Visual Evidence
screenshot.jpeg
Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage
evidence.pdf
Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata
The only web evidence tool whose proofs survive even if our company disappears. Self-verifiable cryptography, no vendor lock-in, no “trust us” required.
Tamper-proof cryptographic evidence courts accept: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, capture video, Provenance Certificate. One click. 41 seconds.
From $8.99/mo (approx. NZ$16) · Up to 15 files per package · 23 countries
Also available for Microsoft Edge · The only extension with legally binding EU timestamps in all 27 member states
ProofSnap is a Chrome & Edge extension that captures web pages as court-admissible evidence in 41 seconds. Three capture options: single page, multi-tab browsing session (with per-tab forensic packages), or signed video proof (Auto, Manual, or Session-wide screen recording). Every capture includes a SHA-256 cryptographic hash, RSA-4096 digital signature, Bitcoin blockchain timestamp via OpenTimestamps, and a Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks for deepfake detection. In New Zealand, this speaks directly to section 137 of the Evidence Act 2006: where a machine, device or technical process generally does what a party asserts it does, it is presumed to have done so on the occasion in question, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. New Zealand runs one national evidence statute rather than a state-by-state patchwork, so the same test applies wherever you file. The presumption can still be displaced, which is why it matters how well the capture documents itself, and that is exactly what a hash, a signature and an independent timestamp answer. Our guide to tribunal evidence works through this in detail. The same signed package strengthens a Disputes Tribunal or Tenancy Tribunal application, a defamation claim under the Defamation Act 1992, a complaint to Netsafe under the Harmful Digital Communications Act, or a report to the National Cyber Security Centre. Enterprise plans add eIDAS-qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, for extra international weight. Evidence packages also line up with FRE 901 (US), eIDAS Article 41 (EU) and comparable rules in Germany, Italy and France. Pricing starts at $8.99/month with a 7-day free trial requiring a credit card. Used by lawyers, STR hosts, copyright enforcement firms, and compliance teams in 23 countries.
By Radim Motycka, Founder & Lead Engineer, ProofSnap · · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier
Trusted by professionals at
Powered by Disig a.s., an EU-accredited Qualified Trust Service Provider under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.
United States courts rejected screenshot evidence in US v. Vayner, Griffin v. State and Serrano v. Cruz-Angeles. The authentication gap they identified is the same one here.
File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.
Any screenshot can be edited in 10 seconds with AI. In Sept 2025, a California judge dismissed a case after discovering deepfaked video evidence. Without a SHA-256 hash, there's no way to prove yours is real.
Who captured it? When? On what device? How was it stored? Screenshots don't answer any of these questions. Under FRE 901 and eIDAS Art. 41, digital evidence requires authentication.
Your screenshot
ProofSnap evidence package
Built for how disputes start in New Zealand
Most New Zealand disputes never reach the High Court. They start at the Disputes Tribunal or the Tenancy Tribunal, with a personal grievance raised inside 90 days, or with a post that disappears the moment someone lawyers up. The National Cyber Security Centre recorded NZ$5.6 million in direct losses in the first quarter of 2026 alone. Whether you are filing a tribunal application, raising a grievance, or complaining to Netsafe, ProofSnap locks the record in seconds, with a signed PDF and a SHA-256 hash that holds up when the other side says "that screenshot is fake".
Tenancy, building, vehicle and consumer disputes are decided on listings, inspection photos and message threads. The Disputes Tribunal limit rose to NZ$60,000 on 24 January 2026 and follows no formal rules of evidence, so a referee weighs whose account to prefer. A landlord or trader who says the listing never said that is much harder to believe against a hashed, timestamped capture. See the detail in our guide to Disputes and Tenancy Tribunal evidence.
New Zealand gives you two years from publication and, unlike Australia, requires no pre-action notice and imposes no statutory serious harm threshold. The courts here work with a more-than-minor-harm test instead. You still have to prove what was published, by whom, and how far it spread. Capture the post, the account and the reach while the page is live, because a deleted post is a deleted case. See our guide to defamation evidence in New Zealand.
Netsafe is the Approved Agency for complaints under the Harmful Digital Communications Act, and the District Court can order material taken down, order the conduct to stop, or order a correction or an apology. Both steps need proof of the communication, and it often vanishes while you are still filling in the form. Capture it first, complain second, as explained in our guide to Netsafe and HDCA evidence.
The NCSC recorded NZ$5.6 million in direct losses in the first quarter of 2026, and the security vendor Gen reports e-shop scams up 87 per cent across the first half of the year. Lock the listing, the price, the promised delivery, the fake dashboard and the chat before the account disappears, so your bank dispute and your reports to the NCSC and Netsafe all rest on the same signed package. Our guide to scam evidence in New Zealand sets out what to capture and in what order.
If you are dealing with a single scam or one bad actor, a one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal, and no trial. Or send us the link and our team captures the court-ready package for you, no install required.
Guides for New Zealand matters
Each guide covers the deadlines that apply, what the decision maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.
Capture the communication before a takedown order removes it.
No formal rules of evidence, and a NZ$60,000 limit since 24 January 2026.
Two years from publication, and a more-than-minor-harm threshold.
Vendor data shows e-shop scams up 87 per cent. The site is gone within days.
90 days to raise it, and your access was cut on day one.
Australia splits its evidence law between a uniform scheme and three states that opted out, and its deadlines are shorter. If your matter is there, see ProofSnap in Australia. For the Republic of Ireland, see ProofSnap in Ireland, where a qualified timestamp carries an eIDAS presumption rather than mere corroboration.
The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than taking our word for it.
Don't trust us. Trust the maths.
Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.
| ProofSnap | Page Vault / Pagefreezer | Notary / Wayback Machine | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verifiable without the vendor? | Yes, SHA-256 + OpenTimestamps work forever | No, verification requires their portal | No, depends on archive availability |
| What if the vendor disappears? | Evidence still valid | Evidence becomes hard to defend | Wayback can be wiped on request |
| Independent court-expert verification | Any IT expert, in 60 seconds | Requires vendor cooperation | Requires manual screenshot |
| Cryptographic proof in the file itself | Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) | Proprietary format | None |
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP
Watch how ProofSnap captures legally admissible web evidence with blockchain timestamping in just 41 seconds.
Learn how ProofSnap creates court-admissible digital evidence in 41 seconds
Click to watch on YouTube
One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.
screenshot.jpeg
Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage
evidence.pdf
Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata
page.html
Complete HTML source code of the page
domtextcontent.txt
Extracted visible text content
metadata.json
URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate
forensic_log.json
ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain
chain_of_custody.json
Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification
manifest.json
SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package
manifest.sig
RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest
publickey.pem
Public key for independent signature verification
manifest.json.ots
OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain
Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Cannot be forged or backdated. Independently verifiable by anyone.
provenance_certificate.pdf
Anti-deepfake certificate with 8 integrity checks proving the evidence is an unaltered original
c2pa.json
C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA / Content Authenticity Initiative tools and aligned with EU AI Act Art. 50
As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest prove your capture is authentic, not AI-generated or manipulated. Required under EU AI Act Art. 50 (Aug 2026).
capture_video.webm
Screen recording included in the evidence package, three modes:
All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.
manifest.json.tsr
EU qualified timestamp (RFC 3161, eIDAS Art. 41), admissible in all 27 EU member states.
Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.
Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.
See exactly what a court receives
Download Sample Evidence PackageOpen the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we'll capture it for you free (URL must be publicly accessible, no login, paywall, or geo-block).
Independent legal opinion · 21 April 2026
The opinion was prepared by SEDLAKOVA LEGAL s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Bar Association, Company ID 05669871) under EU law (Regulation 910/2014, eIDAS) with reference to Czech civil procedure. Cross-references to the US Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE 901, 902(13)-(14), proposed FRE 707) and the English Civil Procedure Rules (CPR 32, 35) added by the ProofSnap team for orientation of common-law readers.
FRE 901 · FRE 902(13)-(14) · CPR 32 · eIDAS Art. 41
ProofSnap outputs are usable as means of evidence in civil, criminal and administrative proceedings. Authentication satisfied under FRE 901 / 902 in the US, CPR 32 in the UK, and free evaluation of evidence in EU systems, reinforced by US case law (Vayner, Lorraine v. Markel, Mendones).
Notarial deed · Court reporter affidavit
The opinion describes ProofSnap as "a suitable and economical alternative" to notarial fact certification of website state. Court-reporter affidavits and notarial deeds (US $200-500, UK £200-800) require waiting time during which content can disappear; ProofSnap captures immediately with cryptographic integrity.
eIDAS Art. 41(2) · Regulation (EU) 910/2014
The qualified eIDAS timestamp issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, carries the statutory presumption of accuracy of date, time and data integrity, shifting the burden of disproof to the opposing party, directly across all 27 EU Member States.
“The outputs of the ProofSnap service are, from the perspective of Czech procedural law and the EU legal framework, generally usable as means of evidence in any type of proceedings.”
Conclusion of the legal opinion, SEDLAKOVA LEGAL s.r.o., 21 April 2026
The opinion is publicly accessible, no registration. The conclusions express the legal view of the author and do not constitute binding legal advice.
ProofSnap's eIDAS qualified timestamps shift the legal burden. Under EU Regulation 910/2014, Article 41, your evidence is legally presumed accurate, and the opposing party must prove otherwise.
eIDAS qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., an accredited EU Qualified Trust Service Provider under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.
per month
Monthly Snapshots: 100
Regular use, archiving
per month
Monthly Snapshots: 200
Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation
Premium
per month
Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited
1 stamp during trial
High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows
Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.
Minimum 2 licences
1 stamp during trial
Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises
Minimum 2 licences
1 stamp during trial
Flexible monthly billing for teams
One-off purchase, no auto-renewal. Credits valid 12 months (Standard SnapPack never expires).
10 captures · no expiration
All features: export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.
EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)
$5.00 / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 or 10× $49.99
Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS Art. 41). Includes whitelabel branding on evidence PDF.
30-min recording with audio + bundled credits
$19.99 / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 or 10× $169.99
Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. Whitelabel branding included.
Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →
Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.
New Zealand is simpler than Australia here, and that is worth knowing if you have been reading Australian material. There is no state-by-state split and no separate uniform scheme to check. One Act applies, and the forum decides how formally it is applied.
Evidence Act 2006, section 137
Where a machine, device or technical process generally does what you assert it does, it is presumed to have done so on the occasion in question, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. That last phrase is the whole game: the presumption holds until someone gives the court a reason to doubt it.
Tribunals: no formal rules of evidence
The Disputes Tribunal decides on the substantial merits and justice of the case, having regard to the law but not bound by strict legal rights or technicalities, and allows no lawyers in all but limited circumstances. The Tenancy Tribunal works informally too, under the general principles of the law and the substantial merits and justice of the case. Material gets in freely, so weight is the only battleground.
Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017
Part 4 replaced the Electronic Transactions Act 2002. Under section 226 an electronic signature, other than a witness signature, satisfies a legal requirement if it adequately identifies the signatory, adequately indicates their approval, and is as reliable as appropriate for the purpose. Where the information has to be given to someone, that person must also consent to receiving an electronic signature. Schedule 5 still excludes wills and affidavits, and since 30 March 2025 the exclusion for powers of attorney no longer applies to a deed creating a power of attorney in connection with a security interest.
Deadlines differ sharply from Australia
A personal grievance is raised within 90 days, or 12 months where it is based on sexual harassment. A defamation claim runs two years from publication. Neither matches the Australian timeframes, so do not work from Australian guidance.
An honest note on eIDAS: New Zealand has no equivalent of the European qualified timestamp regime, so our eIDAS timestamp carries no automatic presumption in a New Zealand court or tribunal. It is corroboration from an independent, audited third party, not a legal shortcut. What does the work here is the hash, the signature and the blockchain anchor, all of which anyone can verify without trusting us.
Prices are charged in USD. The approximate New Zealand figure shown under each price is for orientation only, converted at about NZ$1.73 to US$1. Your card issuer sets the actual rate on the day. The 7-day trial requires a credit card. Prefer not to subscribe? A one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal and no trial.
Done-for-You Service
For one-off legal disputes, single fraud reports, or anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall, or geo-block) and we deliver the same 15-file court-ready package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), video + audio recording for capturing video evidence, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor, all included. Not sure what will hold up? Just tell us your situation and we’ll design the strongest possible evidence for your case.
Web capture · you send a URL
1 URL · delivered in 12 hours
Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 12 hours
File certification · you send the files
Already have the evidence as files? We authenticate chat exports, recordings, and documents as-is. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.
1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours
Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) 910/2014.
Need more info, or have a detailed URL list to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.
Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works in your jurisdiction on WhatsApp evidence by country, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.
Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance
"Screenshots aren't enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need."
Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research
"ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it's edited, censored, or erased."
Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records
"It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews."
Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later
"I don't just save what I see, I save what it means."
Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.
Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks. Case law: Mendones v. Cushman (2025). FRE 707, Louisiana Act 250, EU AI Act Art. 50.
Screenshots fail under FRE 901. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, ISO 27037 chain of custody, and open-source verification survive. Case law, Page Vault comparison.
81% of divorce attorneys report a surge in social media evidence (AAML). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, dating apps before they disappear. CA, TX, FL, NY state rules. FRE 901, eIDAS 2.
46% of teens cyberbullied. Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, EU laws.
$467B counterfeit trade. Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. US Lanham Act, EU DSA, eIDAS 2, FRE 901. Case law & evidence playbook.
X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. FRE 901 authentication, blockchain timestamps, GDPR, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQ. OSINT guide.
Regular screenshots can be challenged in court because they carry no proof of when they were taken or whether they have been altered. New Zealand law helps, but it does not do the work for you. Under section 137 of the Evidence Act 2006, where a machine, device or technical process generally does what a party asserts it does, it is presumed to have done so on the occasion in question, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. That last phrase is the opening the other side will use: produce a reason to doubt the record and the presumption falls away. Unlike Australia there is no state-by-state patchwork to navigate, because one Act applies throughout. The Disputes Tribunal and the Tenancy Tribunal are not bound by formal rules of evidence at all, deciding instead on the general principles of the law and the merits and justice of the case, but they still weigh how reliable a record looks.
ProofSnap addresses this by creating a forensic evidence package containing a SHA-256 hash proving the content has not been modified, an RSA-4096 digital signature for authenticity, a blockchain timestamp proving when the capture happened, and full metadata including the URL and the capture time in UTC. That gives a court or a tribunal referee something concrete to weigh, and it makes the section 137 presumption far harder to displace than a plain image file.
ProofSnap uses three layers of cryptographic protection:
Together, these mechanisms create a chain of integrity that proves the evidence is authentic, unaltered, and was captured at a specific point in time.
The eIDAS 2 regulation (EU 2024/1183) is fully rolling out by the end of 2026, establishing stricter standards for electronic identification, digital signatures, and qualified electronic timestamps across all EU member states.
Under Article 41, qualified electronic timestamps enjoy a legal presumption of accuracy for the date and time they indicate, and the integrity of the data to which the timestamp is linked. This means evidence timestamped with a qualified service is admissible across all EU courts.
ProofSnap's cryptographic proofs align with eIDAS 2 requirements: SHA-256 hashing for data integrity, RSA-4096 digital signatures for authenticity, and blockchain timestamps via OpenTimestamps for independent time verification. This makes ProofSnap evidence packages suitable for legal proceedings in any EU jurisdiction.
Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.
Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com