ECTA section 15(3): a South African court must weigh how your record was generated, stored and kept unaltered. Can your screenshot answer that?

Screenshots get into South African courts. Then they get picked apart.
ProofSnap evidence holds up.

The only web evidence tool whose proofs survive even if our company disappears. Self-verifiable cryptography, no vendor lock-in, no “trust us” required.

Tamper-proof cryptographic evidence courts accept: hash, signature, blockchain timestamp, capture video, Provenance Certificate. One click. 41 seconds.

From $8.99/mo (about R149) · Up to 15 files per package · 23 countries

ProofSnap Chrome extension side panel, capture page snapshot, record video, EU qualified timestamp (eIDAS), and Trust Verifier

Start without installing anything

No account, nothing to set up.

No signup

See exactly what a South African court receives

Download a real evidence package. Open the PDF, read the chain of custody, then drop the whole ZIP into the Trust Verifier and watch it check the hashes, the signature and the timestamps in front of you.

Download the sample package

9.4 MB ZIP. No account, no email address, nothing to install.

Or we do it for you

You send a link or the files. We send back a signed, timestamped package a South African court can check, within 24 hours.

A chat export is the file the app gives you when you tap Export chat. We render it as a readable transcript, hash every file and timestamp the result, so the other side cannot argue the messages were edited.

ProofSnap is a Chrome and Edge extension that captures any web page as court-ready digital evidence in South Africa in about 41 seconds. Each capture is a signed package with a SHA-256 hash, an RSA-4096 signature and a Bitcoin blockchain timestamp, built to answer the reliability questions section 15(3) of the ECTA puts to a court.

Three capture options: single page, multi-tab browsing session (with per-tab forensic packages), or signed video proof (Auto, Manual, or Session-wide screen recording). Every capture also carries a Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks for deepfake detection. Under section 15(1) of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 (ECTA) a screenshot is not shut out merely because it is a data message, but its reliability is not presumed either: section 15(3) tells the court to weigh how the record was generated, stored and communicated, how its integrity was maintained and how its originator was identified. That is the gap a signed package closes, whether the matter is a CCMA referral, a Protection from Harassment Act application or a SAPS report. Enterprise plans add eIDAS-qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List, which carry a statutory presumption inside the EU and act as independent corroboration in South Africa. Pricing starts at $8.99/month (about R149) with a 7-day free trial that requires a credit card. Used by lawyers, STR hosts, copyright enforcement firms and compliance teams in 23 countries.

· · Independently verifiable via Trust Verifier

41s
Per capture
11-15
Files per evidence package
27
EU states, legal recognition
7 days
Free trial, all features

Trusted by professionals at

State Attorney General's Office · Süddeutsche Zeitung · Coty Inc · Hogan Lovells

Powered by Disig a.s., an EU-accredited Qualified Trust Service Provider under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Why South African courts discount plain screenshots

A South African court does not reject a screenshot for being electronic. Section 15(1) of the ECTA forbids exactly that. What the court does instead is weigh it, and a plain image answers almost none of the questions the statute puts. Here are the three it fails on.

"In assessing the evidential weight of a data message, regard must be had to (a) the reliability of the manner in which the data message was generated, stored or communicated; (b) the reliability of the manner in which the integrity of the data message was maintained; (c) the manner in which its originator was identified; and (d) any other relevant factor." Section 15(3), Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 (South Africa). ProofSnap is built around that list: the SHA-256 hashes answer (b), the chain of custody file answers (a), and the RSA-4096 signature plus the public key answer (c).

No timestamp proof

File timestamps can be changed in seconds. Courts know this. Without a blockchain or eIDAS-qualified timestamp, you can't prove when you captured it.

No tampering detection

Any screenshot can be edited in seconds with a generative model, and the other side knows it. Section 15(3)(b) of the ECTA asks how the integrity of the record was maintained. Without a SHA-256 hash computed at capture, a plain image has no answer.

No chain of custody

Who captured it, when, on what device, and how was it stored? A screenshot answers none of it. Section 15(3)(a) and (c) of the ECTA ask precisely those questions, and comparable rules apply under FRE 901 in the United States.

Your screenshot

  • 1 JPEG file, no proof it's real
  • No timestamp, could have been taken anytime
  • Editable in Photoshop in 10 seconds
  • "Anyone could have made this", judge

ProofSnap evidence package

  • Up to 15 files, screenshot, HTML, metadata, forensic log
  • Blockchain timestamp, immutable proof of when
  • Video of capture + Provenance Certificate
  • Chain of custody, court-ready under FRE 901

Built for how disputes start in South Africa

Capture it before they delete it

Most South African disputes never begin in the High Court. They begin with a WhatsApp message, a Facebook post, or a listing that vanishes the moment it matters. Whether you are building a CCMA case file, applying for a protection order, or relying on section 15 of ECTA, ProofSnap locks the record in seconds, with a signed PDF and a SHA-256 hash that stands up when the other side says "that screenshot is fake".

CCMA & workplace disputes

CCMA arbitrators routinely decide unfair-dismissal cases on WhatsApp group messages and social posts. Whether you are the employer or the employee, lock down the relevant messages when you open the case file, before anyone deletes or edits them.

Facebook, X & WhatsApp defamation

South African courts award real damages for defamatory posts, and even being tagged in one can make you liable. Preserve the exact post, the account, and the timestamp while it is still live, so you can prove publication before it is taken down.

Harassment protection orders

The Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011 covers electronic communication, and gives you a fast, low-cost protection order at the magistrate's court. Your application is only as strong as the evidence: capture the messages and posts as a tamper-evident package.

Gumtree & Marketplace scams

"EFT first, then I courier it." Then the seller blocks you. Lock the listing, the price, the delivery promise, and the chat before the account disappears, so you have proof for your SAPS report or bank dispute.

Just one dispute? You do not need a subscription.

If you are dealing with a single scam or one bad actor, a one-time SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal, and no trial. Or send us the link and our team captures the court-ready package for you, no install required.

Guides for South African matters

Pick the forum you are dealing with

Each guide covers the deadlines that apply, what the decision maker is actually weighing, and what to capture first.

South African law has no statutory presumption equivalent to Article 41(2) of the EU eIDAS Regulation, so treat the qualified timestamp here as independent corroboration under the section 15(3) reliability enquiry rather than as a presumption. Different country? See ProofSnap in Nigeria, the UK, Australia or Canada.

Official South African sources

The legal framing on this page rests on the following primary sources. Check them rather than taking our word for it.

Two provisions worth knowing before you capture anything

  1. Section 15(4) of the ECTA, the business-records route. A data message made by a person in the ordinary course of business, or a copy or printout certified correct by an officer in that person's service, is admissible on its mere production and is rebuttable proof of the facts it contains. If the record you need is your own company's, this is the cheapest road into evidence, and a signed capture is what makes the certification defensible.
  2. Section 14 of the ECTA, the original. Where a law requires the original, integrity is assessed by asking whether the information "has remained complete and unaltered, except for the addition of any endorsement and any change which arises in the normal course of communication, storage and display". A SHA-256 hash computed at the moment of capture is a direct demonstration of complete and unaltered.

ProofSnap is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. Section 15 does not oblige anyone to accept your capture, and it does not make a screenshot admissible on its own. It removes the objection that a record is inadmissible merely because it is electronic, and it directs the court to weigh the record. The hearsay rules still apply separately: section 3 of the Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988 governs the credibility of the human author, while section 15 governs the machine side. What our package does is give you the material to win the weight argument that section 15(3) sets up.

Don't trust us. Trust the math.

Three vendor approaches. One critical difference.

Most web-evidence tools force you to depend on them. ProofSnap evidence is self-verifiable: anyone with the ZIP can confirm authenticity using open standards (SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, eIDAS), with or without ProofSnap continuing to exist.

ProofSnap Page Vault / Pagefreezer Notary / Wayback Machine
Verifiable without the vendor? Yes, SHA-256 + OpenTimestamps work forever No, verification requires their portal No, depends on archive availability
What if the vendor disappears? Evidence still valid Evidence becomes hard to defend Wayback can be wiped on request
Independent court-expert verification Any IT expert, in 60 seconds Requires vendor cooperation Requires manual screenshot
Cryptographic proof in the file itself Yes, open standards (SHA-256, OTS, eIDAS) Proprietary format None
“Its merit is based on it being self-verifiable, and not necessarily dependent on the credit or level of trust afforded to the company or institution behind it.”
Spanish IP lawyer using ProofSnap
Verify a sample evidence package yourself

No account required · Open the Trust Verifier and drop in any ProofSnap ZIP

View the open-source verifier on GitHub

See ProofSnap in Action

Watch how ProofSnap captures legally admissible web evidence with blockchain timestamping in just 41 seconds.

ProofSnap demo: a screenshot is not evidence, see what a signed capture contains
1:28

Learn how ProofSnap creates court-admissible digital evidence in 41 seconds

Click to watch on YouTube

What you get in 41 seconds

One click in the extension. The ZIP contains 11-15 files, independently verifiable by any party or court.

Visual Evidence

screenshot.jpeg

Full-page scrolling capture of the entire webpage

evidence.pdf

Human-readable forensic summary with all metadata

Complete Page Data

page.html

Complete HTML source code of the page

domtextcontent.txt

Extracted visible text content

metadata.json

URL, timestamp, browser info, TLS certificate

Forensic Integrity

forensic_log.json

ISO/IEC 27037 forensic log with tamper-evident hash chain

chain_of_custody.json

Chain of custody with device integrity and NTP time verification

Cryptographic Proof

manifest.json

SHA-256 hashes of every file in the package

manifest.sig

RSA-4096 digital signature of the manifest

publickey.pem

Public key for independent signature verification

Blockchain Timestamp

manifest.json.ots

OpenTimestamps proof anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain

Immutable proof of when the evidence was captured. Cannot be forged or backdated. Independently verifiable by anyone.

Provenance Certificate

provenance_certificate.pdf

Anti-deepfake certificate with 8 integrity checks proving the evidence is an unaltered original

c2pa.json

C2PA Content Credentials manifest (open content-provenance standard): signed origin metadata, interoperable with C2PA / Content Authenticity Initiative tools and aligned with EU AI Act Art. 50

As AI-generated content floods the web, courts increasingly question whether digital evidence is real. The Provenance Certificate and C2PA manifest prove your capture is authentic, not AI-generated or manipulated. Required under EU AI Act Art. 50 (Aug 2026).

Video of Capture

capture_video.webm

Screen recording included in the evidence package, three modes:

  • Auto: records the capture process (~60s), page scroll, screenshots, metadata extraction.
  • Manual: press Start before playing media on the page (live stream, infringer video, deepfake), Stop & Capture when done. Up to 5 min on Essential / Pro, 10 min on Enterprise / Company.
  • Session: multi-tab. Records continuously while you browse across multiple tabs, then bundles a per-tab forensic package for every visited tab (full-page screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) into one signed ZIP.

All three modes hash the recorded video into the signed manifest, any single-frame change breaks the signature. Available on all plans.

SESSION CAPTURE

Multi-tab forensics in one ZIP

Record across tabs. Every visited http(s) tab gets its own forensic folder (screenshot, HTML, DOM, DNS, WHOIS, TLS, signed evidence.pdf) inside a single signed, blockchain-timestamped ZIP with a session-wide video.

Use cases: multi-platform fraud, IP theft across domains, employment claims, regulator portal audits.

See exactly what a court receives

Download Sample Evidence Package

Open the ZIP, check the PDF, verify the hash. Or send a URL to support@getproofsnap.com and we'll capture it for you free (URL must be publicly accessible, no login, paywall, or geo-block).

What the eIDAS timestamp does, and does not do, in South Africa

South Africa is not an EU member state, so the eIDAS presumption does not arise in a South African court. Article 41(2) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 shifts the burden in EU member state courts. Before the High Court, a magistrate's court or a CCMA commissioner, the qualified timestamp is independent technical corroboration that the tribunal weighs freely under section 15(3) of the ECTA, which is still worth a great deal because the time is attested by a third party outside ProofSnap.

With ProofSnap eIDAS timestamp

  • In South Africa: a third party outside ProofSnap attests the capture time, which is exactly the reliability section 15(3) of the ECTA tells the court to weigh
  • In the EU only: presumption of accuracy of date and integrity under Article 41(2) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, so the opponent carries the burden of disproof
  • Useful in a cross-border matter: recognised in all 27 EU member states without a further formality
  • Verification runs from a script in the package, so an affidavit can take the court through it step by step
  • Dual timestamp: eIDAS qualified + Bitcoin blockchain

Regular screenshot or blockchain-only

  • You carry the whole burden of authentication, with nothing outside your own device to corroborate the time
  • Nothing independent fixes when the capture was made, so the section 15(3) reliability enquiry starts against you
  • Court recognition varies by country
  • May need expert witness to explain blockchain
  • Deepfake objection can invalidate entire evidence
"A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound." Article 41(2), Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS). That presumption operates in the courts of EU member states. South Africa is not an EU member state, so a South African court is free to attach whatever weight it considers appropriate under section 15(3) of the ECTA.

eIDAS qualified timestamps issued by Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. Verify on EU Trusted List.

Flexible Plans for Every Stage

Choose your plan and activate it directly in the app.

→ Save 20%

Essential (Annual)

$8.99

about R149

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 100

  • 7-day free trial, credit card required
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 5/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp (eIDAS)

Regular use, archiving

Most Popular

Professional (Annual)

$16.99

about R282

per month

Monthly Snapshots: 200

  • 7-day free trial, credit card required
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 5-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: 15/mo
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp (eIDAS)

Blockchain timestamping, audit-grade documentation

Premium

Enterprise (Annual)

$28.99

about R481

per month

Monthly Snapshots: Unlimited

  • 7-day free trial, credit card required
  • Export individual files
  • Export ZIP archive
  • Legal-grade metadata (timestamp, hash, source)
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • File Certification: 50/mo
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 10/mo (eIDAS)

1 stamp during trial

High-volume teams, compliance-driven workflows

Company Plans

Flexible team licensing for organisations. Unlimited snapshots for all team members.

Best Value

Annual

$190

about R3,150

/licence/year

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day free trial, credit card required
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within 1 business day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)

1 stamp during trial

Perfect for legal teams, compliance departments, and enterprises

Monthly

$18.99

about R315

/licence/month

Minimum 2 licences

  • 7-day free trial, credit card required
  • Unlimited snapshots per user
  • Team management dashboard
  • Admin controls & user management
  • Email support · response within 1 business day
  • 10-min video proof (Auto + Manual + Session)
  • Provenance Certificate
  • Blockchain (OpenTimestamps)
  • File Certification: Unlimited
  • Whitelabel branding on evidence PDFs
  • EU Court-Ready Timestamp: 5/mo (eIDAS)

1 stamp during trial

Flexible monthly billing for teams

No subscription? Pay-as-you-go SnapPacks.

One-time purchase, no auto-renewal. Credits valid 12 months (Standard SnapPack never expires).

Standard SnapPack

10 captures · no expiration

$4.99

about R83

All features: export, metadata, 5-min video proof, Provenance Certificate, blockchain timestamp.

eIDAS SnapPack

EU qualified timestamps (Disig a.s.)

$24.99 / 5 stamps

about R415

$5.00 (about R83) / stamp · save 28% · also 1× $6.99 (about R116) or 10× $49.99 (about R830)

Court-grade EU timestamp per capture (eIDAS Art. 41). Includes whitelabel branding on evidence PDF.

Video SnapPack

30-min recording with audio + bundled credits

$59.99 / 3 videos

about R996

$19.99 (about R332) / video · save 20% · also 1× $24.99 (about R415) or 10× $169.99 (about R2,820)

Includes 3 regular captures + 3 eIDAS stamps bundled. Whitelabel branding included.

Purchase in the extension after sign-up. Install ProofSnap →

Evidence disappears. Messages get deleted. Pages go offline. Every day you wait is a day your evidence is at risk.

Start Free 7-Day Trial
4.8/5 on Chrome Web Store

Card declined? Enable international online purchases

Most South African banks switch off international and online (e-commerce) card payments by default, as a fraud control. A declined ProofSnap payment is almost always the bank holding the transaction, not a system error. The same block affects the Chrome Web Store, Stripe, and any international service. This is not a limit problem: your online purchase allowance is far above a subscription. You just need the switch on and the 3D Secure step approved.

Capitec

In the Capitec app, open card controls and switch on online and international purchases, then approve the payment in the app when prompted.

FNB, Standard Bank, Absa, Nedbank

Under card settings or limits in the banking app, enable online and international payments. Some banks reset this after a few days, so switch it on just before you pay.

3D Secure OTP

Approve the payment with the one-time PIN or in-app prompt. If nothing arrives, ask your bank to confirm your card is registered for 3D Secure.

Credit card works best

Credit cards clear international subscriptions more reliably than some debit cards. A one-time SnapPack is an option if you would rather not subscribe.

Two-minute fix: Open your banking app, go to card controls or limits, switch on both "online" and "international" purchases, then retry and approve the 3D Secure prompt.

Prices are in USD. Prefer not to start a subscription? A one-time SnapPack is a single up-front purchase, with no subscription, no auto-renewal, and no trial.

Done-for-You Service

Not the DIY type? We capture it for you.

For one-off legal disputes, single fraud reports, or anyone who needs evidence captured without installing anything. Send us a publicly accessible URL (no login, paywall, or geo-block) and we deliver the same 15-file court-ready package to your inbox: full-page screenshot with Content Credentials (C2PA-aligned), video + audio recording for capturing video evidence, multi-tab session capture, eIDAS qualified timestamp, and Bitcoin blockchain anchor, all included. Not sure what will hold up? Just tell us your situation and we’ll design the strongest possible evidence for your case.

Web capture · you send a URL

Single Capture

1 URL · delivered in 24 hours

$44.99
  • Video + audio recording
  • Multi-tab session
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp
  • Bitcoin blockchain anchor
  • 15-file ZIP + PDF court bundle
Order Single · $44.99 (about R747)
Best value

Evidence Pack

Up to 5 URLs · delivered in 24 hours

$149 · $29.80 (about R495) / URL
  • All features from Single, ×5
  • Unified chain-of-custody
  • Takedown bundles & fraud chains
  • Single ZIP + per-URL PDFs
  • 33% bundle discount vs. 5x Single
Order Evidence Pack · $149 (about R2,475)

File certification · you send the files

Already have the evidence as files? We authenticate chat exports, recordings, and documents as-is. One certification covers one piece of evidence, which can be several related files.

File Certification

1 evidence item · certified in 24 hours

$59.99
  • Files you already have (chat export, document, audio, video)
  • One evidence item can be several related files
  • Readable transcript rendered (chat exports)
  • eIDAS qualified timestamp + Bitcoin anchor
  • Signed ZIP + certificate PDF
Order File Certification · $59.99 (about R996)

Same forensic engine as the Chrome extension. Disig a.s., a Qualified Trust Service Provider on the EU Trusted List under Regulation (EU) 910/2014.

Need more info, or have a detailed URL list to send us? Email support@getproofsnap.com before checkout and we’ll handle it from there.

See full comparison & FAQ →

Certifying a WhatsApp conversation? See how the certified transcript works for South African courts on WhatsApp evidence in South Africa, or follow the free guide to print a WhatsApp chat for court yourself. We certify Telegram chat exports and Signal chat exports the same way.

Who Uses ProofSnap and Why

Legal professionals icon

Lawyers, Auditors & Compliance

Document evidence for legal proceedings and regulatory compliance

  • Timestamped snapshots for dispute resolution
  • Audit-ready exports for regulatory filings
  • Cryptographic hash for integrity
  • Contract, Employment disputes
Legal professional testimonial for ProofSnap
"Screenshots aren't enough in court. ProofSnap gives us the structure, timestamp, and traceability we need."
Legal Professional
Journalist icon

Journalists & Digital Investigators

Preserve online evidence for investigative reporting and OSINT research

  • Capture controversial posts or deleted pages
  • Export as PDF or ZIP for transparency
  • Embed source URL, timestamp, browser context
  • Digital forensics, website changes, online harassment
Journalist testimonial for ProofSnap
"ProofSnap lets us document the truth before it's edited, censored, or erased."
Investigative Journalist
HR professionals icon

HR Managers, Recruiters, Visa Officers, Talent Ops

Verify candidates, archive onboarding flows, and document employment records

  • LinkedIn profile snapshots for candidate verification, post validation, and prevention of profile falsification
  • Timestamped proof for employment validation and visa processing
  • Archive candidate documents for compliance and audit
  • Save snapshots of onboarding portals and signed contracts
  • HR archiving, onboarding version control, and data integrity
HR professional testimonial for ProofSnap evidence capture
"It gives us a timestamped snapshot of the entire onboarding flow, perfect for audits, visa processing, or internal reviews."
HR Director
Anyone icon

Anyone Who Needs Trusted Snapshots

Save pricing pages, receipts, agreements, or any web content you may need later

  • Save pricing pages, policies, receipts
  • Archive agreements or service terms
  • Use for personal records or disputes
  • Online casino bonus terms, payout disputes, gambling chargebacks
  • Exportable, portable, legally meaningful
Individual user testimonial for ProofSnap web evidence tool
"I don't just save what I see, I save what it means."
OSINT Researcher

Resources & Insights

Practical guides on digital evidence, compliance, and online verification.

NEW 2026 Deepfake Defence

How Evidence Survives Deepfake Objections Under FRE 707

Provenance Certificate with 8 integrity checks. Case law: Mendones v. Cushman (2025). FRE 707, Louisiana Act 250, EU AI Act Art. 50.

8 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Evidence Authentication

How to Authenticate Web Evidence That Survives Cross‑Examination

Screenshots fail under FRE 901. SHA-256 hashes, blockchain timestamps, ISO 27037 chain of custody, and open-source verification survive. Case law, Page Vault comparison.

7 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Divorce & Custody

Divorce & Custody: How to Capture Social Media Evidence for Court

81% of divorce attorneys report a surge in social media evidence (AAML). Capture Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, dating apps before they disappear. CA, TX, FL, NY state rules. FRE 901, eIDAS 2.

14 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying Evidence: How to Document It for Police & Court

46% of teens cyberbullied. Messages get deleted, accounts vanish. 5-step guide to capturing evidence police and courts accept. WhatsApp, Instagram, Discord, TikTok. UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, EU laws.

12 min read Read article
NEW 2026 Brand Protection

Brand Protection for E-Commerce: Amazon, Temu & Global Marketplaces

$467B counterfeit trade. Document Buy Box hijacking, fake reviews & counterfeits. US Lanham Act, EU DSA, eIDAS 2, FRE 901. Case law & evidence playbook.

35 min read Read article
NEW 2026 OSINT

OSINT 101: Preserve Social Media Evidence Before It’s Deleted

X, LinkedIn, Telegram & 6 more platforms. FRE 901 authentication, blockchain timestamps, GDPR, deepfake challenges, 15 FAQ. OSINT guide.

40 min read Read article

Frequently Asked Questions

Contact Us

Have questions about ProofSnap or need a business solution? Get in touch with our team.

Or contact us directly at support@getproofsnap.com