Visual Evidence
screenshot.jpeg
Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage
evidence.pdf
Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata
The only web evidence tool whose proofs survive even if our company disappears. Self-verifiable cryptography, no vendor lock-in, no “trust us” required.
Tamper-proof cryptographic evidence courts accept: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, capture video, Provenance Certificate. One click. 41 seconds.
From $8.99/mo (about ₹860) · Up to 15 files per package · 23 countries
Also available for Microsoft Edge · The only extension with legally binding EU timestamps in all 27 member states
In India, section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 has required since 1 July 2024 that a certificate accompanying an electronic record state the hash value of that record. ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures any web page in about 41 seconds and produces exactly that hash, signed and timestamped.
Indian evidence law names the exact artefact a forensic capture produces. Since 1 July 2024, section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 has replaced section 65B of the Evidence Act. An electronic record is admissible without producing the original device, but only with a certificate, and that certificate must now be signed in two parts, by the person in lawful control of the device and by an expert, and under section 63(4)(c) it must state the hash value of the record. Courts have described that hash as an electronic fingerprint that lets them test whether a file has been altered. A 2026 study by Dr Arti Singh in the International Innovations and Scholarly Trends Journal (IISTJ), covering 82 trial court orders from Delhi and Mumbai between July 2024 and August 2026, found that certificate-related rejections of electronic evidence fell from 67 per cent to 3.6 per cent after the change, but that overall rejection still ran at 37.8 per cent, and that 61.3 per cent of those rejections were for non-production of the hash value. That is the whole argument on this page: a phone screenshot has no hash worth certifying, and a captured package has one generated at the moment of capture.
ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures a web page, a chat or a dashboard in about 41 seconds and returns a package containing the full page, the saved source, the URL, the capture time in UTC, an SHA-256 hash of every file, an RSA-4096 signature and a Bitcoin blockchain anchor. Every one of those is what the technical part of the certificate has to describe. ProofSnap does not sign your certificate: Part A and Part B are signed by people. What it supplies is the awkward part: a hash worth certifying at all.
Most Indian disputes reach a forum that works from the file you lodge. Our guide to consumer commission evidence covers the two year limitation under section 69 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 and filing on e-Jagriti, the cyber fraud guide covers the 1930 helpline and the three-working-day RBI liability rule, and the defamation and takedown guide covers section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the IT Rules timelines. The section 63 certificate guide explains what goes in Part A and Part B. Pricing starts at $8.99/month (about ₹860) with a 7-day free trial that requires a payment card. Used by advocates, compliance teams and investigators in 23 countries.
By Radim Motycka, Founder & Lead Engineer, ProofSnap · · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier
Trusted by professionals at
Powered by Disig a.s., an EU-accredited Qualified Trust Service Provider under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.
United States courts rejected screenshot evidence in US v. Vayner, Griffin v. State and Serrano v. Cruz-Angeles. The authentication gap they identified is the same one here.
File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.
Any screenshot can be edited in 10 seconds with AI. In Sept 2025, a California judge dismissed a case after discovering deepfaked video evidence. Without an SHA-256 hash, there's no way to prove yours is real.
Who captured it? When? On what device? How was it stored? Screenshots don't answer any of these questions. Under section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, an electronic record needs a certificate stating its hash value.
Your screenshot
ProofSnap evidence package
Built for how disputes start in India
Most Indian matters are decided from a file: a consumer complaint lodged on e-Jagriti, a bank assessing customer liability, a grievance officer with fifteen days to decide, a court asked for an interim injunction. Every one of them will accept an electronic record only with a section 63 certificate, and that certificate has to state the hash value of the record.
From 1 July 2024 section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam replaced section 65B. The certificate is in two parts, signed by the person in lawful control of the device and by an expert, and it must state the hash value of the record. The Supreme Court upheld that requirement in May 2026 in Pune Bar Association v. Union of India, W.P.(C) No. 599/2026, describing the hash as “synonymous with an electronic fingerprint”, and holding that the expert who signs Part B need not be an Examiner of Electronic Evidence notified under section 79A of the IT Act. See the section 63 certificate guide.
Reporting on 1930 inside the golden hour is what can freeze the money. Notifying the bank within three working days is what leaves the customer with zero liability under the RBI framework, with the credit due in ten working days. Both ask what you were shown. See the cyber fraud evidence guide.
Section 69 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 bars a complaint filed more than two years after the cause of action, condonation aside. Filing is on e-Jagriti and the matter runs on documents and affidavits. See the consumer commission evidence guide.
Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced IPC 499 and 500 from 1 July 2024. Under the IT Rules the grievance officer acknowledges in twenty-four hours and decides in fifteen days, so the post is often gone before any court sees it. See the defamation and takedown guide.
Guides for Indian matters
Each guide covers the deadlines that apply, what the decision maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.
Two signatures and a hash value, since 1 July 2024.
Three working days for zero liability, minutes for the money.
Two years from the cause of action, filed on e-Jagriti.
BNS 356, and a grievance officer with 15 days.
India has no equivalent of an EU qualified timestamp, so treat the eIDAS option as useful for cross-border matters rather than as a presumption before an Indian court. Different country? See ProofSnap in the UK, South Africa, Australia or Canada.
The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than taking our word for it.
ProofSnap is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. Section 63 does not oblige anyone to accept a capture. It requires a certificate stating the hash value of the record, and the package is built to make that hash worth stating.
Don't trust us. Trust the maths.
Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.
| ProofSnap | Page Vault / Pagefreezer | Notary / Wayback Machine | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verifiable without the vendor? | Yes, SHA-256 + OpenTimestamps work forever | No, verification requires their portal | No, depends on archive availability |
| What if the vendor disappears? | Evidence still valid | Evidence becomes hard to defend | Wayback can be wiped on request |
| Independent court-expert verification | Any IT expert, in 60 seconds | Requires vendor cooperation | Requires manual screenshot |
| Cryptographic proof in the file itself | Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) | Proprietary format | None |
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP
Watch how ProofSnap captures legally admissible web evidence with blockchain timestamping in just 41 seconds.
Learn how ProofSnap creates court-admissible digital evidence in 41 seconds
Click to watch on YouTube
One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.
screenshot.jpeg
Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage
evidence.pdf
Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata
page.html
Complete HTML source code of the page
domtextcontent.txt
Extracted visible text content
metadata.json
URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate
forensic_log.json
ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain
chain_of_custody.json
Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification
manifest.json
SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package
manifest.sig
RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest
publickey.pem
Public key for independent signature verification
manifest.json.ots
OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain
Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Cannot be forged or backdated. Independently verifiable by anyone.
provenance_certificate.pdf
Anti-deepfake certificate with 8 integrity checks proving the evidence is an unaltered original
c2pa.json
C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA / Content Authenticity Initiative tools and aligned with EU AI Act Art. 50
As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest prove your capture is authentic, not AI-generated or manipulated. Required under EU AI Act Art. 50 (Aug 2026).
capture_video.webm
Screen recording included in the evidence package, three modes:
All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, so any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.
manifest.json.tsr
EU qualified timestamp (RFC 3161, eIDAS Art. 41), admissible in all 27 EU member states.
Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.
Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.
See exactly what a court receives
Download Sample Evidence PackageOpen the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we'll capture it for you free (URL must be publicly accessible, no login, paywall or geo-block).
Independent legal opinion · 21 April 2026
The opinion was prepared by SEDLAKOVA LEGAL s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Bar Association, Company ID 05669871) under EU law (Regulation 910/2014, eIDAS) with reference to Czech civil procedure. Cross-references to the US Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE 901, 902(13)-(14), proposed FRE 707) and the English Civil Procedure Rules (CPR 32, 35) added by the ProofSnap team for orientation of common-law readers. The opinion does not cover Indian law. For India the operative provision is section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam and the certificate it requires, and no opinion makes a record admissible by itself.
FRE 901 · FRE 902(13)-(14) · CPR 32 · eIDAS Art. 41
ProofSnap outputs are usable as means of evidence in civil, criminal and administrative proceedings. Authentication satisfied under FRE 901 / 902 in the US, CPR 32 in the UK, and free evaluation of evidence in EU systems, reinforced by US case law (Vayner, Lorraine v. Markel, Mendones).
Notarial deed · Court reporter affidavit
The opinion describes ProofSnap as "a suitable and economical alternative" to notarial fact certification of website state. Court-reporter affidavits and notarial deeds (US$200-500, about ₹19,000-48,000; UK £200-800) require waiting time during which content can disappear; ProofSnap captures immediately with cryptographic integrity.
eIDAS Art. 41(2) · Regulation (EU) 910/2014
The qualified eIDAS timestamp issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, carries the statutory presumption of accuracy of date, time and data integrity, shifting the burden of disproof to the opposing party across all 27 EU member states.
“The outputs of the ProofSnap service are, from the perspective of Czech procedural law and the EU legal framework, generally usable as means of evidence in any type of proceedings.”
Conclusion of the legal opinion, SEDLAKOVA LEGAL s.r.o., 21 April 2026
The opinion is publicly accessible, no registration. The conclusions express the legal view of the author and do not constitute binding legal advice.
ProofSnap's eIDAS qualified timestamps shift the legal burden. Under EU Regulation 910/2014, Article 41, your evidence is legally presumed accurate, and the opposing party must prove otherwise. This presumption operates in the 27 EU member states. It has no effect before an Indian court, where what counts is the section 63 certificate and the hash value it states.
eIDAS qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., an accredited EU Qualified Trust Service Provider under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.
about ₹860
per month
Monthly Snapshots: 100
Regular use, archiving
about ₹1,625
per month
Monthly Snapshots: 200
Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation
Premium
about ₹2,775
per month
Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited
1 stamp during trial
High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows
Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.
about ₹18,200
Minimum 2 licences
1 stamp during trial
Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises
about ₹1,820
Minimum 2 licences
1 stamp during trial
Flexible monthly billing for teams
One-off purchase, no auto-renewal. Credits valid 12 months (Standard SnapPack never expires).
10 captures · no expiration
about ₹480
All features: export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.
EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)
$5.00 (about ₹480) / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 (about ₹670) or 10× $49.99 (about ₹4,780)
Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS Art. 41). Includes whitelabel branding on evidence PDF.
30-min recording with audio + bundled credits
$19.99 (about ₹1,910) / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 (about ₹2,390) or 10× $169.99 (about ₹16,300)
Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. Whitelabel branding included.
Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →
Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.
India names the artefact. Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, in force since 1 July 2024, allows an electronic record to be admitted without producing the original device, but only with a certificate. That certificate is completed in two parts, by the person in lawful control of the device and by an expert, and it must state the hash value of the record. Courts have treated the hash as an electronic fingerprint for testing whether a file has been altered. A capture generates that hash when the page is preserved rather than reconstructing it later. The certificate is still signed by people, and nothing here is legal advice.
Section 63 BSA, the certificate
Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 came into force on 1 July 2024 and replaced section 65B of the Evidence Act. An electronic record is admissible without producing the original device only when a certificate accompanies it, and under section 63(4)(c) that certificate must state the hash value of the record. No other jurisdiction we publish for names the artefact this directly.
Two signatures, one hash
The certificate is completed in two parts. Part A is signed by the person in lawful control of the device, Part B by an expert who certifies the technical particulars. ProofSnap signs neither: it supplies the hash, the URL, the capture time in UTC and the technical detail that Part B describes.
Most disputes never reach a court
The consumer commissions and the grievance officers decide the volume, and both work from evidence filed in advance. Neither applies the rules of evidence strictly, and both still weigh how reliable a record looks.
Deadlines are short and unforgiving
Two years to file a consumer complaint. Three working days to keep zero liability on an unauthorised bank transaction. Fifteen days for a grievance officer to decide. None of them waits while you look for a copy of a deleted page.
What a capture does and does not do: it fixes the content, the address and the time, and it produces the hash the certificate has to state. It does not make a record admissible by itself, it does not sign the certificate, and eIDAS carries no presumption before an Indian court.
Prices are charged in USD. The approximate rupee figure shown under each price is for orientation only, converted at about ₹96 to US$1. Your card issuer sets the actual rate on the day. The 7-day trial requires a payment card and you are not charged if you cancel before it ends.
Billing is in USD through Stripe. Cards issued in India work, but recurring international charges follow the Reserve Bank of India e-mandate framework, and that trips some cards up.
1. Recurring charges need an e-mandate. Under the RBI framework, a recurring card transaction can be processed without additional factor authentication up to ₹15,000 per transaction. A monthly plan at $8.99 (about ₹860) sits well inside that. Some issuers still decline mandates denominated in a foreign currency, and older cards outside the framework are being phased out, so a declined subscription is usually the issuer rather than the checkout.
2. If the mandate fails, use a SnapPack. A SnapPack at $4.99 (about ₹480) is a single up-front charge with no subscription and no auto-renewal, so it clears as an ordinary international transaction. For one matter that is usually the right purchase anyway.
Rupee figures on this page are indicative only, converted at about ₹96 to US$1, and your card issuer sets the actual rate. Firms that need an invoice can email support@getproofsnap.com.
Done-for-You Service
For one-off legal disputes, single fraud reports, or anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall or geo-block) and we deliver the same 15-file court-ready package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), video + audio recording for capturing video evidence, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor, all included. Not sure what will hold up? Just tell us your situation and we’ll design the strongest possible evidence for your case.
Web capture · you send a URL
1 URL · delivered in 12 hours
Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 12 hours
File certification · you send the files
Already have the evidence as files? We authenticate chat exports, recordings, and documents as-is. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.
1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours
Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) 910/2014.
Need more info, or have a detailed URL list to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.
Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works in your jurisdiction on WhatsApp evidence by country, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.
Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance
"Screenshots aren't enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need."
Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research
"ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it's edited, censored, or erased."
Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records
"It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews."
Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later
"I don't just save what I see, I save what it means."
Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.
Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks. Case law: Mendones v. Cushman (2025). FRE 707, Louisiana Act 250, EU AI Act Art. 50.
Screenshots fail under FRE 901. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, ISO 27037 chain of custody, and open-source verification survive. Case law, Page Vault comparison.
81% of divorce attorneys report a surge in social media evidence (AAML). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, dating apps before they disappear. Family court and financial remedy proceedings. CPR 32, eIDAS Article 41.
46% of teens cyberbullied. Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, EU laws.
$467B counterfeit trade. Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. US Lanham Act, EU DSA, eIDAS 2, FRE 901. Case law & evidence playbook.
X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. FRE 901 authentication, blockchain timestamps, GDPR, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQ. OSINT guide.
Regular screenshots can be challenged in court because they carry no proof of when they were taken or whether they have been altered. In India the framework is unusually specific. Since 1 July 2024, section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 has replaced section 65B of the Evidence Act: an electronic record is admissible without producing the original device, but only with a certificate, and that certificate is signed in two parts, by the person in lawful control of the device and by an expert, and it must state the hash value of the record. Courts have described that hash as an electronic fingerprint for testing whether a file has been altered.
ProofSnap addresses this by creating a forensic evidence package containing an SHA-256 hash proving the content has not been modified, an RSA-4096 digital signature for authenticity, a Bitcoin blockchain anchor and full metadata including the URL and the capture time in UTC. The hash is generated when the page is captured rather than reconstructed later, which is the difference between a certificate that describes the record and one that describes what survived being forwarded. ProofSnap does not sign the certificate: Part A and Part B are signed by people, and nothing here is legal advice.
ProofSnap uses three layers of cryptographic protection:
Together, these mechanisms create a chain of integrity that proves the evidence is authentic, unaltered, and was captured at a specific point in time.
The eIDAS 2 regulation (EU 2024/1183) is fully rolling out by the end of 2026, establishing stricter standards for electronic identification, digital signatures, and qualified electronic timestamps across all EU member states.
Under Article 41, qualified electronic timestamps enjoy a legal presumption of accuracy for the date and time they indicate, and the integrity of the data to which the timestamp is linked. This means evidence timestamped with a qualified service is admissible across all EU courts.
ProofSnap's cryptographic proofs align with eIDAS 2 requirements: SHA-256 hashing for data integrity, RSA-4096 digital signatures for authenticity, and blockchain timestamps via OpenTimestamps for independent time verification. This makes ProofSnap evidence packages suitable for legal proceedings in any EU jurisdiction.
Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.
Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com