Visual Evidence
screenshot.jpeg
Full-page scrolling capture of the entire web page
evidence.pdf
Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata
The proofs in the evidence package keep working even if our company disappears. Self-verifiable cryptography, no vendor lock-in, no “trust us” required.
Tamper-evident cryptographic evidence built for court: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, a video of the capture itself, a Provenance Certificate. One click.
From US$8.99/month (approx. NZ$16) · Up to 15 files per package · Verifiable without us
Also available for Microsoft Edge · eIDAS qualified timestamps from a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List
ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures a web page as court-ready evidence in one click. In New Zealand, as at September 2026, each capture carries a SHA-256 hash, an RSA-4096 signature and a Bitcoin timestamp, the documented process section 137 is concerned with section 137 of the Evidence Act 2006.
Three capture options: single page, multi-tab browsing session (with per-tab forensic packages), or signed video proof (Auto, Manual, or Session-wide screen recording). Every capture also carries a Provenance Certificate recording the integrity checks that ran.
That test is set out in section 137 of the Evidence Act 2006: where evidence is produced by a machine, device or technical process of a kind that ordinarily does what a party asserts it does, it is presumed to have done so on the occasion in question, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. New Zealand has one national evidence statute rather than a state-by-state patchwork, so the same test applies wherever you file. The presumption can still be displaced, which is why it matters how well the capture documents itself. A hash, a signature and an independent timestamp are what that documentation looks like. Our guide to tribunal evidence works through this in detail.
The same signed package strengthens a Disputes Tribunal or Tenancy Tribunal application, a defamation claim under the Defamation Act 1992, a complaint to Netsafe under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015, or a report to the National Cyber Security Centre. Enterprise plans add eIDAS-qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, for extra international weight. Evidence packages are also built to satisfy the rules of evidence in the United States and in England and Wales, and eIDAS in the EU. Pricing starts at $8.99/month with a 7-day free trial requiring a credit card. ProofSnap is used by lawyers, short-term rental hosts, copyright enforcement firms and compliance teams in both common law and civil law jurisdictions.
By Radim Motycka, Founder & Lead Engineer, ProofSnap · · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier
No account, nothing to set up.
Download a real evidence package. Open the PDF, read the chain of custody, then drop the whole ZIP into the Trust Verifier and watch it check the hashes, the signature and the timestamps in front of you.
Download the sample package8.8 MB ZIP. No account, no email address, nothing to install.
You send a link or the files. Within 24 hours we send back a signed, timestamped package a New Zealand court can check.
A chat export is the file the app gives you when you tap Export chat. We render it as a readable transcript, hash every file and timestamp the result, so the other side cannot argue the messages were edited.
Trusted by professionals at
Powered by Disig a.s., an EU-accredited Qualified Trust Service Provider under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.
A screenshot is not rejected for being a screenshot. It is rejected, or given no weight, when nobody can tie it to a source or a time, or show that the process it came from was working.
File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.
Any screenshot can be edited with AI. In Mendones v Cushman & Wakefield (Alameda County Superior Court, 9 September 2025) the case was dismissed with prejudice after the judge found the plaintiffs had filed AI-altered videos and images. Without a SHA-256 hash, there's no way to prove yours is real.
Who captured it? When? On what device? How was it stored? Screenshots don't answer any of these questions. Section 137 presumes a technical process did what it is asserted to have done only where the process is of a kind that ordinarily does it.
Your screenshot
ProofSnap evidence package
Built for how disputes start in New Zealand
Most New Zealand disputes never reach the High Court. They start at the Disputes Tribunal or the Tenancy Tribunal, with a personal grievance raised inside 90 days, or with a post that disappears the moment someone gets a lawyer involved. Whether you are filing a tribunal application, raising a grievance, or complaining to Netsafe, ProofSnap locks the record in one click, with a signed PDF and a SHA-256 hash that holds up when the other side says “that screenshot is fake”.
Tenancy, building, vehicle and consumer disputes are decided on listings, inspection photos and message threads. The Disputes Tribunal limit rose to NZ$60,000 on 24 January 2026 and follows no formal rules of evidence, so a referee weighs whose account to prefer. It is much harder for a landlord or trader to claim the listing never said that when you have a hashed, timestamped copy of it. See the detail in our guide to Disputes and Tenancy Tribunal evidence.
Unlike Australia, New Zealand requires no pre-action notice and imposes no statutory serious harm threshold, and the primary limitation period runs two years from publication under the Limitation Act 2010. You still have to prove what was published, by whom, and how far it spread. Capture the post, the account and the reach while the page is live, because a deleted post is a deleted case. See our guide to defamation evidence in New Zealand.
Netsafe is the Approved Agency for complaints under the Harmful Digital Communications Act, and the District Court can order material taken down, order the conduct to stop, or order a correction or an apology. The Netsafe complaint and the court application both need proof of the communication, and it often vanishes while you are still filling in the form. Capture it first, complain second, as explained in our guide to Netsafe and HDCA evidence.
The National Cyber Security Centre logged NZ$5.6 million in direct financial losses reported to it between 1 January and 31 March 2026, against NZ$3.2 million the previous quarter. Lock the listing, the price, the promised delivery, the fake dashboard and the chat before the account disappears, so your bank dispute and your reports to the NCSC and Netsafe all rest on the same signed package. Our guide to scam evidence in New Zealand sets out what to capture and in what order.
If you are dealing with a single scam or one bad actor, a one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal, and no trial. Or send us the link and our team captures the court-ready package for you, no install required.
Guides for New Zealand matters
Each guide covers the deadlines that apply, what the decision-maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.
Capture the communication before a takedown order removes it.
No formal rules of evidence, and a NZ$60,000 limit since 24 January 2026.
Two years from publication, and no statutory serious harm threshold.
The NCSC recorded NZ$5.6 million in reported losses in the first quarter of 2026, and the site is gone within days.
You have 90 days to raise it, and your access was cut off on day one.
Australia splits its evidence law between a uniform scheme and three states that opted out, and its deadlines are shorter. If your matter is there, see ProofSnap in Australia. For the Republic of Ireland, see ProofSnap in Ireland, where a qualified timestamp carries an eIDAS presumption rather than mere corroboration.
The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than taking our word for it.
Don't trust us. Trust the maths.
Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.
| ProofSnap | Page Vault / Pagefreezer | Notary / Wayback Machine | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verifiable without the vendor? | Yes, SHA-256 + OpenTimestamps work forever | No, verification requires their portal | No, depends on archive availability |
| What if the vendor disappears? | Evidence still valid | Evidence becomes hard to defend | Wayback can be wiped on request |
| Independent court-expert verification | Any competent examiner, with the scripts in the package | Requires vendor cooperation | Requires manual screenshot |
| Cryptographic proof in the file itself | Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) | Proprietary format | None |
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP
Watch how ProofSnap captures legally admissible web evidence with blockchain timestamping in just one click.
Learn how ProofSnap creates court-ready digital evidence in one click
Click to watch on YouTube
One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.
screenshot.jpeg
Full-page scrolling capture of the entire web page
evidence.pdf
Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata
page.html
Complete HTML source code of the page
domtextcontent.txt
Extracted visible text content
metadata.json
URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate
forensic_log.json
ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain
chain_of_custody.json
Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification
manifest.json
SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package
manifest.sig
RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest
publickey.pem
Public key for independent signature verification
manifest.json.ots
OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain
Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Cannot be forged or backdated. Independently verifiable by anyone.
provenance_certificate.pdf
Anti-deepfake certificate recording the integrity checks that ran on the capture
c2pa.json
C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA / Content Authenticity Initiative tools and aligned with the EU AI Act content-marking approach
As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest prove your capture is authentic, not AI-generated or manipulated. Aligned with the content-marking approach of EU AI Act Art. 50, applicable since 2 August 2026.
capture_video.webm
Screen recording included in the evidence package, in three modes:
All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, so any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.
manifest.json.tsr
EU qualified timestamp (RFC 3161, eIDAS Art. 41), carrying the Article 41(2) presumption of the accuracy of the date and time.
Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.
Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.
See exactly what a court receives
Download Sample Evidence PackageOpen the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we will capture it for you, free of charge (URL must be publicly accessible, no login, paywall, or geo-block).
Independent legal opinion · 21 April 2026
The opinion was prepared by SEDLAKOVA LEGAL s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Bar Association, Company ID 05669871) under EU law (Regulation 910/2014, eIDAS) with reference to Czech civil procedure. The New Zealand framing on this page was added by the ProofSnap team and rests on the Evidence Act 2006, not on the opinion.
Evidence Act 2006, s 137 · eIDAS Art. 41(2)
ProofSnap outputs can be used as evidence in civil, criminal and administrative proceedings. The package is built to answer the authentication question a court asks about an electronic document: under the section 137 presumption here, under the rules of evidence in the United States and in England and Wales, and under free evaluation of evidence in EU systems.
Affidavit · Notarial certificate
The opinion describes ProofSnap as “a suitable and economical alternative” to a notary's certificate recording what a website showed on a given day. Affidavits and notarial certificates take time to arrange, and the content can disappear while you wait; ProofSnap captures immediately with cryptographic integrity.
eIDAS Art. 41(2) · Regulation (EU) 910/2014
The qualified eIDAS timestamp issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, carries the eIDAS Article 41(2) presumption of the accuracy of the date and time and of the integrity of the bound data. Before a New Zealand court, that presumption is not a rule of New Zealand law; what it adds here is documented, independently checkable proof of the time.
“The outputs of the ProofSnap service are, from the perspective of Czech procedural law and the EU legal framework, generally usable as means of evidence in any type of proceedings.”
Conclusion of the legal opinion, SEDLAKOVA LEGAL s.r.o., 21 April 2026
The opinion is publicly accessible and requires no registration. The conclusions express the legal view of the author and do not constitute binding legal advice.
New Zealand deals with this in one statute, where Australia splits the same question between a uniform scheme and the states that stayed outside it. Under section 137 of the Evidence Act 2006, where evidence is produced wholly or partly by a machine, device or technical process of a kind that ordinarily does what it is asserted to have done, the court presumes it did so on that occasion, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. A ProofSnap package exists to show the process is of that kind, and to leave the other side something they can actually test.
Section 137 turns on three questions, and they are asked in this order.
eIDAS qualified timestamps are issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List. The Article 41(2) presumption is a rule of EU law and does not bind a New Zealand court; what it adds here is documented, independently checkable proof of the time. Verify on EU Trusted List.
Choose your plan and activate it directly in the app.
per month
Monthly Snapshots: 100
Regular use, archiving
per month
Monthly Snapshots: 200
Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation
Premium
per month
Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited
1 stamp during trial
High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows
Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.
Minimum 2 licences
1 stamp during trial
Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises
Minimum 2 licences
1 stamp during trial
Flexible monthly billing for teams
One-off purchase, no auto-renewal. Credits are valid for 12 months (Standard SnapPack credits never expire).
10 captures · no expiry
Includes export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.
EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)
$5.00 / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 or 10× $49.99
Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS Art. 41). Includes whitelabel branding on evidence PDF.
75-min recording with audio + bundled credits
$19.99 / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 or 10× $169.99
Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. Whitelabel branding included.
Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →
Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.
New Zealand is simpler than Australia here, and that is worth knowing if you have been reading Australian material. There is no state-by-state split and no separate uniform scheme to check. One Act applies, and the forum decides how formally it is applied.
Evidence Act 2006, section 137
Where evidence is produced by a machine, device or technical process of a kind that ordinarily does what you assert it does, it is presumed to have done so on the occasion in question, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. That last phrase is the whole game: the presumption holds until someone gives the court a reason to doubt it.
Tribunals: no formal rules of evidence
The Disputes Tribunal decides on the merits rather than on technicalities, and lawyers appear only in limited circumstances. The Tenancy Tribunal works informally too, on the merits, without formal rules of evidence. Material gets in freely, so weight is the only battleground.
Deadlines differ sharply from Australia
A personal grievance must be raised within 90 days, or within 12 months where it is based on sexual harassment. A defamation claim runs two years from publication. Neither matches the Australian timeframes, so do not work from Australian guidance.
An honest note on eIDAS: New Zealand has no equivalent of the European qualified timestamp regime, so our eIDAS timestamp carries no automatic presumption in a New Zealand court or tribunal. It is corroboration from an independent, audited third party, not a legal shortcut. What does the work here is the hash, the signature and the blockchain anchor, all of which anyone can verify without trusting us.
Prices are charged in USD. The approximate New Zealand figure shown under each price is for orientation only, converted at about NZ$1.73 to US$1. Your card issuer sets the actual rate on the day. The 7-day trial requires a credit card. Prefer not to subscribe? A one-off SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal and no trial.
Done-for-You Service
For one-off legal disputes, single fraud reports, or anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall, or geo-block) and we deliver the full evidence package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), a video and audio recording of the capture, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor, all included. Not sure what will hold up? Just tell us your situation and we will work out what to capture and in what order.
Web capture · you send a URL
1 URL · delivered in 24 hours
Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 24 hours
File certification · you send the files
Already have the evidence as files? We authenticate chat exports, recordings, and documents as they are. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.
1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours
Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) 910/2014.
Need more info, or have a long list of URLs to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.
Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works in your jurisdiction on WhatsApp evidence by country, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.
Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance
“Screenshots aren’t enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need.”
Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research
“ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it’s edited, censored, or erased.”
Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records
“It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews.”
Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later
“I don’t just save what I see, I save what it means.”
Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.
Provenance certificate with integrity checks, and what a court asks once authenticity is disputed.
A bare screenshot proves nothing about its own origin. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, an ISO 27037 chain of custody and open-source verification do. Case law and what a court checks.
81% of divorce lawyers reported a rise in social networking evidence (American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, United States, 2010). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, dating apps before they disappear. What a court checks before it lets the post in.
46% of US teens aged 13 to 17 have experienced cyberbullying (Pew Research Center, 2022). Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, EU laws.
Counterfeit trade is worth US$467 billion a year (OECD and EUIPO, 2019). Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. Trade mark and consumer law, the EU DSA, and an evidence playbook.
X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. Authentication, blockchain timestamps, privacy law, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQ. OSINT guide.
Regular screenshots can be challenged in court because they carry no proof of when they were taken or whether they have been altered. New Zealand law helps, but it does not do the work for you. Under section 137 of the Evidence Act 2006, where evidence is produced by a machine, device or technical process of a kind that ordinarily does what a party asserts it does, it is presumed to have done so on the occasion in question, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. That last phrase is the opening the other side will use: produce a reason to doubt the record and the presumption falls away. Unlike Australia there is no state-by-state patchwork to navigate, because one Act applies throughout. The Disputes Tribunal and the Tenancy Tribunal are not bound by formal rules of evidence at all, deciding instead on the general principles of the law and the merits and justice of the case, but they still weigh how reliable a record looks.
ProofSnap addresses this by creating a forensic evidence package containing a SHA-256 hash proving the content has not been modified, an RSA-4096 digital signature for authenticity, a blockchain timestamp proving when the capture happened, and full metadata including the URL and the capture time in UTC. That gives a court or a tribunal referee something concrete to weigh, and it gives the other side something concrete to test rather than a bare assertion.
ProofSnap uses three layers of cryptographic protection:
Together, these mechanisms create a chain of integrity that proves the evidence is authentic, unaltered, and was captured at a specific point in time.
The eIDAS 2 regulation (EU 2024/1183) will be fully in force by the end of 2026, with stricter standards for electronic identification, digital signatures and qualified electronic timestamps.
Under Article 41(2), a qualified electronic timestamp carries a presumption of the accuracy of the date and time it indicates and of the integrity of the bound data, and nothing beyond that. It does not make anything admissible and it does not shift the burden of proof. The presumption is a rule of EU law, so it does not bind a New Zealand court.
ProofSnap's cryptographic proofs align with eIDAS 2: SHA-256 hashing for data integrity, RSA-4096 digital signatures for authenticity, and blockchain timestamps via OpenTimestamps for independent time verification. Before a New Zealand forum the weight comes from the section 137 presumption, not from eIDAS.
Forensic mode is an opt-in capture depth included in the Professional, Enterprise and Company plans (not in Essential or the SnapPacks).
Forensic mode adds a complete archive of the page's network layer: every HTTP request and response (network.har), a WARC copy of the page, all loaded resources, and the full TLS certificate chain. To capture that it attaches the debugger (the browser shows a “being debugged” banner).
Every one of those files is hashed into the RSA-4096 signed manifest, so the OpenTimestamps blockchain anchor and the eIDAS qualified timestamp cover the network archive exactly as they cover the screenshot.
Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.
Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com