Sept 2025: A California judge threw out a case because the video evidence was a deepfake. Is your evidence tamper-proof?
For India · Section 63 BSA, the certificate wants a hash

The certificate asks for a hash value.
So produce one.

The only web evidence tool whose proofs survive even if our company disappears. Self-verifiable cryptography, no vendor lock-in, no “trust us” required.

Tamper-proof cryptographic evidence courts accept: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, capture video, Provenance Certificate. One click. 41 seconds.

From $8.99/mo (about ₹860) · Up to 15 files per package · 23 countries

ProofSnap Chrome extension side panel, capture page snapshot, record video, EU qualified timestamp (eIDAS), and Trust Verifier

In India, section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 has required since 1 July 2024 that a certificate accompanying an electronic record state the hash value of that record. ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures any web page in about 41 seconds and produces exactly that hash, signed and timestamped.

Indian evidence law names the exact artefact a forensic capture produces. Since 1 July 2024, section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 has replaced section 65B of the Evidence Act. An electronic record is admissible without producing the original device, but only with a certificate, and that certificate must now be signed in two parts, by the person in lawful control of the device and by an expert, and under section 63(4)(c) it must state the hash value of the record. Courts have described that hash as an electronic fingerprint that lets them test whether a file has been altered. A 2026 study by Dr Arti Singh in the International Innovations and Scholarly Trends Journal (IISTJ), covering 82 trial court orders from Delhi and Mumbai between July 2024 and August 2026, found that certificate-related rejections of electronic evidence fell from 67 per cent to 3.6 per cent after the change, but that overall rejection still ran at 37.8 per cent, and that 61.3 per cent of those rejections were for non-production of the hash value. That is the whole argument on this page: a phone screenshot has no hash worth certifying, and a captured package has one generated at the moment of capture.

ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures a web page, a chat or a dashboard in about 41 seconds and returns a package containing the full page, the saved source, the URL, the capture time in UTC, an SHA-256 hash of every file, an RSA-4096 signature and a Bitcoin blockchain anchor. Every one of those is what the technical part of the certificate has to describe. ProofSnap does not sign your certificate: Part A and Part B are signed by people. What it supplies is the awkward part: a hash worth certifying at all.

Most Indian disputes reach a forum that works from the file you lodge. Our guide to consumer commission evidence covers the two year limitation under section 69 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 and filing on e-Jagriti, the cyber fraud guide covers the 1930 helpline and the three-working-day RBI liability rule, and the defamation and takedown guide covers section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the IT Rules timelines. The section 63 certificate guide explains what goes in Part A and Part B. Pricing starts at $8.99/month (about ₹860) with a 7-day free trial that requires a payment card. Used by advocates, compliance teams and investigators in 23 countries.

· · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier

41s
Per capture
11-15
Files per evidence package
27
EU states, legal recognition
7 days
7-day trial, credit card required

Trusted by professionals at

State Attorney General's Office · Süddeutsche Zeitung · Coty Inc · Hogan Lovells

Powered by Disig a.s., an EU-accredited Qualified Trust Service Provider under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Why do Indian courts reject screenshots?

United States courts rejected screenshot evidence in US v. Vayner, Griffin v. State and Serrano v. Cruz-Angeles. The authentication gap they identified is the same one here.

No timestamp proof

File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.

No tampering detection

Any screenshot can be edited in 10 seconds with AI. In Sept 2025, a California judge dismissed a case after discovering deepfaked video evidence. Without an SHA-256 hash, there's no way to prove yours is real.

No chain of custody

Who captured it? When? On what device? How was it stored? Screenshots don't answer any of these questions. Under section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, an electronic record needs a certificate stating its hash value.

Your screenshot

  • 1 JPEG file, no proof it's real
  • No timestamp, could have been taken anytime
  • Editable in Photoshop in 10 seconds
  • "Anyone could have made this", judge

ProofSnap evidence package

  • Up to 15 files, screenshot, HTML, metadata, forensic log
  • Blockchain timestamp, immutable proof of when
  • Video of capture + Provenance Certificate
  • Chain of custody, and the hash the section 63 certificate needs

Built for how disputes start in India

Capture it before they delete it

Most Indian matters are decided from a file: a consumer complaint lodged on e-Jagriti, a bank assessing customer liability, a grievance officer with fifteen days to decide, a court asked for an interim injunction. Every one of them will accept an electronic record only with a section 63 certificate, and that certificate has to state the hash value of the record.

Section 63: the certificate wants a hash

From 1 July 2024 section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam replaced section 65B. The certificate is in two parts, signed by the person in lawful control of the device and by an expert, and it must state the hash value of the record. The Supreme Court upheld that requirement in May 2026 in Pune Bar Association v. Union of India, W.P.(C) No. 599/2026, describing the hash as “synonymous with an electronic fingerprint”, and holding that the expert who signs Part B need not be an Examiner of Electronic Evidence notified under section 79A of the IT Act. See the section 63 certificate guide.

Cyber fraud: minutes, then three days

Reporting on 1930 inside the golden hour is what can freeze the money. Notifying the bank within three working days is what leaves the customer with zero liability under the RBI framework, with the credit due in ten working days. Both ask what you were shown. See the cyber fraud evidence guide.

Consumer commission: two years, filed online

Section 69 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 bars a complaint filed more than two years after the cause of action, condonation aside. Filing is on e-Jagriti and the matter runs on documents and affidavits. See the consumer commission evidence guide.

Defamation and takedown pull apart

Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced IPC 499 and 500 from 1 July 2024. Under the IT Rules the grievance officer acknowledges in twenty-four hours and decides in fifteen days, so the post is often gone before any court sees it. See the defamation and takedown guide.

Guides for Indian matters

Pick the forum you are dealing with

Each guide covers the deadlines that apply, what the decision maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.

India has no equivalent of an EU qualified timestamp, so treat the eIDAS option as useful for cross-border matters rather than as a presumption before an Indian court. Different country? See ProofSnap in the UK, South Africa, Australia or Canada.

Official Indian sources

The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than taking our word for it.

ProofSnap is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. Section 63 does not oblige anyone to accept a capture. It requires a certificate stating the hash value of the record, and the package is built to make that hash worth stating.

Don't trust us. Trust the maths.

Three vendor approaches. One critical difference.

Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.

ProofSnap Page Vault / Pagefreezer Notary / Wayback Machine
Verifiable without the vendor? Yes, SHA-256 + OpenTimestamps work forever No, verification requires their portal No, depends on archive availability
What if the vendor disappears? Evidence still valid Evidence becomes hard to defend Wayback can be wiped on request
Independent court-expert verification Any IT expert, in 60 seconds Requires vendor cooperation Requires manual screenshot
Cryptographic proof in the file itself Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) Proprietary format None
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
Spanish IP lawyer using ProofSnap
Verify a sample evidence package yourself

No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP

View the open-source verifier on GitHub

See ProofSnap in Action

Watch how ProofSnap captures legally admissible web evidence with blockchain timestamping in just 41 seconds.

ProofSnap Demo - Create verifiable evidence with screenshots and blockchain
0:41

Learn how ProofSnap creates court-admissible digital evidence in 41 seconds

Click to watch on YouTube

What you get in 41 seconds

One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.

Visual Evidence

screenshot.jpeg

Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage

evidence.pdf

Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata

Complete Page Data

page.html

Complete HTML source code of the page

domtextcontent.txt

Extracted visible text content

metadata.json

URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate

Forensic Integrity

forensic_log.json

ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain

chain_of_custody.json

Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification

Cryptographic Proof

manifest.json

SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package

manifest.sig

RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest

publickey.pem

Public key for independent signature verification

Blockchain Timestamp

manifest.json.ots

OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain

Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Cannot be forged or backdated. Independently verifiable by anyone.

Provenance Certificate

provenance_certificate.pdf

Anti-deepfake certificate with 8 integrity checks proving the evidence is an unaltered original

c2pa.json

C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA / Content Authenticity Initiative tools and aligned with EU AI Act Art. 50

As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest prove your capture is authentic, not AI-generated or manipulated. Required under EU AI Act Art. 50 (Aug 2026).

Video of Capture

capture_video.webm

Screen recording included in the evidence package, three modes:

  • Auto: records the capture process (~60s), page scroll, screenshots, metadata extraction.
  • Manual: press Start before playing media on the page (live stream, infringer video, deepfake), Stop & Capture when done. Up to 5 min on Essential / Pro, 10 min on Enterprise / Company.
  • Session: multi-tab. Records continuously while you browse across multiple tabs, then bundles a per-tab forensic package for every visited tab (full-page screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) into one signed ZIP.

All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, so any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.

SESSION CAPTURE

Multi-tab forensics in one ZIP

Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.

Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.

See exactly what a court receives

Download Sample Evidence Package

Open the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we'll capture it for you free (URL must be publicly accessible, no login, paywall or geo-block).

The burden of proof, reversed inside the EU

ProofSnap's eIDAS qualified timestamps shift the legal burden. Under EU Regulation 910/2014, Article 41, your evidence is legally presumed accurate, and the opposing party must prove otherwise. This presumption operates in the 27 EU member states. It has no effect before an Indian court, where what counts is the section 63 certificate and the hash value it states.

With ProofSnap eIDAS timestamp

  • Opponent must prove your evidence is fake
  • Legal presumption of accuracy (eIDAS Art. 41)
  • Automatically recognised in all 27 EU member states
  • No expert witness needed to explain the technology
  • Dual timestamp: eIDAS qualified + Bitcoin blockchain

Regular screenshot or blockchain-only

  • You must prove your evidence is real
  • No legal presumption, judge decides case by case
  • Court recognition varies by country
  • May need expert witness to explain blockchain
  • Deepfake objection can invalidate entire evidence

eIDAS qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., an accredited EU Qualified Trust Service Provider under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Flexible Plans for Every Stage

Choose your plan and activate it directly in the app.

→ Save 20%

Essential (Annual)

$8.99

about ₹860

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 100

  • 7-day trial, card required
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 5/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp (eIDAS)

Regular use, archiving

Most Popular

Professional (Annual)

$16.99

about ₹1,625

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 200

  • 7-day trial, card required
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: 15/mo
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp (eIDAS)

Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation

Premium

Enterprise (Annual)

$28.99

about ₹2,775

per month

Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited

  • 7-day trial, card required
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 50/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 10/mo (eIDAS)

1 stamp during trial

High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows

Company Plans

Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.

Best Value

Annual

$190

about ₹18,200

/licence/year

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day trial, card required
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within 1 business day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)

1 stamp during trial

Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises

Monthly

$18.99

about ₹1,820

/licence/month

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day trial, card required
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within 1 business day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)

1 stamp during trial

Flexible monthly billing for teams

No subscription? Pay-as-you-go SnapPacks.

One-off purchase, no auto-renewal. Credits valid 12 months (Standard SnapPack never expires).

Standard SnapPack

10 captures · no expiration

$4.99

about ₹480

All features: export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.

eIDAS SnapPack

EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)

$24.99 / 5 stamps

$5.00 (about ₹480) / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 (about ₹670) or 10× $49.99 (about ₹4,780)

Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS Art. 41). Includes whitelabel branding on evidence PDF.

Video SnapPack

30-min recording with audio + bundled credits

$59.99 / 3 videos

$19.99 (about ₹1,910) / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 (about ₹2,390) or 10× $169.99 (about ₹16,300)

Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. Whitelabel branding included.

Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →

Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.

Start the 7-day trial, card required
4.5/5 on Chrome Web Store

The statute names the artefact

India names the artefact. Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, in force since 1 July 2024, allows an electronic record to be admitted without producing the original device, but only with a certificate. That certificate is completed in two parts, by the person in lawful control of the device and by an expert, and it must state the hash value of the record. Courts have treated the hash as an electronic fingerprint for testing whether a file has been altered. A capture generates that hash when the page is preserved rather than reconstructing it later. The certificate is still signed by people, and nothing here is legal advice.

Section 63 BSA, the certificate

Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 came into force on 1 July 2024 and replaced section 65B of the Evidence Act. An electronic record is admissible without producing the original device only when a certificate accompanies it, and under section 63(4)(c) that certificate must state the hash value of the record. No other jurisdiction we publish for names the artefact this directly.

Two signatures, one hash

The certificate is completed in two parts. Part A is signed by the person in lawful control of the device, Part B by an expert who certifies the technical particulars. ProofSnap signs neither: it supplies the hash, the URL, the capture time in UTC and the technical detail that Part B describes.

Most disputes never reach a court

The consumer commissions and the grievance officers decide the volume, and both work from evidence filed in advance. Neither applies the rules of evidence strictly, and both still weigh how reliable a record looks.

Deadlines are short and unforgiving

Two years to file a consumer complaint. Three working days to keep zero liability on an unauthorised bank transaction. Fifteen days for a grievance officer to decide. None of them waits while you look for a copy of a deleted page.

What a capture does and does not do: it fixes the content, the address and the time, and it produces the hash the certificate has to state. It does not make a record admissible by itself, it does not sign the certificate, and eIDAS carries no presumption before an Indian court.

Prices are charged in USD. The approximate rupee figure shown under each price is for orientation only, converted at about ₹96 to US$1. Your card issuer sets the actual rate on the day. The 7-day trial requires a payment card and you are not charged if you cancel before it ends.

Paying from India: two things worth knowing

Billing is in USD through Stripe. Cards issued in India work, but recurring international charges follow the Reserve Bank of India e-mandate framework, and that trips some cards up.

1. Recurring charges need an e-mandate. Under the RBI framework, a recurring card transaction can be processed without additional factor authentication up to ₹15,000 per transaction. A monthly plan at $8.99 (about ₹860) sits well inside that. Some issuers still decline mandates denominated in a foreign currency, and older cards outside the framework are being phased out, so a declined subscription is usually the issuer rather than the checkout.

2. If the mandate fails, use a SnapPack. A SnapPack at $4.99 (about ₹480) is a single up-front charge with no subscription and no auto-renewal, so it clears as an ordinary international transaction. For one matter that is usually the right purchase anyway.

Rupee figures on this page are indicative only, converted at about ₹96 to US$1, and your card issuer sets the actual rate. Firms that need an invoice can email support@getproofsnap.com.

Done-for-You Service

Not the DIY type? We capture it for you.

For one-off legal disputes, single fraud reports, or anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall or geo-block) and we deliver the same 15-file court-ready package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), video + audio recording for capturing video evidence, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor, all included. Not sure what will hold up? Just tell us your situation and we’ll design the strongest possible evidence for your case.

Web capture · you send a URL

Single Capture

1 URL · delivered in 12 hours

$44.99about ₹4,300
  • Video + audio recording
  • Multi-tab session
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp
  • Bitcoin blockchain anchor
  • 15-file ZIP + PDF court bundle
Order Single · $44.99 (about ₹4,300)
Best value

Evidence Pack

Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 12 hours

$149 · $29.80 (about ₹2,850) / URL
  • All features from Single, ×5
  • Unified chain-of-custody
  • Takedown bundles & fraud chains
  • Single ZIP + per-URL PDFs
  • 33% bundle discount vs. 5x Single
Order Evidence Pack · $149 (about ₹14,250)

File certification · you send the files

Already have the evidence as files? We authenticate chat exports, recordings, and documents as-is. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.

File Certification

1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours

$59.99about ₹5,750
  • Files you already have (chat export, document, audio, video)
  • One evidence item can be several related files
  • Readable transcript rendered (chat exports)
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp + Bitcoin anchor
  • Signed ZIP + certificate PDF
Order File Certification · $59.99 (about ₹5,750)

Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) 910/2014.

Need more info, or have a detailed URL list to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.

See full comparison & FAQ →

Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works in your jurisdiction on WhatsApp evidence by country, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.

Who Uses ProofSnap and Why

Legal professionals icon

Lawyers, Auditors & Compliance

Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance

  • Timestamped snapshots for dispute resolution
  • Audit-ready exports for regulatory filings
  • Cryptographic hash for integrity
  • Contract, Employment disputes
Legal professional testimonial for ProofSnap
"Screenshots aren't enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need."
Legal Professional
Journalist icon

Journalists & Digital Investigators

Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research

  • Capture controversial posts or deleted pages
  • Export as PDF or ZIP for transparency
  • Embed source URL, timestamp, browser context
  • Digital forensics, website changes, online harassment
Journalist testimonial for ProofSnap
"ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it's edited, censored, or erased."
Investigative Journalist
HR professionals icon

HR Managers, Recruiters, Visa Officers, Talent Ops

Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records

  • LinkedIn profile snapshots for candidate verification, post validation, and prevention of profile falsification
  • Timestamped proof for employment validation and visa processing
  • Archive candidate documents for compliance and audit
  • Save snapshots of onboarding portals and signed contracts
  • HR archiving, onboarding version control, and data integrity
HR professional testimonial for ProofSnap evidence capture
"It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews."
HR Director
Anyone icon

Anyone Who Needs Trusted Snapshots

Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later

  • Save pricing pages, policies, receipts
  • Archive agreements or service terms
  • Use for personal records or disputes
  • Online casino bonus terms, payout disputes, gambling chargebacks
  • Exportable, portable, legally meaningful
Individual user testimonial for ProofSnap web evidence tool
"I don't just save what I see, I save what it means."
OSINT Researcher

Resources & Insights

Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.

NEW 2026 Deepfake Defence

How Evidence Survives Deepfake Objections Under FRE 707

Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks. Case law: Mendones v. Cushman (2025). FRE 707, Louisiana Act 250, EU AI Act Art. 50.

8 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Evidence Authentication

How to Authenticate Web Evidence That Survives Cross-Examination

Screenshots fail under FRE 901. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, ISO 27037 chain of custody, and open-source verification survive. Case law, Page Vault comparison.

7 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Divorce & Custody

Divorce & Custody: How to Capture Social Media Evidence for Court

81% of divorce attorneys report a surge in social media evidence (AAML). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, dating apps before they disappear. Family court and financial remedy proceedings. CPR 32, eIDAS Article 41.

14 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying Evidence: How to Document It for Police & Court

46% of teens cyberbullied. Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, EU laws.

12 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Brand Protection

Brand Protection for E-Commerce: Amazon, Temu & Global Marketplaces

$467B counterfeit trade. Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. US Lanham Act, EU DSA, eIDAS 2, FRE 901. Case law & evidence playbook.

35 min read Read article
NEW 2026 OSINT

OSINT 101: Preserve Social Media Evidence Before It’s Deleted

X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. FRE 901 authentication, blockchain timestamps, GDPR, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQ. OSINT guide.

40 min read Read article

Frequently Asked Questions

Contact Us

Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.

Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com