfake objection can sink the whole exhibit

eIDAS qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Flexible Plans for Every Stage

Choose your plan and activate it directly in the app.

→ Save up to 25%

Essential (Annual)

$8.99approx. €7.80

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 100

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 5/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

Regular use, archiving

Most Popular

Professional (Annual)

$16.99approx. €14.80

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 200

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: 15/mo
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation

Premium

Enterprise (Annual)

$28.99approx. €25.20

per month

Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 50/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 10/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows

Company Plans

Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.

Best Value

Annual

$190approx. €165
/licence/year

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within 1 business day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises

Monthly

$18.99approx. €16.50
/licence/month

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day free trial included
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within 1 business day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)
  • Forensic mode (WARC + HAR + resources + TLS)

1 stamp during trial

Flexible monthly billing for teams

No subscription? Pay-as-you-go SnapPacks.

One-off purchase, no auto-renewal. eIDAS and Video SnapPack credits are valid for 12 months. Standard SnapPack credits never expire.

Standard SnapPack

10 captures · no expiry

$4.99approx. €4.35

All features: export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.

eIDAS SnapPack

EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)

$24.99 / 5 stampsapprox. €21.70

$5.00 (approx. €4.35) / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 (approx. €6.10) or 10× $49.99 (approx. €43.50)

Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS Art. 41). Includes whitelabel branding on evidence PDF.

Video SnapPack

30-min recording with audio + bundled credits

$59.99 / 3 videosapprox. €52

$19.99 (approx. €17.40) / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 (approx. €21.70) or 10× $169.99 (approx. €148)

Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. Whitelabel branding included.

Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →

Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.

Start Free 7-Day Trial
4.8/5 on Chrome Web Store

EU law, applied directly, no recognition argument

Cyprus is a useful hybrid. As an EU member state it applies eIDAS directly, so there is no question of whether the Regulation was carried across into domestic law and no asymmetric recognition to explain. As a jurisdiction whose procedure and evidence law follow England, it asks the familiar common law questions about a document. The Department of Electronic Communications supervises trust services here and keeps the national trusted list.

Article 41 applies as EU law

A qualified electronic time stamp enjoys the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound. That provision is directly applicable in every member state, so a timestamp issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, carries the same effect before a Cyprus court as it does anywhere else in the Union.

Civil Procedure Rules 2023

Actions filed from 1 September 2023 run on rules modelled on the English CPR, with disclosure under Part 31 and evidence under Part 32. The first contest over a captured page is about authenticity, and it is the party relying on the document who has to prove it once the other side puts it in issue.

English evidence law, frozen in 1914

The Evidence Law, Cap. 9 applies the English law of evidence as it stood on 5 November 1914, updated by later Cyprus statutes. That is why Cyprus practice on documents reads as common law rather than continental, and why a process that a court can test itself counts for more here than a sworn description of a page.

Deadlines, and one that is easy to miss

Twelve months to bring an unlawful dismissal claim before the Industrial Disputes Tribunal. One year for defamation under the Limitation of Actions Law. Six months to put your complaint to a financial institution in writing, and then twelve months from that complaint, or eighteen from when you became aware, to reach the Financial Ombudsman. None of them waits while you look for a copy of a deleted page.

What the presumption does and does not do: it goes to the accuracy of the time and the integrity of the data, not to admissibility in the round or to the truth of what the page said. A Cyprus court still weighs the evidence. What the timestamp removes is the argument about when the capture was made and whether it changed afterwards, which in practice is the argument you would otherwise be having.

Prices are charged in USD. The approximate euro figure shown under each price is for orientation only, converted at about €0.87 to US$1. Your card issuer sets the actual rate on the day. The 7-day trial requires a credit card. Prefer not to subscribe? A one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal and no trial.

Evidence capture service

Not the DIY type? We capture it for you.

For one-off legal disputes and single fraud reports, or for anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall, or geo-block). We deliver the full 15-file court-ready package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), video and audio recording of the capture, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor. Not sure which capture you need? Tell us what you want preserved and we will tell you which package covers it.

Web capture · you send a URL

Single Capture

1 URL · delivered in 24 hours

$44.99approx. €39
  • Video + audio recording
  • Multi-tab session
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp
  • Bitcoin blockchain anchor
  • 15-file ZIP + PDF court bundle
Order Single $44.99 (approx. €39)
Best value

Evidence Pack

Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 24 hours

$149 · $29.80 (approx. €26) / URLapprox. €130
  • All features from Single, ×5
  • Unified chain of custody
  • Takedown bundles & fraud chains
  • Single ZIP + per-URL PDFs
  • 33% bundle discount vs. ×5 Single
Order Evidence Pack $149 (approx. €130)

File certification · you send the files

Already have the evidence as files? We hash, sign and timestamp chat exports, recordings and documents as they are. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.

File Certification

1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours

$59.99approx. €52
  • Files you already have (chat export, document, audio, video)
  • One evidence item can be several related files
  • Readable transcript rendered (chat exports)
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp + Bitcoin anchor
  • Signed ZIP + certificate PDF
Order File Certification · $59.99 (approx. €52)

Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) 910/2014.

Need more info, or have a detailed URL list to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.

See full comparison & FAQ →

Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works in your jurisdiction on WhatsApp evidence by country, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.

Who Uses ProofSnap and Why

Legal professionals icon

Advocates, auditors and compliance teams

Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance

  • Timestamped snapshots for dispute resolution
  • Audit-ready exports for regulatory filings
  • Cryptographic hash for integrity
  • Contract and employment disputes
Legal professional testimonial for ProofSnap
"Screenshots aren't enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need."
Legal Professional
Journalist icon

Journalists & Digital Investigators

Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research

  • Capture controversial posts or deleted pages
  • Export as PDF or ZIP for transparency
  • Embed source URL, timestamp, browser context
  • Digital forensics, website changes, online harassment
Journalist testimonial for ProofSnap
"ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it's edited, censored, or erased."
Investigative Journalist
HR professionals icon

HR Managers, Recruiters, Visa Officers, Talent Ops

Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records

  • LinkedIn profile snapshots for candidate verification, post validation, and prevention of profile falsification
  • Timestamped proof for employment validation and visa processing
  • Archive candidate documents for compliance and audit
  • Save snapshots of onboarding portals and signed contracts
  • HR archiving, onboarding version control, and data integrity
HR professional testimonial for ProofSnap evidence capture
"It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews."
HR Director
Anyone icon

Anyone Who Needs Trusted Snapshots

Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later

  • Save pricing pages, policies, receipts
  • Archive agreements or service terms
  • Use for personal records or disputes
  • Online casino bonus terms, payout disputes, gambling chargebacks
  • Exportable, portable, legally meaningful
Individual user testimonial for ProofSnap web evidence tool
"I don't just save what I see, I save what it means."
OSINT Researcher

Resources & Insights

Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.

NEW 2026 Deepfake Defence

How Evidence Survives Deepfake Objections Under FRE 707

Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks. Case law: Mendones v. Cushman (2025). FRE 707, Louisiana Act 250, EU AI Act Art. 50.

8 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Evidence Authentication

How to Authenticate Web Evidence That Survives Cross-Examination

Screenshots fail under FRE 901. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, ISO 27037 chain of custody, and open-source verification survive. Case law, Page Vault comparison.

7 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Divorce & Custody

Divorce & Custody: How to Capture Social Media Evidence for Court

81% of divorce lawyers report a surge in social media evidence (AAML). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and dating apps before they disappear. Family and financial proceedings. eIDAS Article 41.

14 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying Evidence: How to Document It for Police & Court

46% of teens cyberbullied. Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. Cyprus, EU, UK and US law.

12 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Brand Protection

Brand Protection for E-Commerce: Amazon, Temu & Global Marketplaces

$467B counterfeit trade. Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. US Lanham Act, EU DSA, eIDAS 2, FRE 901. Case law & evidence playbook.

35 min read Read article
NEW 2026 OSINT

OSINT 101: Preserve Social Media Evidence Before It’s Deleted

X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. FRE 901 authentication, blockchain timestamps, GDPR, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQs. OSINT guide.

40 min read Read article

Frequently Asked Questions

Contact Us

Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.

Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com

Start your 7-day free trial